Eva Gnugesser , Marlies Jöllenbeck , Wiebke Schlenger , Elke Ochsmann
{"title":"引领数字化转型:数字化社会关怀中的工作条件和员工健康","authors":"Eva Gnugesser , Marlies Jöllenbeck , Wiebke Schlenger , Elke Ochsmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of online counselling in social care, a development that may permanently alter professional practices. However, the full extent of its utilisation, associated occupational risks, and impacts on health remain underexplored. This study investigates the effects of digitisation on the traditionally face-to-face profession of counselling. We conducted a cross-sectional web survey involving 1049 German counsellors to examine the prevalence of online counselling, remote work, and their associations with occupational risks and health outcomes such as musculoskeletal symptoms, cognitive fatigue, and sleep disorders. Our analysis utilised Kruskal-Wallis tests and multiple regression. Findings reveal that only 9.5 % of participants belonged to the high user group, yet high online usage was associated with more favourable working conditions, including lower emotional burden (<em>p</em> = 0.01), and reduced cognitive fatigue (<em>b</em> = 0.22, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and sleep disorders (<em>b</em> = 0.17, <em>p</em> = 0.004) compared to medium users. Engaging in remote work more than once a week was linked to lower cognitive fatigue compared to doing so up to once a week (<em>b</em> = 0.10, <em>p</em> = 0.03). No correlation was observed between musculoskeletal symptoms and the frequency of online counselling or remote work. These results indicate that online counselling could enhance working conditions, although initial increases in cognitive fatigue may occur as counsellors adapt. The findings underscore the need for continued efforts to improve digital working conditions in social care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100706"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the digital shift: Working conditions and employee health in digital social care\",\"authors\":\"Eva Gnugesser , Marlies Jöllenbeck , Wiebke Schlenger , Elke Ochsmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of online counselling in social care, a development that may permanently alter professional practices. However, the full extent of its utilisation, associated occupational risks, and impacts on health remain underexplored. This study investigates the effects of digitisation on the traditionally face-to-face profession of counselling. We conducted a cross-sectional web survey involving 1049 German counsellors to examine the prevalence of online counselling, remote work, and their associations with occupational risks and health outcomes such as musculoskeletal symptoms, cognitive fatigue, and sleep disorders. Our analysis utilised Kruskal-Wallis tests and multiple regression. Findings reveal that only 9.5 % of participants belonged to the high user group, yet high online usage was associated with more favourable working conditions, including lower emotional burden (<em>p</em> = 0.01), and reduced cognitive fatigue (<em>b</em> = 0.22, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and sleep disorders (<em>b</em> = 0.17, <em>p</em> = 0.004) compared to medium users. Engaging in remote work more than once a week was linked to lower cognitive fatigue compared to doing so up to once a week (<em>b</em> = 0.10, <em>p</em> = 0.03). No correlation was observed between musculoskeletal symptoms and the frequency of online counselling or remote work. These results indicate that online counselling could enhance working conditions, although initial increases in cognitive fatigue may occur as counsellors adapt. The findings underscore the need for continued efforts to improve digital working conditions in social care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000563\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了在社会护理中采用在线咨询,这一发展可能永久性地改变专业做法。然而,对其充分利用的程度、相关的职业风险和对健康的影响仍未充分探讨。这项研究调查了数字化对传统的面对面咨询职业的影响。我们进行了一项涉及1049名德国咨询师的横断面网络调查,以检查在线咨询、远程工作的流行程度,以及它们与职业风险和健康结果(如肌肉骨骼症状、认知疲劳和睡眠障碍)的关系。我们的分析使用了Kruskal-Wallis检验和多元回归。研究结果显示,只有9.5%的参与者属于高用户组,但高网络使用率与更有利的工作条件有关,包括较低的情绪负担(p = 0.01)和减少认知疲劳(b = 0.22, p <;0.001)和睡眠障碍(b = 0.17, p = 0.004)。每周远程工作一次以上与每周远程工作一次相比,认知疲劳程度更低(b = 0.10, p = 0.03)。肌肉骨骼症状与在线咨询或远程工作的频率之间没有相关性。这些结果表明,在线咨询可以改善工作条件,尽管最初的认知疲劳可能会随着咨询师的适应而增加。研究结果强调,需要继续努力改善社会护理领域的数字化工作条件。
Navigating the digital shift: Working conditions and employee health in digital social care
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of online counselling in social care, a development that may permanently alter professional practices. However, the full extent of its utilisation, associated occupational risks, and impacts on health remain underexplored. This study investigates the effects of digitisation on the traditionally face-to-face profession of counselling. We conducted a cross-sectional web survey involving 1049 German counsellors to examine the prevalence of online counselling, remote work, and their associations with occupational risks and health outcomes such as musculoskeletal symptoms, cognitive fatigue, and sleep disorders. Our analysis utilised Kruskal-Wallis tests and multiple regression. Findings reveal that only 9.5 % of participants belonged to the high user group, yet high online usage was associated with more favourable working conditions, including lower emotional burden (p = 0.01), and reduced cognitive fatigue (b = 0.22, p < 0.001) and sleep disorders (b = 0.17, p = 0.004) compared to medium users. Engaging in remote work more than once a week was linked to lower cognitive fatigue compared to doing so up to once a week (b = 0.10, p = 0.03). No correlation was observed between musculoskeletal symptoms and the frequency of online counselling or remote work. These results indicate that online counselling could enhance working conditions, although initial increases in cognitive fatigue may occur as counsellors adapt. The findings underscore the need for continued efforts to improve digital working conditions in social care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.