利用海底节点地震解释解决孟买海上成熟油田的关键问题

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Uday Shanker Mishra, Saumya Kanti Goswami, Souvik Sengupta, Subhankar Basu, Srilata Mohapatra, Anand Prakash
{"title":"利用海底节点地震解释解决孟买海上成熟油田的关键问题","authors":"Uday Shanker Mishra,&nbsp;Saumya Kanti Goswami,&nbsp;Souvik Sengupta,&nbsp;Subhankar Basu,&nbsp;Srilata Mohapatra,&nbsp;Anand Prakash","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neelam–Heera fields are located in Mumbai offshore basin and are significant contributors to India's oil and gas production. These mature oil and gas fields are producing mainly from Eocene–Oligocene carbonate reservoirs. Key challenges of Neelam–Heera fields include seismic imaging issues in areas perturbed by shallow gas, discrepancy in time and depth structures caused by lateral and vertical velocity variations and delineation of karst/discontinuities in the Neelam–Bassein formation to improve well planning and avoid mud loss. The seismic interpretation study we conducted used recent ocean bottom node seismic data to provide new insights into these challenges and are discussed in this paper. An integrated study scaling from interpretive processing to high-resolution mapping/attribute analysis was conducted to solve the key challenges of the Neelam–Heera fields. A significant improvement is seen in the imaging of the Neelam–Heera area because of prestack depth migration processing of ocean bottom node data, which led to detailed mapping and better understanding of various formations. One of the key challenges was to understand the structural changes in areas masked by shallow gas clouds in the Heera high area. The PP data could not provide clear imaging of areas masked by shallow gas; however, the PS data is not affected by fluid presence and provided imaging below the gas cloud. The gas-bearing Bandra formation in the crestal part of the Heera field is mapped with the help of PS data. The Neelam–Heera area shows prominent trends related to a velocity anomaly at a shallow level (dissolution features), forming the valleys in the time cube that are not seen in the depth cube. The key formations are mapped carefully with the integration of a depth cube. The new depth maps provided insights in areas hindered by previous false structures and are key to future development planning. To gain insights on karstification and mud-loss issues in Neelam field (Bassein formation), various structural attributes were derived and correlated with well data. Most positive/negative curvature attributes at different azimuthal stacks alongside variance maps provided detailed high-resolution insights on faults/lineaments/fractures, and posting of well mud-loss information validated the disturbed-zone-related mud-loss areas. The availability of ocean bottom node data with high-quality processing and imaging and subsequent detailed seismic interpretation using PP and PS data provided new insights to solve the key challenges of Neelam–Heera fields. The key outcome of this study includes an improved understanding of areas perturbed by shallow gas and better depth maps for integration into the future development model in areas with discrepancies caused by significant lateral and vertical velocity variations. In addition, we were better able to delineate karst/discontinuities in the Neelam–Bassein formation, which improved well planning and helped avoid mud loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":"73 4","pages":"1204-1211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving key issues of mature Mumbai offshore fields using ocean bottom node seismic interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Uday Shanker Mishra,&nbsp;Saumya Kanti Goswami,&nbsp;Souvik Sengupta,&nbsp;Subhankar Basu,&nbsp;Srilata Mohapatra,&nbsp;Anand Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2478.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Neelam–Heera fields are located in Mumbai offshore basin and are significant contributors to India's oil and gas production. These mature oil and gas fields are producing mainly from Eocene–Oligocene carbonate reservoirs. Key challenges of Neelam–Heera fields include seismic imaging issues in areas perturbed by shallow gas, discrepancy in time and depth structures caused by lateral and vertical velocity variations and delineation of karst/discontinuities in the Neelam–Bassein formation to improve well planning and avoid mud loss. The seismic interpretation study we conducted used recent ocean bottom node seismic data to provide new insights into these challenges and are discussed in this paper. An integrated study scaling from interpretive processing to high-resolution mapping/attribute analysis was conducted to solve the key challenges of the Neelam–Heera fields. A significant improvement is seen in the imaging of the Neelam–Heera area because of prestack depth migration processing of ocean bottom node data, which led to detailed mapping and better understanding of various formations. One of the key challenges was to understand the structural changes in areas masked by shallow gas clouds in the Heera high area. The PP data could not provide clear imaging of areas masked by shallow gas; however, the PS data is not affected by fluid presence and provided imaging below the gas cloud. The gas-bearing Bandra formation in the crestal part of the Heera field is mapped with the help of PS data. The Neelam–Heera area shows prominent trends related to a velocity anomaly at a shallow level (dissolution features), forming the valleys in the time cube that are not seen in the depth cube. The key formations are mapped