{"title":"临床门诊患者对触摸的渴望与ct优化触摸的替代感知","authors":"B. Hasenack , B. Montagne , A. Keizer","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Longing for touch (LFT) can be defined as a discrepancy between the amount of touch that is desired and received. Previous studies have shown that LFT is prevalent in non-clinical populations, and that it is associated with an altered perception of CT-optimal touch. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential perceptual consequences of LFT in clinical populations. It is important to investigate this given the complicated relation with social touch that is often observed in these populations. We therefore assessed LFT in 69 clinical outpatients and 136 control participants in this study. Two videos were used to evaluate the vicarious perception of CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT non-optimal touch (30 cm/s). LFT was found to be more prevalent and severe in clinical outpatients. While patients also reported a lower frequency of touch, their subjective touch wish did not differ significantly from control participants. The increased LFT of the patients therefore seems to be primarily driven by an absence of touch, rather than a stronger need for touch. In both groups, LFT was positively associated with the vicarious pleasantness perception of CT-optimal and CT non-optimal touch. This provides further support for the hypothesis that LFT enhances the hedonic value of social touch. Taken together, these results provide valuable new insights into the experience and perception of social touch in clinical populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Pages 205-210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longing for touch and the vicarious perception of CT-optimal touch in clinical outpatients\",\"authors\":\"B. Hasenack , B. Montagne , A. Keizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Longing for touch (LFT) can be defined as a discrepancy between the amount of touch that is desired and received. Previous studies have shown that LFT is prevalent in non-clinical populations, and that it is associated with an altered perception of CT-optimal touch. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential perceptual consequences of LFT in clinical populations. It is important to investigate this given the complicated relation with social touch that is often observed in these populations. We therefore assessed LFT in 69 clinical outpatients and 136 control participants in this study. Two videos were used to evaluate the vicarious perception of CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT non-optimal touch (30 cm/s). LFT was found to be more prevalent and severe in clinical outpatients. While patients also reported a lower frequency of touch, their subjective touch wish did not differ significantly from control participants. The increased LFT of the patients therefore seems to be primarily driven by an absence of touch, rather than a stronger need for touch. In both groups, LFT was positively associated with the vicarious pleasantness perception of CT-optimal and CT non-optimal touch. This provides further support for the hypothesis that LFT enhances the hedonic value of social touch. Taken together, these results provide valuable new insights into the experience and perception of social touch in clinical populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 205-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625002420\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625002420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longing for touch and the vicarious perception of CT-optimal touch in clinical outpatients
Longing for touch (LFT) can be defined as a discrepancy between the amount of touch that is desired and received. Previous studies have shown that LFT is prevalent in non-clinical populations, and that it is associated with an altered perception of CT-optimal touch. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential perceptual consequences of LFT in clinical populations. It is important to investigate this given the complicated relation with social touch that is often observed in these populations. We therefore assessed LFT in 69 clinical outpatients and 136 control participants in this study. Two videos were used to evaluate the vicarious perception of CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT non-optimal touch (30 cm/s). LFT was found to be more prevalent and severe in clinical outpatients. While patients also reported a lower frequency of touch, their subjective touch wish did not differ significantly from control participants. The increased LFT of the patients therefore seems to be primarily driven by an absence of touch, rather than a stronger need for touch. In both groups, LFT was positively associated with the vicarious pleasantness perception of CT-optimal and CT non-optimal touch. This provides further support for the hypothesis that LFT enhances the hedonic value of social touch. Taken together, these results provide valuable new insights into the experience and perception of social touch in clinical populations.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;