新型竹编筋加固钢梁:试验研究和力学性能

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hui Liu , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Linjie Huang , Yi Ding , Jiawei Chen
{"title":"新型竹编筋加固钢梁:试验研究和力学性能","authors":"Hui Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Wei ,&nbsp;Jiyang Yi ,&nbsp;Linjie Huang ,&nbsp;Yi Ding ,&nbsp;Jiawei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I-shaped steel is prone to instability failure when used as beams. To address this issue, a novel approach for reinforcing steel beams with bamboo scrimber (BS) was introduced. Using bamboo scrimber as stiffeners reduces steel consumption by replacing the commonly used welded steel plate stiffeners, while also preventing internal structural defects caused by welding. The bamboo scrimber stiffeners (BSSs) were bonded to both sides of the steel web with epoxy structural adhesive to provide anti-buckling support. Bending tests were conducted on two pure I-shaped steel beams (CG) used as control beams, along with 10 I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs (JQL-0/1/2/3/4) of the same span, with BSSs at varying spacings (700 mm, 350 mm, 233 mm, 175 mm, and 140 mm) as a variable, and two specimens in each variable group. The findings indicated that the failure modes of the novel beams include two types: debonding failure of BSSs and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). Compared to pure I-beams, the I-beams strengthened with BSSs showed significantly greater improvements in resisting LTB failure and enhancing ductility than in increasing load-carrying capacity. As the BSSs increased, the critical ultimate load of the I-beam strengthened with BSSs gradually increases from 6.20 % to 12.31 % over the CG specimen. Comparing with the pure I-beam, the reinforcement spacings (<em>a</em>) of JQL-0, JQL-1 and JQL-2 are 700 mm, 350 mm and 233 mm, and the ductility is increased by 47.27 %, 104.61 % and 145.18 %. When the <em>a</em> is reduced to 175 mm and 140 mm, the ductility coefficient increases by 149.50 % and 150.31 %, respectively. In addition, the ductility coefficient (<em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub>) of I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs was analyzed and predicted to support practical applications of BSSs in engineering. The regression prediction of <em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub> has a goodness of fit (R²) of 0.9753 and an RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.3287.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 120379"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steel beams strengthened with novel bamboo scrimber stiffeners: Experimental investigation and mechanical behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Hui Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Wei ,&nbsp;Jiyang Yi ,&nbsp;Linjie Huang ,&nbsp;Yi Ding ,&nbsp;Jiawei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>I-shaped steel is prone to instability failure when used as beams. To address this issue, a novel approach for reinforcing steel beams with bamboo scrimber (BS) was introduced. Using bamboo scrimber as stiffeners reduces steel consumption by replacing the commonly used welded steel plate stiffeners, while also preventing internal structural defects caused by welding. The bamboo scrimber stiffeners (BSSs) were bonded to both sides of the steel web with epoxy structural adhesive to provide anti-buckling support. Bending tests were conducted on two pure I-shaped steel beams (CG) used as control beams, along with 10 I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs (JQL-0/1/2/3/4) of the same span, with BSSs at varying spacings (700 mm, 350 mm, 233 mm, 175 mm, and 140 mm) as a variable, and two specimens in each variable group. The findings indicated that the failure modes of the novel beams include two types: debonding failure of BSSs and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). Compared to pure I-beams, the I-beams strengthened with BSSs showed significantly greater improvements in resisting LTB failure