中耳小骨的起源:一个叙述和图解的历史回顾

Q3 Medicine
S. Louryan
{"title":"中耳小骨的起源:一个叙述和图解的历史回顾","authors":"S. Louryan","doi":"10.1016/j.morpho.2025.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of the middle ear ossicles, (malleus, incus, and stapes,) has long been linked to the two first visceral (or branchial) arches. Meckel's cartilage, identified by Johann-Friedrich Meckel, is recognized as the first branchial arch cartilage, contributing to the formation of the malleus and incus. In contrast, Reichert's cartilage, associated with the second arch, is tied to the stapes. Despite these historical contributions, there remains significant debate among scientists regarding the exact roles each visceral arch plays in ossicular development, with various theories proposing different origins for these structures. Recent research has highlighted the complexity of this embryonic development, suggesting that the ossicles may arise from a mixture of neural crest cells associated with both branchial arches. Investigations into gene expression, particularly the <em>Hoxa2</em> gene, have shown that the contributions from the first and second arches to the malleus and incus are more intertwined than previously understood. Some evidence suggests that the malleus and perhaps the incus may incorporate cells from the second arch, while the stapes may also have contributions from both second arch and the otic capsule, thus complicating the classical theories of ossicle development. In conclusion, while the classical understanding of ossicles origins has been rooted in the historical classifications of Meckel's and Reichert's cartilages, modern research indicates a more intricate interplay of cellular contributions from both branchial arches. This nuanced understanding underscores the importance of continued investigation into the embryonic development of the middle ear, as this may shed light not only on human anatomy but also on the evolutionary connections between mammals and other vertebrates. The ongoing exploration of these concepts is crucial for resolving the ambiguities surrounding the ossicular system's formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39316,"journal":{"name":"Morphologie","volume":"109 366","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The origin of middle ear ossicles: A narrative and illustrated historical review\",\"authors\":\"S. Louryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.morpho.2025.100965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The development of the middle ear ossicles, (malleus, incus, and stapes,) has long been linked to the two first visceral (or branchial) arches. Meckel's cartilage, identified by Johann-Friedrich Meckel, is recognized as the first branchial arch cartilage, contributing to the formation of the malleus and incus. In contrast, Reichert's cartilage, associated with the second arch, is tied to the stapes. Despite these historical contributions, there remains significant debate among scientists regarding the exact roles each visceral arch plays in ossicular development, with various theories proposing different origins for these structures. Recent research has highlighted the complexity of this embryonic development, suggesting that the ossicles may arise from a mixture of neural crest cells associated with both branchial arches. Investigations into gene expression, particularly the <em>Hoxa2</em> gene, have shown that the contributions from the first and second arches to the malleus and incus are more intertwined than previously understood. Some evidence suggests that the malleus and perhaps the incus may incorporate cells from the second arch, while the stapes may also have contributions from both second arch and the otic capsule, thus complicating the classical theories of ossicle development. In conclusion, while the classical understanding of ossicles origins has been rooted in the historical classifications of Meckel's and Reichert's cartilages, modern research indicates a more intricate interplay of cellular contributions from both branchial arches. This nuanced understanding underscores the importance of continued investigation into the embryonic development of the middle ear, as this may shed light not only on human anatomy but also on the evolutionary connections between mammals and other vertebrates. The ongoing exploration of these concepts is crucial for resolving the ambiguities surrounding the ossicular system's formation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Morphologie\",\"volume\":\"109 366\",\"pages\":\"Article 100965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Morphologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1286011525000177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1286011525000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中耳听骨(锤骨、砧骨和镫骨)的发育长期以来被认为与两个最初的内脏弓(或鳃弓)有关。由约翰-弗里德里希·梅克尔(john - friedrich Meckel)鉴定的梅克尔软骨(Meckel’s软骨)被认为是第一个鳃弓软骨,对锤骨和砧骨的形成有贡献。相反,与第二弓相关的赖切特软骨与镫骨相连。尽管有这些历史贡献,但科学家们对每个内脏弓在听骨发育中的确切作用仍然存在重大争论,各种理论提出了这些结构的不同起源。最近的研究强调了这种胚胎发育的复杂性,表明小骨可能是由与两个鳃弓相关的神经嵴细胞的混合物产生的。对基因表达的研究,特别是对Hoxa2基因的研究表明,第一和第二弓形骨对锤骨和砧骨的贡献比以前所理解的要复杂得多。一些证据表明,锤骨和砧骨可能含有来自第二足弓的细胞,而镫骨也可能同时含有来自第二足弓和耳囊的细胞,从而使经典的听骨发育理论复杂化。总之,虽然对小骨起源的经典理解植根于Meckel和Reichert软骨的历史分类,但现代研究表明,来自两支弓的细胞贡献更复杂的相互作用。这种微妙的理解强调了继续研究中耳胚胎发育的重要性,因为这不仅可以揭示人类解剖学,还可以揭示哺乳动物和其他脊椎动物之间的进化联系。这些概念的持续探索对于解决听骨系统形成的模糊性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The origin of middle ear ossicles: A narrative and illustrated historical review
The development of the middle ear ossicles, (malleus, incus, and stapes,) has long been linked to the two first visceral (or branchial) arches. Meckel's cartilage, identified by Johann-Friedrich Meckel, is recognized as the first branchial arch cartilage, contributing to the formation of the malleus and incus. In contrast, Reichert's cartilage, associated with the second arch, is tied to the stapes. Despite these historical contributions, there remains significant debate among scientists regarding the exact roles each visceral arch plays in ossicular development, with various theories proposing different origins for these structures. Recent research has highlighted the complexity of this embryonic development, suggesting that the ossicles may arise from a mixture of neural crest cells associated with both branchial arches. Investigations into gene expression, particularly the Hoxa2 gene, have shown that the contributions from the first and second arches to the malleus and incus are more intertwined than previously understood. Some evidence suggests that the malleus and perhaps the incus may incorporate cells from the second arch, while the stapes may also have contributions from both second arch and the otic capsule, thus complicating the classical theories of ossicle development. In conclusion, while the classical understanding of ossicles origins has been rooted in the historical classifications of Meckel's and Reichert's cartilages, modern research indicates a more intricate interplay of cellular contributions from both branchial arches. This nuanced understanding underscores the importance of continued investigation into the embryonic development of the middle ear, as this may shed light not only on human anatomy but also on the evolutionary connections between mammals and other vertebrates. The ongoing exploration of these concepts is crucial for resolving the ambiguities surrounding the ossicular system's formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Morphologie
Morphologie Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Morphologie est une revue universitaire avec une ouverture médicale qui sa adresse aux enseignants, aux étudiants, aux chercheurs et aux cliniciens en anatomie et en morphologie. Vous y trouverez les développements les plus actuels de votre spécialité, en France comme a international. Le objectif de Morphologie est d?offrir des lectures privilégiées sous forme de revues générales, d?articles originaux, de mises au point didactiques et de revues de la littérature, qui permettront notamment aux enseignants de optimiser leurs cours et aux spécialistes d?enrichir leurs connaissances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信