Hui Liu , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Linjie Huang , Yi Ding , Jiawei Chen
{"title":"新型竹编筋加固钢梁:试验研究和力学性能","authors":"Hui Liu , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Linjie Huang , Yi Ding , Jiawei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I-shaped steel is prone to instability failure when used as beams. To address this issue, a novel approach for reinforcing steel beams with bamboo scrimber (BS) was introduced. Using bamboo scrimber as stiffeners reduces steel consumption by replacing the commonly used welded steel plate stiffeners, while also preventing internal structural defects caused by welding. The bamboo scrimber stiffeners (BSSs) were bonded to both sides of the steel web with epoxy structural adhesive to provide anti-buckling support. Bending tests were conducted on two pure I-shaped steel beams (CG) used as control beams, along with 10 I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs (JQL-0/1/2/3/4) of the same span, with BSSs at varying spacings (700 mm, 350 mm, 233 mm, 175 mm, and 140 mm) as a variable, and two specimens in each variable group. The findings indicated that the failure modes of the novel beams include two types: debonding failure of BSSs and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). Compared to pure I-beams, the I-beams strengthened with BSSs showed significantly greater improvements in resisting LTB failure and enhancing ductility than in increasing load-carrying capacity. As the BSSs increased, the critical ultimate load of the I-beam strengthened with BSSs gradually increases from 6.20 % to 12.31 % over the CG specimen. Comparing with the pure I-beam, the reinforcement spacings (<em>a</em>) of JQL-0, JQL-1 and JQL-2 are 700 mm, 350 mm and 233 mm, and the ductility is increased by 47.27 %, 104.61 % and 145.18 %. When the <em>a</em> is reduced to 175 mm and 140 mm, the ductility coefficient increases by 149.50 % and 150.31 %, respectively. In addition, the ductility coefficient (<em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub>) of I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs was analyzed and predicted to support practical applications of BSSs in engineering. The regression prediction of <em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub> has a goodness of fit (R²) of 0.9753 and an RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.3287.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 120379"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steel beams strengthened with novel bamboo scrimber stiffeners: Experimental investigation and mechanical behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Hui Liu , Yang Wei , Jiyang Yi , Linjie Huang , Yi Ding , Jiawei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>I-shaped steel is prone to instability failure when used as beams. To address this issue, a novel approach for reinforcing steel beams with bamboo scrimber (BS) was introduced. Using bamboo scrimber as stiffeners reduces steel consumption by replacing the commonly used welded steel plate stiffeners, while also preventing internal structural defects caused by welding. The bamboo scrimber stiffeners (BSSs) were bonded to both sides of the steel web with epoxy structural adhesive to provide anti-buckling support. Bending tests were conducted on two pure I-shaped steel beams (CG) used as control beams, along with 10 I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs (JQL-0/1/2/3/4) of the same span, with BSSs at varying spacings (700 mm, 350 mm, 233 mm, 175 mm, and 140 mm) as a variable, and two specimens in each variable group. The findings indicated that the failure modes of the novel beams include two types: debonding failure of BSSs and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). Compared to pure I-beams, the I-beams strengthened with BSSs showed significantly greater improvements in resisting LTB failure and enhancing ductility than in increasing load-carrying capacity. As the BSSs increased, the critical ultimate load of the I-beam strengthened with BSSs gradually increases from 6.20 % to 12.31 % over the CG specimen. Comparing with the pure I-beam, the reinforcement spacings (<em>a</em>) of JQL-0, JQL-1 and JQL-2 are 700 mm, 350 mm and 233 mm, and the ductility is increased by 47.27 %, 104.61 % and 145.18 %. When the <em>a</em> is reduced to 175 mm and 140 mm, the ductility coefficient increases by 149.50 % and 150.31 %, respectively. In addition, the ductility coefficient (<em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub>) of I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs was analyzed and predicted to support practical applications of BSSs in engineering. The regression prediction of <em>µ</em><sub>∆</sub> has a goodness of fit (R²) of 0.9753 and an RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.3287.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"335 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007709\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007709","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Steel beams strengthened with novel bamboo scrimber stiffeners: Experimental investigation and mechanical behaviour
I-shaped steel is prone to instability failure when used as beams. To address this issue, a novel approach for reinforcing steel beams with bamboo scrimber (BS) was introduced. Using bamboo scrimber as stiffeners reduces steel consumption by replacing the commonly used welded steel plate stiffeners, while also preventing internal structural defects caused by welding. The bamboo scrimber stiffeners (BSSs) were bonded to both sides of the steel web with epoxy structural adhesive to provide anti-buckling support. Bending tests were conducted on two pure I-shaped steel beams (CG) used as control beams, along with 10 I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs (JQL-0/1/2/3/4) of the same span, with BSSs at varying spacings (700 mm, 350 mm, 233 mm, 175 mm, and 140 mm) as a variable, and two specimens in each variable group. The findings indicated that the failure modes of the novel beams include two types: debonding failure of BSSs and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). Compared to pure I-beams, the I-beams strengthened with BSSs showed significantly greater improvements in resisting LTB failure and enhancing ductility than in increasing load-carrying capacity. As the BSSs increased, the critical ultimate load of the I-beam strengthened with BSSs gradually increases from 6.20 % to 12.31 % over the CG specimen. Comparing with the pure I-beam, the reinforcement spacings (a) of JQL-0, JQL-1 and JQL-2 are 700 mm, 350 mm and 233 mm, and the ductility is increased by 47.27 %, 104.61 % and 145.18 %. When the a is reduced to 175 mm and 140 mm, the ductility coefficient increases by 149.50 % and 150.31 %, respectively. In addition, the ductility coefficient (µ∆) of I-beams strengthened with novel BSSs was analyzed and predicted to support practical applications of BSSs in engineering. The regression prediction of µ∆ has a goodness of fit (R²) of 0.9753 and an RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.3287.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.