幽门螺杆菌感染与嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎之间的关系:系统回顾与元分析

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Helicobacter Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1111/hel.70038
Lucía Gutiérrez-Ramírez, Sandra L. Garcia-Dionisio, Sara Feo-Ortega, Jesús González-Cervera, Antonio Tejera-Muñoz, Alfredo J. Lucendo, Ángel Arias
{"title":"幽门螺杆菌感染与嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎之间的关系:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Lucía Gutiérrez-Ramírez,&nbsp;Sandra L. Garcia-Dionisio,&nbsp;Sara Feo-Ortega,&nbsp;Jesús González-Cervera,&nbsp;Antonio Tejera-Muñoz,&nbsp;Alfredo J. Lucendo,&nbsp;Ángel Arias","doi":"10.1111/hel.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exposure to <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) has been associated with reduced odds of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in order to quantify the association between <i>H. pylori</i> infection and EoE, and to assess the certainty of the evidence linking both conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (up to September 2024) to identify observational epidemiological studies that assessed the association between objectively measured <i>H. pylori</i> infection and EoE. The risk of study bias was assessed structurally using the ROBINS-E tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen studies comprising 30,650 patients and 291,908 controls were included. Exposure to <i>H. pylori</i> was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of EoE (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46–0.70; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> 50%) [low-certainty evidence]. The protective effect of <i>H. pylori</i> was stronger in case–control studies (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35–0.69) than in cohort studies (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–0.98) and was statistically significant in retrospective studies (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.72) and studies with high or very high risk of bias (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42–0.64), but not in prospective studies (OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27–1.18) or those with moderate to low risk of bias (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69–1.21).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The association between <i>H. pylori</i> and EoE is mainly supported by retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. Further well-designed studies are needed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>PROSPERO number: CRD42024586653</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13223,"journal":{"name":"Helicobacter","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Gutiérrez-Ramírez,&nbsp;Sandra L. Garcia-Dionisio,&nbsp;Sara Feo-Ortega,&nbsp;Jesús González-Cervera,&nbsp;Antonio Tejera-Muñoz,&nbsp;Alfredo J. Lucendo,&nbsp;Ángel Arias\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hel.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Exposure to <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) has been associated with reduced odds of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in order to quantify the association between <i>H. pylori</i> infection and EoE, and to assess the certainty of the evidence linking both conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (up to September 2024) to identify observational epidemiological studies that assessed the association between objectively measured <i>H. pylori</i> infection and EoE. The risk of study bias was assessed structurally using the ROBINS-E tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixteen studies comprising 30,650 patients and 291,908 controls were included. Exposure to <i>H. pylori</i> was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of EoE (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46–0.70; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> 50%) [low-certainty evidence]. The protective effect of <i>H. pylori</i> was stronger in case–control studies (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35–0.69) than in cohort studies (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–0.98) and was statistically significant in retrospective studies (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.72) and studies with high or very high risk of bias (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42–0.64), but not in prospective studies (OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27–1.18) or those with moderate to low risk of bias (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69–1.21).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The association between <i>H. pylori</i> and EoE is mainly supported by retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. Further well-designed studies are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>PROSPERO number: CRD42024586653</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Helicobacter\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Helicobacter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.70038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helicobacter","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.70038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴露于幽门螺杆菌(h.p ylori)与嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)的发生率降低有关。目的对流行病学研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化幽门螺杆菌感染与EoE之间的关系,并评估两者相关证据的确定性。方法在MEDLINE/PUBMED、EMBASE和SCOPUS数据库(截止2024年9月)中进行全面的文献检索,以确定观察性流行病学研究,评估客观测量的幽门螺杆菌感染与EoE之间的关系。采用ROBINS-E工具对研究偏倚风险进行结构性评估。采用随机效应荟萃分析汇总数据。使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。结果纳入16项研究,包括30,650例患者和291,908例对照。幽门螺杆菌暴露与EoE发生率显著降低相关(合并优势比[OR] 0.56;95% ci, 0.46-0.70;I2 50%)[低确定性证据]。在病例对照研究中,幽门螺杆菌的保护作用更强(OR 0.49;95% CI, 0.35-0.69)比队列研究(OR 0.76;95% CI, 0.58-0.98),在回顾性研究中具有统计学意义(OR 0.57;95% CI, 0.45-0.72)和高或非常高偏倚风险的研究(or 0.52;95% CI, 0.42-0.64),但在前瞻性研究中没有(OR 0.56;95% CI, 0.27-1.18)或中低偏倚风险(or, 0.91;95% ci, 0.69-1.21)。结论幽门螺杆菌与EoE的相关性主要由具有高偏倚风险的回顾性研究支持。需要进一步精心设计的研究。试验注册号:CRD42024586653
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Exposure to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been associated with reduced odds of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Aims

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in order to quantify the association between H. pylori infection and EoE, and to assess the certainty of the evidence linking both conditions.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (up to September 2024) to identify observational epidemiological studies that assessed the association between objectively measured H. pylori infection and EoE. The risk of study bias was assessed structurally using the ROBINS-E tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results

Sixteen studies comprising 30,650 patients and 291,908 controls were included. Exposure to H. pylori was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of EoE (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46–0.70; I2 50%) [low-certainty evidence]. The protective effect of H. pylori was stronger in case–control studies (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35–0.69) than in cohort studies (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–0.98) and was statistically significant in retrospective studies (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.72) and studies with high or very high risk of bias (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42–0.64), but not in prospective studies (OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27–1.18) or those with moderate to low risk of bias (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69–1.21).

Conclusions

The association between H. pylori and EoE is mainly supported by retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. Further well-designed studies are needed.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO number: CRD42024586653

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Helicobacter
Helicobacter 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Helicobacter is edited by Professor David Y Graham. The editorial and peer review process is an independent process. Whenever there is a conflict of interest, the editor and editorial board will declare their interests and affiliations. Helicobacter recognises the critical role that has been established for Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma. As new helicobacter species are now regularly being discovered, Helicobacter covers the entire range of helicobacter research, increasing communication among the fields of gastroenterology; microbiology; vaccine development; laboratory animal science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信