一种预测入侵物种扩散的新环境抗性模型

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Yunpeng Liu, John T. Kartesz, Misako Nishino, Diane J. E. Sturgeon, Matthew B. Thomas
{"title":"一种预测入侵物种扩散的新环境抗性模型","authors":"Yunpeng Liu,&nbsp;John T. Kartesz,&nbsp;Misako Nishino,&nbsp;Diane J. E. Sturgeon,&nbsp;Matthew B. Thomas","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Predictive models on invasive species spread can assist in identifying large-scale invasion risk. Environmental resistance (ER) models, which predict spread based on ecological similarity to already-invaded communities, offer one approach. However, gaps remain in understanding how different ER measurements perform across different taxa and how they can be integrated with future global change. Here, we aim to discern the primary drivers of invasion spread by comparing different ER models and then use the best models to forecast future invasion dynamics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eastern US.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxa</h3>\n \n <p>1873 invasive plants and animals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We developed different ER measurements, including biotic similarities among native plants in their species and phylogenetic assemblages, and functional traits, and abiotic similarities in climate, soil, and human disturbances. We obtained the best ER model for each invasive species to evaluate their potential invasion extents; and we further predicted their future range shifts under climate change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Native plant similarities provided the best proxy measure of ER for both invasive plants and animals. Invasion hotspots were identified in urban and coastal areas, and the predicted potential invasion ranges under current conditions extended from these hotspots to the neighboring areas. The invasion range for most invasives was predicted to increase under future climate change, with Arthropoda and Tracheophyta generally expanding the most among all taxa. The invasives that are predicted to expand their range in the future have already occupied larger areas than the invasives whose ranges are predicted to contract.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results highlight the importance of maintaining diverse native communities in invasion control and raise the concern of increased invasion risk in the future. Our findings call for more efforts on invasion monitoring in areas near large cities, and increased capacity for early detection and rapid response to prevent the current invasives spreading more widely.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Updated Environmental Resistance Model for Predicting the Spread of Invasive Species\",\"authors\":\"Yunpeng Liu,&nbsp;John T. Kartesz,&nbsp;Misako Nishino,&nbsp;Diane J. E. Sturgeon,&nbsp;Matthew B. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Predictive models on invasive species spread can assist in identifying large-scale invasion risk. Environmental resistance (ER) models, which predict spread based on ecological similarity to already-invaded communities, offer one approach. However, gaps remain in understanding how different ER measurements perform across different taxa and how they can be integrated with future global change. Here, we aim to discern the primary drivers of invasion spread by comparing different ER models and then use the best models to forecast future invasion dynamics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eastern US.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxa</h3>\\n \\n <p>1873 invasive plants and animals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We developed different ER measurements, including biotic similarities among native plants in their species and phylogenetic assemblages, and functional traits, and abiotic similarities in climate, soil, and human disturbances. We obtained the best ER model for each invasive species to evaluate their potential invasion extents; and we further predicted their future range shifts under climate change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Native plant similarities provided the best proxy measure of ER for both invasive plants and animals. Invasion hotspots were identified in urban and coastal areas, and the predicted potential invasion ranges under current conditions extended from these hotspots to the neighboring areas. The invasion range for most invasives was predicted to increase under future climate change, with Arthropoda and Tracheophyta generally expanding the most among all taxa. The invasives that are predicted to expand their range in the future have already occupied larger areas than the invasives whose ranges are predicted to contract.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results highlight the importance of maintaining diverse native communities in invasion control and raise the concern of increased invasion risk in the future. Our findings call for more efforts on invasion monitoring in areas near large cities, and increased capacity for early detection and rapid response to prevent the current invasives spreading more widely.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立入侵物种扩散预测模型,帮助识别大规模入侵风险。环境抗性(ER)模型提供了一种方法,该模型基于与已入侵群落的生态相似性来预测传播。然而,在了解不同的ER测量在不同分类群中的表现以及如何将它们与未来的全球变化相结合方面仍然存在差距。在此,我们旨在通过比较不同的ER模型来识别入侵传播的主要驱动因素,然后使用最佳模型来预测未来的入侵动态。地点:美国东部。分类群1873年入侵植物和动物。方法采用不同的ER测量方法,包括本地植物在物种、系统发育组合、功能性状、气候、土壤和人为干扰等方面的生物相似性。我们得到了各入侵物种的最佳ER模型,以评估其潜在的入侵程度;我们进一步预测了气候变化下它们未来的范围变化。结果原生植物相似度是入侵植物和入侵动物的最佳替代指标。在城市和沿海地区确定了入侵热点,在当前条件下,预测的潜在入侵范围从这些热点扩展到邻近地区。在未来气候变化的影响下,大部分物种的入侵范围都将扩大,其中节肢动物和气管植物的扩张幅度最大。那些被预测将在未来扩大其活动范围的入侵物种已经占据了比那些活动范围被预测将缩小的入侵物种更大的区域。这些结果强调了保持本土群落多样性在入侵控制中的重要性,并提出了未来入侵风险增加的担忧。我们的研究结果呼吁在大城市附近地区加大入侵监测的力度,提高早期发现和快速反应的能力,以防止目前的入侵更广泛地传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Updated Environmental Resistance Model for Predicting the Spread of Invasive Species

Aim

Predictive models on invasive species spread can assist in identifying large-scale invasion risk. Environmental resistance (ER) models, which predict spread based on ecological similarity to already-invaded communities, offer one approach. However, gaps remain in understanding how different ER measurements perform across different taxa and how they can be integrated with future global change. Here, we aim to discern the primary drivers of invasion spread by comparing different ER models and then use the best models to forecast future invasion dynamics.

Location

Eastern US.

Taxa

1873 invasive plants and animals.

Methods

We developed different ER measurements, including biotic similarities among native plants in their species and phylogenetic assemblages, and functional traits, and abiotic similarities in climate, soil, and human disturbances. We obtained the best ER model for each invasive species to evaluate their potential invasion extents; and we further predicted their future range shifts under climate change.

Results

Native plant similarities provided the best proxy measure of ER for both invasive plants and animals. Invasion hotspots were identified in urban and coastal areas, and the predicted potential invasion ranges under current conditions extended from these hotspots to the neighboring areas. The invasion range for most invasives was predicted to increase under future climate change, with Arthropoda and Tracheophyta generally expanding the most among all taxa. The invasives that are predicted to expand their range in the future have already occupied larger areas than the invasives whose ranges are predicted to contract.

Main Conclusions

These results highlight the importance of maintaining diverse native communities in invasion control and raise the concern of increased invasion risk in the future. Our findings call for more efforts on invasion monitoring in areas near large cities, and increased capacity for early detection and rapid response to prevent the current invasives spreading more widely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信