碳纤维布约束对低强度混凝土中钢筋粘结滑移行为的影响:试验、预测和参数研究

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Abouzar Jafari , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Hayder A. Abdulridha , Baqer I. Issa , Habib Akbarzadeh Bengar
{"title":"碳纤维布约束对低强度混凝土中钢筋粘结滑移行为的影响:试验、预测和参数研究","authors":"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Hayder A. Abdulridha ,&nbsp;Baqer I. Issa ,&nbsp;Habib Akbarzadeh Bengar","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bond strength between steel rebar and low-strength concrete (LSC) is critical for the structural integrity of reinforced concrete structures, particularly in seismic regions where weak bonding can compromise load transfer and overall stability. To address this issue, an experimental study was conducted on 216 unique pullout specimen designs, incorporating concrete compressive strengths of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 MPa, rebar diameters of 12, 16, and 20 mm, concrete cover sizes of 25, 35, 45, and 55 mm, and CFRP confinement conditions (unconfined, and confined with one or two CFRP layers). Using the LASSO optimization algorithm, a closed-form solution was developed to predict bond strength, integrating key influencing parameters. The results demonstrated that CFRP confinement significantly enhanced bond strength, with a maximum improvement of 184 % for specimens with two CFRP layers. The increase in concrete cover led to a rise in bond strength, with a maximum recorded bond strength of 24.72 MPa in CFRP-confined specimens. Conversely, increasing rebar diameter from 12 mm to 20 mm resulted in a bond strength reduction of up to 27.7 %, highlighting the inverse relationship between rebar size and bond performance. The parametric sensitivity analysis revealed that compressive strength had the most substantial effect on bond strength (81.8 %), followed by concrete cover (23.5 %) and CFRP confinement (13.6 %), while rebar diameter had a negative impact (-18.9 %). The developed predictive model provides a practical and reliable tool for estimating bond performance, demonstrating that CFRP confinement can enhance the bond strength of LSC to levels comparable with higher-strength unconfined concrete. These findings offer valuable insights into the design, assessment, and strengthening of reinforced concrete structures, contributing to the development of efficient retrofit strategies for improving structural resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"477 ","pages":"Article 141333"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of CFRP confinement on bond-slip behavior of steel rebar in low-strength concrete: Experimentation, prediction and parametric study\",\"authors\":\"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Hayder A. Abdulridha ,&nbsp;Baqer I. Issa ,&nbsp;Habib Akbarzadeh Bengar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The bond strength between steel rebar and low-strength concrete (LSC) is critical for the structural integrity of reinforced concrete structures, particularly in seismic regions where weak bonding can compromise load transfer and overall stability. To address this issue, an experimental study was conducted on 216 unique pullout specimen designs, incorporating concrete compressive strengths of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 MPa, rebar diameters of 12, 16, and 20 mm, concrete cover sizes of 25, 35, 45, and 55 mm, and CFRP confinement conditions (unconfined, and confined with one or two CFRP layers). Using the LASSO optimization algorithm, a closed-form solution was developed to predict bond strength, integrating key influencing parameters. The results demonstrated that CFRP confinement significantly enhanced bond strength, with a maximum improvement of 184 % for specimens with two CFRP layers. The increase in concrete cover led to a rise in bond strength, with a maximum recorded bond strength of 24.72 MPa in CFRP-confined specimens. Conversely, increasing rebar diameter from 12 mm to 20 mm resulted in a bond strength reduction of up to 27.7 %, highlighting the inverse relationship between rebar size and bond performance. The parametric sensitivity analysis revealed that compressive strength had the most substantial effect on bond strength (81.8 %), followed by concrete cover (23.5 %) and CFRP confinement (13.6 %), while rebar diameter had a negative impact (-18.9 %). The developed predictive model provides a practical and reliable tool for estimating bond performance, demonstrating that CFRP confinement can enhance the bond strength of LSC to levels comparable with higher-strength unconfined concrete. These findings offer valuable insights into the design, assessment, and strengthening of reinforced concrete structures, contributing to the development of efficient retrofit strategies for improving structural resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"477 \",\"pages\":\"Article 141333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825014813\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825014813","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢筋与低强度混凝土(LSC)之间的粘结强度对钢筋混凝土结构的完整性至关重要,特别是在地震区域,弱粘结会影响荷载传递和整体稳定性。为了解决这一问题,对216个独特的拉拔试件设计进行了实验研究,包括混凝土抗压强度为5、10、15、20、25和30 MPa,钢筋直径为12、16和20 mm,混凝土覆盖尺寸为25、35、45和55 mm,以及CFRP约束条件(无约束,约束有一个或两个CFRP层)。利用LASSO优化算法,综合关键影响参数,建立了预测粘结强度的封闭解。结果表明,CFRP约束显著提高了粘结强度,两层CFRP约束最大可提高184 %。混凝土覆盖层的增加导致了粘结强度的提高,cfrp约束试件的最大粘结强度为24.72 MPa。相反,当螺纹钢直径从12 mm增加到20 mm时,粘结强度降低了27.7% %,表明螺纹钢尺寸与粘结性能呈反比关系。参数敏感性分析表明,抗压强度对粘结强度的影响最大(81.8 %),其次是混凝土保护层(23.5 %)和CFRP约束(13.6 %),而钢筋直径对粘结强度的影响为负(-18.9 %)。开发的预测模型为估计粘结性能提供了实用可靠的工具,表明CFRP约束可以将LSC的粘结强度提高到与高强度无约束混凝土相当的水平。这些发现为钢筋混凝土结构的设计、评估和加固提供了有价值的见解,有助于开发有效的改造策略,以提高结构的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of CFRP confinement on bond-slip behavior of steel rebar in low-strength concrete: Experimentation, prediction and parametric study
The bond strength between steel rebar and low-strength concrete (LSC) is critical for the structural integrity of reinforced concrete structures, particularly in seismic regions where weak bonding can compromise load transfer and overall stability. To address this issue, an experimental study was conducted on 216 unique pullout specimen designs, incorporating concrete compressive strengths of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 MPa, rebar diameters of 12, 16, and 20 mm, concrete cover sizes of 25, 35, 45, and 55 mm, and CFRP confinement conditions (unconfined, and confined with one or two CFRP layers). Using the LASSO optimization algorithm, a closed-form solution was developed to predict bond strength, integrating key influencing parameters. The results demonstrated that CFRP confinement significantly enhanced bond strength, with a maximum improvement of 184 % for specimens with two CFRP layers. The increase in concrete cover led to a rise in bond strength, with a maximum recorded bond strength of 24.72 MPa in CFRP-confined specimens. Conversely, increasing rebar diameter from 12 mm to 20 mm resulted in a bond strength reduction of up to 27.7 %, highlighting the inverse relationship between rebar size and bond performance. The parametric sensitivity analysis revealed that compressive strength had the most substantial effect on bond strength (81.8 %), followed by concrete cover (23.5 %) and CFRP confinement (13.6 %), while rebar diameter had a negative impact (-18.9 %). The developed predictive model provides a practical and reliable tool for estimating bond performance, demonstrating that CFRP confinement can enhance the bond strength of LSC to levels comparable with higher-strength unconfined concrete. These findings offer valuable insights into the design, assessment, and strengthening of reinforced concrete structures, contributing to the development of efficient retrofit strategies for improving structural resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信