轮廓还是实心?图标风格对用户感知的作用

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Zhangfan Shen, Yi Wang, Moke Li, Jiaxiang Chen, Zhanpeng Hu
{"title":"轮廓还是实心?图标风格对用户感知的作用","authors":"Zhangfan Shen,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Moke Li,&nbsp;Jiaxiang Chen,&nbsp;Zhanpeng Hu","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite the many studies investigated the impact of icon design on usability in the past, few have compared outline icons with solid icons. This study combines familiarity training, recognition tasks, and visual search tasks to explore how icon design style and internal cognitive characteristics jointly affect visual perception. A total of 120 pairs of solid icons and corresponding outline icons were collected and designed. Subsequently, participants were asked to rate icons based on familiarity and concreteness, excluding those that were either too familiar or too unfamiliar. After 27 participants were familiarized with all of the icons over two training sessions, they were required to complete the task of recalling icons with relevant semantic meanings. Finally, to further decompose the users' visual perception process, participants' ability to visually search for icons was additionally tested. The results indicated that participants performed significantly better at recognizing and visually searching for solid icons, especially when they were unfamiliar. However, the visual perception advantage decreased with an increase in familiarity. In addition, strong evidence was found indicating that concrete solid icons have the highest visual search performance. The findings in this study provide practical guidelines for user interface design.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outline or Solid? The Role of Icon Style on User's Perception\",\"authors\":\"Zhangfan Shen,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Moke Li,&nbsp;Jiaxiang Chen,&nbsp;Zhanpeng Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hfm.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Despite the many studies investigated the impact of icon design on usability in the past, few have compared outline icons with solid icons. This study combines familiarity training, recognition tasks, and visual search tasks to explore how icon design style and internal cognitive characteristics jointly affect visual perception. A total of 120 pairs of solid icons and corresponding outline icons were collected and designed. Subsequently, participants were asked to rate icons based on familiarity and concreteness, excluding those that were either too familiar or too unfamiliar. After 27 participants were familiarized with all of the icons over two training sessions, they were required to complete the task of recalling icons with relevant semantic meanings. Finally, to further decompose the users' visual perception process, participants' ability to visually search for icons was additionally tested. The results indicated that participants performed significantly better at recognizing and visually searching for solid icons, especially when they were unfamiliar. However, the visual perception advantage decreased with an increase in familiarity. In addition, strong evidence was found indicating that concrete solid icons have the highest visual search performance. The findings in this study provide practical guidelines for user interface design.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管过去有许多研究调查了图标设计对可用性的影响,但很少有人将轮廓图标与实体图标进行比较。本研究结合熟悉度训练、识别任务和视觉搜索任务,探讨图标设计风格和内部认知特征如何共同影响视觉感知。共收集和设计了120对实体图标和相应的轮廓图标。随后,参与者被要求根据熟悉度和具体程度对图标进行评分,排除那些太熟悉或太不熟悉的图标。27名参与者在两次训练中熟悉了所有的图标后,他们被要求完成回忆具有相关语义的图标的任务。最后,为了进一步分解用户的视觉感知过程,我们还测试了参与者视觉搜索图标的能力。结果表明,参与者在识别和视觉搜索实体图标方面表现得更好,尤其是当他们不熟悉的时候。然而,视觉感知优势随着熟悉度的增加而下降。此外,强有力的证据表明,具体的实体图标具有最高的视觉搜索性能。本研究结果为用户界面设计提供了实用的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outline or Solid? The Role of Icon Style on User's Perception

Despite the many studies investigated the impact of icon design on usability in the past, few have compared outline icons with solid icons. This study combines familiarity training, recognition tasks, and visual search tasks to explore how icon design style and internal cognitive characteristics jointly affect visual perception. A total of 120 pairs of solid icons and corresponding outline icons were collected and designed. Subsequently, participants were asked to rate icons based on familiarity and concreteness, excluding those that were either too familiar or too unfamiliar. After 27 participants were familiarized with all of the icons over two training sessions, they were required to complete the task of recalling icons with relevant semantic meanings. Finally, to further decompose the users' visual perception process, participants' ability to visually search for icons was additionally tested. The results indicated that participants performed significantly better at recognizing and visually searching for solid icons, especially when they were unfamiliar. However, the visual perception advantage decreased with an increase in familiarity. In addition, strong evidence was found indicating that concrete solid icons have the highest visual search performance. The findings in this study provide practical guidelines for user interface design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信