详细的废物流和循环率揭示了循环间隙概念的局限性

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Alessio Miatto , Heinz Schandl , Naho Yamashita , Tomer Fishman
{"title":"详细的废物流和循环率揭示了循环间隙概念的局限性","authors":"Alessio Miatto ,&nbsp;Heinz Schandl ,&nbsp;Naho Yamashita ,&nbsp;Tomer Fishman","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent discussions on circular economy metrics, the concepts of circularity rate and circularity gap have gained prominence. Countries have reached different levels of circularity, shaped by differences in their economic structures, yet still leaving a substantial gap. This article examines the limitations of the circularity gap concept, drawing on a counterfactual thought experiment that uses Japan, a leader in the 3Rs initiative, The Netherlands, a model of best practices, and Australia, which just developed its circular economy strategy. We discover that the three countries exhibit distinct levels of current and attainable circularity. However, when circularity is alternatively measured against each country's responsibility for primary material extraction, the three countries are strikingly similar. This outcome highlights the need to reevaluate the circularity gap concept, advocating for a narrative grounded in scientific evidence and reflecting what is realistically achievable for economies with diverse roles within global supply chains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108319"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detailed waste flows and circularity rates reveal the limits of the circularity gap concept\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Miatto ,&nbsp;Heinz Schandl ,&nbsp;Naho Yamashita ,&nbsp;Tomer Fishman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent discussions on circular economy metrics, the concepts of circularity rate and circularity gap have gained prominence. Countries have reached different levels of circularity, shaped by differences in their economic structures, yet still leaving a substantial gap. This article examines the limitations of the circularity gap concept, drawing on a counterfactual thought experiment that uses Japan, a leader in the 3Rs initiative, The Netherlands, a model of best practices, and Australia, which just developed its circular economy strategy. We discover that the three countries exhibit distinct levels of current and attainable circularity. However, when circularity is alternatively measured against each country's responsibility for primary material extraction, the three countries are strikingly similar. This outcome highlights the need to reevaluate the circularity gap concept, advocating for a narrative grounded in scientific evidence and reflecting what is realistically achievable for economies with diverse roles within global supply chains.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001983\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近关于循环经济指标的讨论中,循环率和循环差距的概念得到了突出。由于各国经济结构的差异,各国已达到不同程度的循环,但仍存在巨大差距。本文考察了循环差距概念的局限性,借鉴了一个反事实的思维实验,该实验使用了3r倡议的领导者日本、最佳实践模型荷兰和刚刚制定循环经济战略的澳大利亚。我们发现,这三个国家表现出不同程度的当前和可实现的循环。然而,如果用循环度来衡量每个国家对原材料开采的责任,这三个国家惊人地相似。这一结果凸显了重新评估循环差距概念的必要性,倡导以科学证据为基础的叙述,并反映在全球供应链中扮演不同角色的经济体实际可实现的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Detailed waste flows and circularity rates reveal the limits of the circularity gap concept

Detailed waste flows and circularity rates reveal the limits of the circularity gap concept
In recent discussions on circular economy metrics, the concepts of circularity rate and circularity gap have gained prominence. Countries have reached different levels of circularity, shaped by differences in their economic structures, yet still leaving a substantial gap. This article examines the limitations of the circularity gap concept, drawing on a counterfactual thought experiment that uses Japan, a leader in the 3Rs initiative, The Netherlands, a model of best practices, and Australia, which just developed its circular economy strategy. We discover that the three countries exhibit distinct levels of current and attainable circularity. However, when circularity is alternatively measured against each country's responsibility for primary material extraction, the three countries are strikingly similar. This outcome highlights the need to reevaluate the circularity gap concept, advocating for a narrative grounded in scientific evidence and reflecting what is realistically achievable for economies with diverse roles within global supply chains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信