母乳喂养与婴幼儿健康结局:系统综述。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Carrie D Patnode,Nora B Henrikson,Elizabeth M Webber,Paula R Blasi,Caitlyn A Senger,Janelle M Guirguis-Blake
{"title":"母乳喂养与婴幼儿健康结局:系统综述。","authors":"Carrie D Patnode,Nora B Henrikson,Elizabeth M Webber,Paula R Blasi,Caitlyn A Senger,Janelle M Guirguis-Blake","doi":"10.1542/peds.2025-071516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nOur understanding of the benefits of breastfeeding and the consumption of human milk for specific infant outcomes and the magnitude of those benefits continues to evolve.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nReview the evidence on the association between breastfeeding and child health outcomes.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nSystematic literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL for English-language articles published from 2006 to August 14, 2024.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nExisting systematic reviews (ESRs) and primary studies comparing various breastfeeding exposures and child health outcomes among term infants in developed countries.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nAbstracted data on study design, demographics, breastfeeding exposures and referents, and outcomes. Results of ESRs were synthesized alongside those of newer primary studies.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwenty-nine ESRs and 145 primary studies were included. An association indicating a reduced risk from more versus less breastfeeding was apparent for moderate-to-severe respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, otitis media, allergic rhinitis, asthma, malocclusion, inflammatory bowel disease, type 1 diabetes, rapid weight gain and growth, obesity, systolic blood pressure, childhood leukemia, and infant mortality. There was no clear threshold of breastfeeding duration that appeared to be most beneficial for any outcome. There was little data on any associations varied by mode of breastfeeding or source of breastmilk.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nObservational studies with risks of bias related to confounding, missing data and a lack of consistency in measurement and reporting of breastfeeding exposures.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBreastfeeding is associated with beneficial effects for several infant and child outcomes. Further research that addresses the limitations of existing studies is needed to continue to inform national initiatives.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breastfeeding and Health Outcomes for Infants and Children: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Carrie D Patnode,Nora B Henrikson,Elizabeth M Webber,Paula R Blasi,Caitlyn A Senger,Janelle M Guirguis-Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2025-071516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\r\\nOur understanding of the benefits of breastfeeding and the consumption of human milk for specific infant outcomes and the magnitude of those benefits continues to evolve.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nReview the evidence on the association between breastfeeding and child health outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA SOURCES\\r\\nSystematic literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL for English-language articles published from 2006 to August 14, 2024.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY SELECTION\\r\\nExisting systematic reviews (ESRs) and primary studies comparing various breastfeeding exposures and child health outcomes among term infants in developed countries.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA EXTRACTION\\r\\nAbstracted data on study design, demographics, breastfeeding exposures and referents, and outcomes. Results of ESRs were synthesized alongside those of newer primary studies.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTwenty-nine ESRs and 145 primary studies were included. An association indicating a reduced risk from more versus less breastfeeding was apparent for moderate-to-severe respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, otitis media, allergic rhinitis, asthma, malocclusion, inflammatory bowel disease, type 1 diabetes, rapid weight gain and growth, obesity, systolic blood pressure, childhood leukemia, and infant mortality. There was no clear threshold of breastfeeding duration that appeared to be most beneficial for any outcome. There was little data on any associations varied by mode of breastfeeding or source of breastmilk.\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS\\r\\nObservational studies with risks of bias related to confounding, missing data and a lack of consistency in measurement and reporting of breastfeeding exposures.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nBreastfeeding is associated with beneficial effects for several infant and child outcomes. Further research that addresses the limitations of existing studies is needed to continue to inform national initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-071516\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-071516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对母乳喂养和食用母乳对特定婴儿结局的益处以及这些益处的程度的理解在不断发展。目的回顾母乳喂养与儿童健康结局之间关系的证据。数据来源在MEDLINE, Embase和CINAHL中系统检索2006年至2024年8月14日发表的英文文章。研究选择:比较发达国家足月婴儿各种母乳喂养暴露和儿童健康结局的现有系统评价(ESRs)和初步研究。数据提取:研究设计、人口统计、母乳喂养暴露和指标以及结果的抽象数据。esr的结果与较新的初步研究的结果一起合成。结果纳入29项esr和145项初步研究。在中重度呼吸道和胃肠道感染、中耳炎、过敏性鼻炎、哮喘、错牙合、炎症性肠病、1型糖尿病、体重快速增加和生长、肥胖、收缩压、儿童白血病和婴儿死亡率方面,明显存在多母乳喂养与少母乳喂养降低风险的关联。没有明确的母乳喂养时间阈值似乎对任何结果都是最有益的。几乎没有数据表明母乳喂养方式或母乳来源之间存在任何关联。局限性:观察性研究存在与混淆、数据缺失和母乳喂养暴露测量和报告缺乏一致性相关的偏倚风险。结论母乳喂养对婴儿和儿童的一些结局有有益的影响。需要进一步研究解决现有研究的局限性,以便继续为国家倡议提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breastfeeding and Health Outcomes for Infants and Children: A Systematic Review.
CONTEXT Our understanding of the benefits of breastfeeding and the consumption of human milk for specific infant outcomes and the magnitude of those benefits continues to evolve. OBJECTIVE Review the evidence on the association between breastfeeding and child health outcomes. DATA SOURCES Systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL for English-language articles published from 2006 to August 14, 2024. STUDY SELECTION Existing systematic reviews (ESRs) and primary studies comparing various breastfeeding exposures and child health outcomes among term infants in developed countries. DATA EXTRACTION Abstracted data on study design, demographics, breastfeeding exposures and referents, and outcomes. Results of ESRs were synthesized alongside those of newer primary studies. RESULTS Twenty-nine ESRs and 145 primary studies were included. An association indicating a reduced risk from more versus less breastfeeding was apparent for moderate-to-severe respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, otitis media, allergic rhinitis, asthma, malocclusion, inflammatory bowel disease, type 1 diabetes, rapid weight gain and growth, obesity, systolic blood pressure, childhood leukemia, and infant mortality. There was no clear threshold of breastfeeding duration that appeared to be most beneficial for any outcome. There was little data on any associations varied by mode of breastfeeding or source of breastmilk. LIMITATIONS Observational studies with risks of bias related to confounding, missing data and a lack of consistency in measurement and reporting of breastfeeding exposures. CONCLUSIONS Breastfeeding is associated with beneficial effects for several infant and child outcomes. Further research that addresses the limitations of existing studies is needed to continue to inform national initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信