中频变压器绝缘优化程序电场计算方法的比较

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Bastian Korthauer;Jürgen Biela
{"title":"中频变压器绝缘优化程序电场计算方法的比较","authors":"Bastian Korthauer;Jürgen Biela","doi":"10.1109/OJPEL.2025.3554299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the insulation volume of medium-frequency transformers (MFTs) typically constitutes a significant fraction of the overall transformer volume, design routines focusing on optimizing insulation are crucial. Such optimization requires fast and accurate electric field computations in several critical regions of the MFT, making the choice of effective computation methods essential. This paper compares suitable methods, including the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation (SCT), the charge simulation method (CSM), and commonly used analytical approaches, by benchmarking them against nearly 4000 finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. Each method's error is analyzed, and a sensitivity study is performed to define the parameter ranges where each method yields accurate results. The CSM is found to provide the most accurate field computation (<inline-formula><tex-math>$&lt; $</tex-math></inline-formula>5% error) across all examined critical regions. However, to compensate for its increased computation time for geometries with rectangular conductors, combining the CSM with the SCT – which is approximately 10 times faster – is recommended to achieve optimal performance.","PeriodicalId":93182,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of power electronics","volume":"6 ","pages":"630-646"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10938224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Electric Field Calculation Methods for Optimization Routines to Design Medium-Frequency Transformer Insulation\",\"authors\":\"Bastian Korthauer;Jürgen Biela\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJPEL.2025.3554299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the insulation volume of medium-frequency transformers (MFTs) typically constitutes a significant fraction of the overall transformer volume, design routines focusing on optimizing insulation are crucial. Such optimization requires fast and accurate electric field computations in several critical regions of the MFT, making the choice of effective computation methods essential. This paper compares suitable methods, including the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation (SCT), the charge simulation method (CSM), and commonly used analytical approaches, by benchmarking them against nearly 4000 finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. Each method's error is analyzed, and a sensitivity study is performed to define the parameter ranges where each method yields accurate results. The CSM is found to provide the most accurate field computation (<inline-formula><tex-math>$&lt; $</tex-math></inline-formula>5% error) across all examined critical regions. However, to compensate for its increased computation time for geometries with rectangular conductors, combining the CSM with the SCT – which is approximately 10 times faster – is recommended to achieve optimal performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE open journal of power electronics\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"630-646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10938224\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE open journal of power electronics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10938224/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of power electronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10938224/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于中频变压器(MFT)的绝缘体积通常占整个变压器体积的很大一部分,因此以优化绝缘为重点的设计例程至关重要。这种优化需要在中频变压器的几个关键区域进行快速准确的电场计算,因此选择有效的计算方法至关重要。本文以近 4000 次有限元分析 (FEA) 模拟为基准,比较了合适的方法,包括施瓦茨-克里斯托弗变换 (SCT)、电荷模拟法 (CSM) 和常用的分析方法。对每种方法的误差进行了分析,并进行了敏感性研究,以确定每种方法都能得出准确结果的参数范围。研究发现,在所有考察的临界区域中,CSM 的现场计算结果最为精确(误差为 5%)。然而,为了弥补矩形导体几何结构计算时间的增加,建议将 CSM 与 SCT(速度约快 10 倍)相结合,以获得最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Electric Field Calculation Methods for Optimization Routines to Design Medium-Frequency Transformer Insulation
Since the insulation volume of medium-frequency transformers (MFTs) typically constitutes a significant fraction of the overall transformer volume, design routines focusing on optimizing insulation are crucial. Such optimization requires fast and accurate electric field computations in several critical regions of the MFT, making the choice of effective computation methods essential. This paper compares suitable methods, including the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation (SCT), the charge simulation method (CSM), and commonly used analytical approaches, by benchmarking them against nearly 4000 finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. Each method's error is analyzed, and a sensitivity study is performed to define the parameter ranges where each method yields accurate results. The CSM is found to provide the most accurate field computation ($< $5% error) across all examined critical regions. However, to compensate for its increased computation time for geometries with rectangular conductors, combining the CSM with the SCT – which is approximately 10 times faster – is recommended to achieve optimal performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信