Jiaolong Wu, Ying Wu, Xiaogang Sheng, Yudan Li, Miao Pan
{"title":"基于神经网络方法的近阈值电子和正电子诱导原子内壳电离截面测量中的不适定反问题研究","authors":"Jiaolong Wu, Ying Wu, Xiaogang Sheng, Yudan Li, Miao Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate measurement of near-threshold positron or electron impact atomic inner-shell ionization cross-sections is of significant importance both theoretically and in practical applications. Due to the complexity of preparing thin targets, difficulty in precisely measuring their thickness, and the low characteristic X-ray collection efficiency of thin targets in positron collision experiments, the thick-target method is typically employed. Solving the corresponding inner-shell ionization cross-section from the experimental yield of thick targets is an ill-posed inverse problem. Existing methods such as the direct comparison method, yield differential method, and regularization method, do not achieve ideal accuracy. Although our research group has recently developed the MC-neural network method, which significantly improves solution accuracy, it is highly time-consuming to use Monte Carlo simulations to generate neural network datasets. To address this issue, we have developed a numerical-neural network method, which uses numerical calculations to quickly generate large-scale, high-quality datasets for training convolutional neural network models to solve the inverse problem of thick target experimental cross-sections. In this study, numerical-neural network and MC-neural network methods are used to process the experimental yield data of K<sub>ɑβ</sub> characteristic X-rays from Ti and L<sub>ɑβγ</sub> characteristic X-rays from Ag in positron collisions with pure thick targets at energies below 10 keV. The positron-induced K-shell ionization cross-section of Ti and the L<sub>ɑβγ</sub> characteristic X-ray production cross-section of Ag are obtained, which are compared with the experimental cross-sections obtained by the direct comparison method by other researchers and the DWBA theoretical values. The results show that the outcomes obtained by both neural network methods are in good agreement with the results from others and the DWBA theoretical values, and the numerical-neural network method is superior to the MC-neural network method in terms of solution accuracy. In addition, this study also reprocessed the experimental yield data of K<sub>ɑβ</sub> characteristic X-rays of Zr and L<sub>ɑβ</sub> characteristic X-rays of Au induced by electrons at energies below 27 keV, obtained by Li et al. of Sichuan University using the thick-target method. This also confirmed that the numerical-neural network method has more advantages than other methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 112818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the ill-posed inverse problem in measuring near-threshold electron and positron-induced atomic inner-shell ionization cross-sections based on neural network approaches\",\"authors\":\"Jiaolong Wu, Ying Wu, Xiaogang Sheng, Yudan Li, Miao Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate measurement of near-threshold positron or electron impact atomic inner-shell ionization cross-sections is of significant importance both theoretically and in practical applications. Due to the complexity of preparing thin targets, difficulty in precisely measuring their thickness, and the low characteristic X-ray collection efficiency of thin targets in positron collision experiments, the thick-target method is typically employed. Solving the corresponding inner-shell ionization cross-section from the experimental yield of thick targets is an ill-posed inverse problem. Existing methods such as the direct comparison method, yield differential method, and regularization method, do not achieve ideal accuracy. Although our research group has recently developed the MC-neural network method, which significantly improves solution accuracy, it is highly time-consuming to use Monte Carlo simulations to generate neural network datasets. To address this issue, we have developed a numerical-neural network method, which uses numerical calculations to quickly generate large-scale, high-quality datasets for training convolutional neural network models to solve the inverse problem of thick target experimental cross-sections. In this study, numerical-neural network and MC-neural network methods are used to process the experimental yield data of K<sub>ɑβ</sub> characteristic X-rays from Ti and L<sub>ɑβγ</sub> characteristic X-rays from Ag in positron collisions with pure thick targets at energies below 10 keV. The positron-induced K-shell ionization cross-section of Ti and the L<sub>ɑβγ</sub> characteristic X-ray production cross-section of Ag are obtained, which are compared with the experimental cross-sections obtained by the direct comparison method by other researchers and the DWBA theoretical values. The results show that the outcomes obtained by both neural network methods are in good agreement with the results from others and the DWBA theoretical values, and the numerical-neural network method is superior to the MC-neural network method in terms of solution accuracy. In addition, this study also reprocessed the experimental yield data of K<sub>ɑβ</sub> characteristic X-rays of Zr and L<sub>ɑβ</sub> characteristic X-rays of Au induced by electrons at energies below 27 keV, obtained by Li et al. of Sichuan University using the thick-target method. This also confirmed that the numerical-neural network method has more advantages than other methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X2500310X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X2500310X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of the ill-posed inverse problem in measuring near-threshold electron and positron-induced atomic inner-shell ionization cross-sections based on neural network approaches
Accurate measurement of near-threshold positron or electron impact atomic inner-shell ionization cross-sections is of significant importance both theoretically and in practical applications. Due to the complexity of preparing thin targets, difficulty in precisely measuring their thickness, and the low characteristic X-ray collection efficiency of thin targets in positron collision experiments, the thick-target method is typically employed. Solving the corresponding inner-shell ionization cross-section from the experimental yield of thick targets is an ill-posed inverse problem. Existing methods such as the direct comparison method, yield differential method, and regularization method, do not achieve ideal accuracy. Although our research group has recently developed the MC-neural network method, which significantly improves solution accuracy, it is highly time-consuming to use Monte Carlo simulations to generate neural network datasets. To address this issue, we have developed a numerical-neural network method, which uses numerical calculations to quickly generate large-scale, high-quality datasets for training convolutional neural network models to solve the inverse problem of thick target experimental cross-sections. In this study, numerical-neural network and MC-neural network methods are used to process the experimental yield data of Kɑβ characteristic X-rays from Ti and Lɑβγ characteristic X-rays from Ag in positron collisions with pure thick targets at energies below 10 keV. The positron-induced K-shell ionization cross-section of Ti and the Lɑβγ characteristic X-ray production cross-section of Ag are obtained, which are compared with the experimental cross-sections obtained by the direct comparison method by other researchers and the DWBA theoretical values. The results show that the outcomes obtained by both neural network methods are in good agreement with the results from others and the DWBA theoretical values, and the numerical-neural network method is superior to the MC-neural network method in terms of solution accuracy. In addition, this study also reprocessed the experimental yield data of Kɑβ characteristic X-rays of Zr and Lɑβ characteristic X-rays of Au induced by electrons at energies below 27 keV, obtained by Li et al. of Sichuan University using the thick-target method. This also confirmed that the numerical-neural network method has more advantages than other methods.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.