Robert A. Slesak , Michelle C. Agne , Constance A. Harrington , Matthew D. Powers
{"title":"美国太平洋西北地区造林过程中树木间距对三种重要树种生存和生长的长期影响","authors":"Robert A. Slesak , Michelle C. Agne , Constance A. Harrington , Matthew D. Powers","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tree spacing during reforestation is a critical decision that influences the trajectory and rate of stand development over time, but there is limited quantification of responses at meaningful time scales for management. Here we report on ∼40 year response of coast Douglas-fir (DF, <em>Pseudotsuga menziesii</em> var. <em>menziesii</em>), noble fir (NF, <em>Abies procera</em>) and western white pine (WWP, <em>Pinus monticola</em>) to five or six spacing treatments that ranged from 1 to 6 m in the western Cascades of Washington, USA. Spacing effects were tested separately for each species in completely randomized designs applied to 0.4 ha plots with 4–6 replications per treatment. There was no effect of spacing on relative survival in WWP and NF; for DF, relative survival decreased with decreasing spacing, with the effect becoming more pronounced with time. Quadratic mean diameter generally increased with increasing spacing for WWP and DF, but the effect attenuated at 4-m spacing and higher. Total stand volume was inversely related to spacing for all species for much of the study period, but there was no difference in volume among spacings for DF in the most recent measurement because of the density-dependent mortality in narrow spacings as Stand Density Index increased above 55 % of maximum. Our findings indicate that wider spacings (5–6-m) promote the development of larger trees with more complex stand structure (including that arising from ingrowth), while spacings of 3–4-m will maximize wood production. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of management objectives, silvicultural resource constraints, and species-specific considerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"586 ","pages":"Article 122724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effects of tree spacing during reforestation on survival and growth of three important tree species in the Pacific Northwest, USA\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Slesak , Michelle C. Agne , Constance A. Harrington , Matthew D. Powers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tree spacing during reforestation is a critical decision that influences the trajectory and rate of stand development over time, but there is limited quantification of responses at meaningful time scales for management. Here we report on ∼40 year response of coast Douglas-fir (DF, <em>Pseudotsuga menziesii</em> var. <em>menziesii</em>), noble fir (NF, <em>Abies procera</em>) and western white pine (WWP, <em>Pinus monticola</em>) to five or six spacing treatments that ranged from 1 to 6 m in the western Cascades of Washington, USA. Spacing effects were tested separately for each species in completely randomized designs applied to 0.4 ha plots with 4–6 replications per treatment. There was no effect of spacing on relative survival in WWP and NF; for DF, relative survival decreased with decreasing spacing, with the effect becoming more pronounced with time. Quadratic mean diameter generally increased with increasing spacing for WWP and DF, but the effect attenuated at 4-m spacing and higher. Total stand volume was inversely related to spacing for all species for much of the study period, but there was no difference in volume among spacings for DF in the most recent measurement because of the density-dependent mortality in narrow spacings as Stand Density Index increased above 55 % of maximum. Our findings indicate that wider spacings (5–6-m) promote the development of larger trees with more complex stand structure (including that arising from ingrowth), while spacings of 3–4-m will maximize wood production. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of management objectives, silvicultural resource constraints, and species-specific considerations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"586 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725002324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725002324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term effects of tree spacing during reforestation on survival and growth of three important tree species in the Pacific Northwest, USA
Tree spacing during reforestation is a critical decision that influences the trajectory and rate of stand development over time, but there is limited quantification of responses at meaningful time scales for management. Here we report on ∼40 year response of coast Douglas-fir (DF, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii), noble fir (NF, Abies procera) and western white pine (WWP, Pinus monticola) to five or six spacing treatments that ranged from 1 to 6 m in the western Cascades of Washington, USA. Spacing effects were tested separately for each species in completely randomized designs applied to 0.4 ha plots with 4–6 replications per treatment. There was no effect of spacing on relative survival in WWP and NF; for DF, relative survival decreased with decreasing spacing, with the effect becoming more pronounced with time. Quadratic mean diameter generally increased with increasing spacing for WWP and DF, but the effect attenuated at 4-m spacing and higher. Total stand volume was inversely related to spacing for all species for much of the study period, but there was no difference in volume among spacings for DF in the most recent measurement because of the density-dependent mortality in narrow spacings as Stand Density Index increased above 55 % of maximum. Our findings indicate that wider spacings (5–6-m) promote the development of larger trees with more complex stand structure (including that arising from ingrowth), while spacings of 3–4-m will maximize wood production. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of management objectives, silvicultural resource constraints, and species-specific considerations.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.