临床门诊患者对触摸的渴望与ct优化触摸的替代感知

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
B. Hasenack , B. Montagne , A. Keizer
{"title":"临床门诊患者对触摸的渴望与ct优化触摸的替代感知","authors":"B. Hasenack ,&nbsp;B. Montagne ,&nbsp;A. Keizer","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Longing for touch (LFT) can be defined as a discrepancy between the amount of touch that is desired and received. Previous studies have shown that LFT is prevalent in non-clinical populations, and that it is associated with an altered perception of CT-optimal touch. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential perceptual consequences of LFT in clinical populations. It is important to investigate this given the complicated relation with social touch that is often observed in these populations. We therefore assessed LFT in 69 clinical outpatients and 136 control participants in this study. Two videos were used to evaluate the vicarious perception of CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT non-optimal touch (30 cm/s). LFT was found to be more prevalent and severe in clinical outpatients. While patients also reported a lower frequency of touch, their subjective touch wish did not differ significantly from control participants. The increased LFT of the patients therefore seems to be primarily driven by an absence of touch, rather than a stronger need for touch. In both groups, LFT was positively associated with the vicarious pleasantness perception of CT-optimal and CT non-optimal touch. This provides further support for the hypothesis that LFT enhances the hedonic value of social touch. Taken together, these results provide valuable new insights into the experience and perception of social touch in clinical populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Pages 205-210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longing for touch and the vicarious perception of CT-optimal touch in clinical outpatients\",\"authors\":\"B. Hasenack ,&nbsp;B. Montagne ,&nbsp;A. Keizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Longing for touch (LFT) can be defined as a discrepancy between the amount of touch that is desired and received. Previous studies have shown that LFT is prevalent in non-clinical populations, and that it is associated with an altered perception of CT-optimal touch. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential perceptual consequences of LFT in clinical populations. It is important to investigate this given the complicated relation with social touch that is often observed in these populations. We therefore assessed LFT in 69 clinical outpatients and 136 control participants in this study. Two videos were used to evaluate the vicarious perception of CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT non-optimal touch (30 cm/s). LFT was found to be more prevalent and severe in clinical outpatients. While patients also reported a lower frequency of touch, their subjective touch wish did not differ significantly from control participants. The increased LFT of the patients therefore seems to be primarily driven by an absence of touch, rather than a stronger need for touch. In both groups, LFT was positively associated with the vicarious pleasantness perception of CT-optimal and CT non-optimal touch. This provides further support for the hypothesis that LFT enhances the hedonic value of social touch. Taken together, these results provide valuable new insights into the experience and perception of social touch in clinical populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 205-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625002420\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625002420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

渴望触摸(LFT)可以定义为渴望触摸的数量与接受触摸的数量之间的差异。先前的研究表明,LFT在非临床人群中普遍存在,并且与对ct最佳触摸的感知改变有关。然而,人们对LFT在临床人群中的患病率和潜在的感知后果知之甚少。考虑到在这些人群中经常观察到的与社会接触的复杂关系,调查这一点很重要。因此,我们在本研究中评估了69名临床门诊患者和136名对照参与者的LFT。用两段视频评价CT最佳触摸(3 cm/s)和CT非最佳触摸(30 cm/s)的替代感觉。LFT在临床门诊患者中更为普遍和严重。虽然患者也报告了较低的触摸频率,但他们的主观触摸愿望与对照组参与者没有显着差异。因此,患者LFT的增加似乎主要是由于缺乏触摸,而不是更强烈的触摸需求。在两组中,LFT与CT最佳触摸和CT非最佳触摸的替代愉悦感呈正相关。这进一步支持了LFT增强社交接触的享乐价值的假设。综上所述,这些结果为临床人群对社交接触的体验和感知提供了有价值的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longing for touch and the vicarious perception of CT-optimal touch in clinical outpatients
Longing for touch (LFT) can be defined as a discrepancy between the amount of touch that is desired and received. Previous studies have shown that LFT is prevalent in non-clinical populations, and that it is associated with an altered perception of CT-optimal touch. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential perceptual consequences of LFT in clinical populations. It is important to investigate this given the complicated relation with social touch that is often observed in these populations. We therefore assessed LFT in 69 clinical outpatients and 136 control participants in this study. Two videos were used to evaluate the vicarious perception of CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT non-optimal touch (30 cm/s). LFT was found to be more prevalent and severe in clinical outpatients. While patients also reported a lower frequency of touch, their subjective touch wish did not differ significantly from control participants. The increased LFT of the patients therefore seems to be primarily driven by an absence of touch, rather than a stronger need for touch. In both groups, LFT was positively associated with the vicarious pleasantness perception of CT-optimal and CT non-optimal touch. This provides further support for the hypothesis that LFT enhances the hedonic value of social touch. Taken together, these results provide valuable new insights into the experience and perception of social touch in clinical populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信