中学科学教师的概念和修改,以支持公平参与共同设计的计算思维课程

IF 3.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marissa Levy, Amanda Peel, Lexie Zhao, Nicholas LaGrassa, Michael S. Horn, Uri Wilensky
{"title":"中学科学教师的概念和修改,以支持公平参与共同设计的计算思维课程","authors":"Marissa Levy,&nbsp;Amanda Peel,&nbsp;Lexie Zhao,&nbsp;Nicholas LaGrassa,&nbsp;Michael S. Horn,&nbsp;Uri Wilensky","doi":"10.1002/tea.21998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing access to computational ideas and practices is one important reason to integrate computational thinking (CT) in science classrooms. While integrating CT into science classrooms broadens exposure to computing, it may not be enough to ensure equitable participation in the science classroom. Equitable participation is crucial because providing students with an environment in which they are able to fully engage and participate in science and computing practices empowers students to learn and continue pursuing CT and science. To foreground equitable participation in CT-integrated curricula, we undertook a research project in which researchers and teachers examined teacher conceptualizations of equitable participation and how teachers design for equitable participation by modifying a lesson that introduces computational modeling in science. The following research questions guided the study: (1) What are teachers' conceptualizations of equitable participation? (2) How do teachers design for equitable participation through co-design of a CT-integrated unit? Our findings suggest that teachers conceptualized and designed for equitable participation in the context of a CT-integrated curriculum across three primary dimensions: accessibility, inclusion, and relevancy. Our contributions to the field of science teaching and learning are twofold: (1) obtaining an initial understanding of how teachers think about and design for equitable participation is crucial in order to support teachers in their pursuit of creating equitable learning experiences for CT and science learners, and (2) our findings show that we can study teacher conceptualizations and their design choices by examining specific modifications to a CT-integrated science curriculum. Implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","volume":"62 5","pages":"1167-1201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.21998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary science teachers' conceptualizations and modifications to support equitable participation in a co-designed computational thinking lesson\",\"authors\":\"Marissa Levy,&nbsp;Amanda Peel,&nbsp;Lexie Zhao,&nbsp;Nicholas LaGrassa,&nbsp;Michael S. Horn,&nbsp;Uri Wilensky\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tea.21998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Increasing access to computational ideas and practices is one important reason to integrate computational thinking (CT) in science classrooms. While integrating CT into science classrooms broadens exposure to computing, it may not be enough to ensure equitable participation in the science classroom. Equitable participation is crucial because providing students with an environment in which they are able to fully engage and participate in science and computing practices empowers students to learn and continue pursuing CT and science. To foreground equitable participation in CT-integrated curricula, we undertook a research project in which researchers and teachers examined teacher conceptualizations of equitable participation and how teachers design for equitable participation by modifying a lesson that introduces computational modeling in science. The following research questions guided the study: (1) What are teachers' conceptualizations of equitable participation? (2) How do teachers design for equitable participation through co-design of a CT-integrated unit? Our findings suggest that teachers conceptualized and designed for equitable participation in the context of a CT-integrated curriculum across three primary dimensions: accessibility, inclusion, and relevancy. Our contributions to the field of science teaching and learning are twofold: (1) obtaining an initial understanding of how teachers think about and design for equitable participation is crucial in order to support teachers in their pursuit of creating equitable learning experiences for CT and science learners, and (2) our findings show that we can study teacher conceptualizations and their design choices by examining specific modifications to a CT-integrated science curriculum. Implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Science Teaching\",\"volume\":\"62 5\",\"pages\":\"1167-1201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.21998\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Science Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增加对计算思想和实践的接触是将计算思维(CT)融入科学课堂的一个重要原因。虽然将CT纳入科学课堂扩大了计算机的接触范围,但这可能不足以确保科学课堂的公平参与。公平参与至关重要,因为为学生提供一个能够充分参与和参与科学和计算实践的环境,使学生能够学习和继续追求计算机科学和科学。为了在ct整合课程中突出公平参与的前景,我们开展了一项研究项目,研究人员和教师调查了教师对公平参与的概念,以及教师如何通过修改介绍科学计算建模的课程来设计公平参与。以下研究问题指导了本研究:(1)教师对公平参与的概念是什么?(2)教师如何通过协同设计ct整合单元来设计公平参与?我们的研究结果表明,教师从三个主要维度(可及性、包容性和相关性)概念化和设计了在ct整合课程背景下的公平参与。我们对科学教学领域的贡献是双重的:(1)初步了解教师如何思考和设计公平参与,这对于支持教师为CT和科学学习者创造公平的学习体验至关重要;(2)我们的研究结果表明,我们可以通过检查对CT整合科学课程的具体修改来研究教师的概念和他们的设计选择。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Secondary science teachers' conceptualizations and modifications to support equitable participation in a co-designed computational thinking lesson

Secondary science teachers' conceptualizations and modifications to support equitable participation in a co-designed computational thinking lesson

Increasing access to computational ideas and practices is one important reason to integrate computational thinking (CT) in science classrooms. While integrating CT into science classrooms broadens exposure to computing, it may not be enough to ensure equitable participation in the science classroom. Equitable participation is crucial because providing students with an environment in which they are able to fully engage and participate in science and computing practices empowers students to learn and continue pursuing CT and science. To foreground equitable participation in CT-integrated curricula, we undertook a research project in which researchers and teachers examined teacher conceptualizations of equitable participation and how teachers design for equitable participation by modifying a lesson that introduces computational modeling in science. The following research questions guided the study: (1) What are teachers' conceptualizations of equitable participation? (2) How do teachers design for equitable participation through co-design of a CT-integrated unit? Our findings suggest that teachers conceptualized and designed for equitable participation in the context of a CT-integrated curriculum across three primary dimensions: accessibility, inclusion, and relevancy. Our contributions to the field of science teaching and learning are twofold: (1) obtaining an initial understanding of how teachers think about and design for equitable participation is crucial in order to support teachers in their pursuit of creating equitable learning experiences for CT and science learners, and (2) our findings show that we can study teacher conceptualizations and their design choices by examining specific modifications to a CT-integrated science curriculum. Implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Journal of Research in Science Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
19.60%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, the official journal of NARST: A Worldwide Organization for Improving Science Teaching and Learning Through Research, publishes reports for science education researchers and practitioners on issues of science teaching and learning and science education policy. Scholarly manuscripts within the domain of the Journal of Research in Science Teaching include, but are not limited to, investigations employing qualitative, ethnographic, historical, survey, philosophical, case study research, quantitative, experimental, quasi-experimental, data mining, and data analytics approaches; position papers; policy perspectives; critical reviews of the literature; and comments and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信