carefully with the integration of a depth cube. The new depth maps provided insights in areas hindered by previous false structures and are key to future development planning. To gain insights on karstification and mud-loss issues in Neelam field (Bassein formation), various structural attributes were derived and correlated with well data. Most positive/negative curvature attributes at different azimuthal stacks alongside variance maps provided detailed high-resolution insights on faults/lineaments/fractures, and posting of well mud-loss information validated the disturbed-zone-related mud-loss areas. The availability of ocean bottom node data with high-quality processing and imaging and subsequent detailed seismic interpretation using PP and PS data provided new insights to solve the key challenges of Neelam–Heera fields. The key outcome of this study includes an improved understanding of areas perturbed by shallow gas and better depth maps for integration into the future development model in areas with discrepancies caused by significant lateral and vertical velocity variations. In addition, we were better able to delineate karst/discontinuities in the Neelam–Bassein formation, which improved well planning and helped avoid mud loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Prospecting\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"1204-1211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Prospecting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.70003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Neelam-Heera油田位于孟买海上盆地,是印度油气产量的重要贡献者。这些成熟油气田主要产自始新统—渐新统碳酸盐岩储层。Neelam-Heera油田面临的主要挑战包括:受浅层天然气干扰地区的地震成像问题、横向和垂直速度变化导致的时间和深度结构差异,以及Neelam-Bassein地层中岩溶/不连续层的圈定,以改进井规划和避免泥浆漏失。我们进行的地震解释研究使用了最近的海底节点地震数据,为这些挑战提供了新的见解,并在本文中进行了讨论。为了解决Neelam-Heera油田面临的主要挑战,研究人员开展了从解释处理到高分辨率制图/属性分析的综合研究。由于海底节点数据的叠前深度偏移处理,Neelam-Heera地区的成像有了显着改善,从而可以更详细地绘制和更好地了解各种地层。其中一个关键的挑战是了解Heera高区被浅气体云掩盖的区域的结构变化。PP数据不能提供浅层气体遮挡区域的清晰成像;然而,PS数据不受流体存在的影响,并提供了气体云下方的成像。利用PS资料对Heera油田顶部的Bandra组进行了含气圈定。Neelam-Heera地区显示出与浅层速度异常(溶解特征)相关的显著趋势,形成了在深度立方体中看不到的时间立方体中的山谷。通过深度立方体的整合,仔细地绘制了关键地层。新的深度图提供了以前被错误结构阻碍的区域的洞察力,并且是未来发展规划的关键。为了深入了解Neelam油田(Bassein地层)的岩溶作用和泥浆漏失问题,研究人员导出了各种结构属性,并将其与井数据进行了对比。在不同方位叠加上的大多数正/负曲率属性以及方差图提供了断层/轮廓/裂缝的详细高分辨率信息,并发布了井泥损失信息,验证了与扰动带相关的泥损失区域。海底节点数据的高质量处理和成像,以及随后使用PP和PS数据进行详细的地震解释,为解决Neelam-Heera油田的关键挑战提供了新的见解。该研究的主要成果包括提高了对受浅层天然气干扰区域的理解,以及更好的深度图,以便在显著的横向和垂直速度变化造成差异的区域整合到未来的开发模型中。此外,我们能够更好地描绘Neelam-Bassein地层中的岩溶/不连续面,从而改进了井的规划,并有助于避免泥浆漏失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resolving key issues of mature Mumbai offshore fields using ocean bottom node seismic interpretation

Neelam–Heera fields are located in Mumbai offshore basin and are significant contributors to India's oil and gas production. These mature oil and gas fields are producing mainly from Eocene–Oligocene carbonate reservoirs. Key challenges of Neelam–Heera fields include seismic imaging issues in areas perturbed by shallow gas, discrepancy in time and depth structures caused by lateral and vertical velocity variations and delineation of karst/discontinuities in the Neelam–Bassein formation to improve well planning and avoid mud loss. The seismic interpretation study we conducted used recent ocean bottom node seismic data to provide new insights into these challenges and are discussed in this paper. An integrated study scaling from interpretive processing to high-resolution mapping/attribute analysis was conducted to solve the key challenges of the Neelam–Heera fields. A significant improvement is seen in the imaging of the Neelam–Heera area because of prestack depth migration processing of ocean bottom node data, which led to detailed mapping and better understanding of various formations. One of the key challenges was to understand the structural changes in areas masked by shallow gas clouds in the Heera high area. The PP data could not provide clear imaging of areas masked by shallow gas; however, the PS data is not affected by fluid presence and provided imaging below the gas cloud. The gas-bearing Bandra formation in the crestal part of the Heera field is mapped with the help of PS data. The Neelam–Heera area shows prominent trends related to a velocity anomaly at a shallow level (dissolution features), forming the valleys in the time cube that are not seen in the depth cube. The key formations are mapped carefully with the integration of a depth cube. The new depth maps provided insights in areas hindered by previous false structures and are key to future development planning. To gain insights on karstification and mud-loss issues in Neelam field (Bassein formation), various structural attributes were derived and correlated with well data. Most positive/negative curvature attributes at different azimuthal stacks alongside variance maps provided detailed high-resolution insights on faults/lineaments/fractures, and posting of well mud-loss information validated the disturbed-zone-related mud-loss areas. The availability of ocean bottom node data with high-quality processing and imaging and subsequent detailed seismic interpretation using PP and PS data provided new insights to solve the key challenges of Neelam–Heera fields. The key outcome of this study includes an improved understanding of areas perturbed by shallow gas and better depth maps for integration into the future development model in areas with discrepancies caused by significant lateral and vertical velocity variations. In addition, we were better able to delineate karst/discontinuities in the Neelam–Bassein formation, which improved well planning and helped avoid mud loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信