and enhancing ductility than in increasing load-carrying capacity. As the BSSs increased, the critical ultimate load of the I-beam strengthened with BSSs gradually increases from 6.20 % to 12.31 % over the CG specimen. Comparing with the pure I-beam, the reinforcement spacings (<em>a</em>) of JQL-0, JQL-1 and JQL-2 are 700 mm, 350 mm and 233 mm, and the ductility is increased by 47.27 %, 104.61 % and 145.18 %. When the <em>a</em> is reduced to 175 mm and 140 mm, the ductility coefficient increases by 149.50 % and 150.31 %, respectively. In addition, the ductility coefficient (<em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub>) of I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs was analyzed and predicted to support practical applications of BSSs in engineering. The regression prediction of <em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub> has a goodness of fit (R²) of 0.9753 and an RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.3287.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"335 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007709\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007709","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工字钢在用作梁时很容易失稳。为解决这一问题,引入了一种用竹节编织物(BS)加固钢梁的新方法。用竹节材作为加劲件可替代常用的焊接钢板加劲件,从而减少钢材消耗,同时还能防止焊接造成的内部结构缺陷。竹节加劲件(BSS)用环氧结构粘合剂粘合在钢腹板的两侧,以提供抗弯曲支撑。对两根作为对照梁的纯工字形钢梁(CG)和 10 根采用新型 BSS(JQL-0/1/2/3/4)加固的相同跨度的工字形钢梁进行了弯曲试验,BSS 的间距(700 毫米、350 毫米、233 毫米、175 毫米和 140 毫米)各不相同,每个变量组有两个试样。研究结果表明,新型梁的破坏模式包括两种:BSS 的脱粘破坏和横向扭转屈曲(LTB)。与纯工字钢相比,使用 BSS 加固的工字钢在抵抗 LTB 失效和提高延展性方面的改进明显大于提高承载能力方面的改进。随着 BSS 的增加,使用 BSS 加固的工字钢的临界极限载荷比 CG 试样从 6.20% 逐渐增加到 12.31%。与纯工字钢相比,JQL-0、JQL-1 和 JQL-2 的配筋间距(a)分别为 700 毫米、350 毫米和 233 毫米,延性分别提高了 47.27 %、104.61 % 和 145.18 %。当 a 减小到 175 mm 和 140 mm 时,延性系数分别增加了 149.50 % 和 150.31 %。此外,还对使用新型 BSS 加固的工字钢的延性系数(µ∆)进行了分析和预测,以支持 BSS 在工程中的实际应用。对 µ∆ 的回归预测拟合度 (R²) 为 0.9753,RMSE(均方根误差)为 0.3287。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Steel beams strengthened with novel bamboo scrimber stiffeners: Experimental investigation and mechanical behaviour
I-shaped steel is prone to instability failure when used as beams. To address this issue, a novel approach for reinforcing steel beams with bamboo scrimber (BS) was introduced. Using bamboo scrimber as stiffeners reduces steel consumption by replacing the commonly used welded steel plate stiffeners, while also preventing internal structural defects caused by welding. The bamboo scrimber stiffeners (BSSs) were bonded to both sides of the steel web with epoxy structural adhesive to provide anti-buckling support. Bending tests were conducted on two pure I-shaped steel beams (CG) used as control beams, along with 10 I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs (JQL-0/1/2/3/4) of the same span, with BSSs at varying spacings (700 mm, 350 mm, 233 mm, 175 mm, and 140 mm) as a variable, and two specimens in each variable group. The findings indicated that the failure modes of the novel beams include two types: debonding failure of BSSs and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). Compared to pure I-beams, the I-beams strengthened with BSSs showed significantly greater improvements in resisting LTB failure and enhancing ductility than in increasing load-carrying capacity. As the BSSs increased, the critical ultimate load of the I-beam strengthened with BSSs gradually increases from 6.20 % to 12.31 % over the CG specimen. Comparing with the pure I-beam, the reinforcement spacings (a) of JQL-0, JQL-1 and JQL-2 are 700 mm, 350 mm and 233 mm, and the ductility is increased by 47.27 %, 104.61 % and 145.18 %. When the a is reduced to 175 mm and 140 mm, the ductility coefficient increases by 149.50 % and 150.31 %, respectively. In addition, the ductility coefficient (µ) of I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs was analyzed and predicted to support practical applications of BSSs in engineering. The regression prediction of µ has a goodness of fit (R²) of 0.9753 and an RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.3287.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信