{"title":"建造还是购买?挪威配电网灵活性服务的市场化","authors":"Outi Pitkänen , Antti Silvast","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electricity grids are expected to play a key role in energy transitions as facilitators that absorb the impacts of transitions in other sectors. This article examines how challenges with strained grid capacity are addressed through making local flexibility markets for trading <em>end-user flexibility</em>. Using the markets-in-the-making approach that conceives markets as framings (Callon, 2016, 2021), we examine the construction of conditions in which flexibility could be sold as a service to distribution grids in Norway. The empirical material analyzed consists of interviews with professionals in 2020–21 and observations from Norwegian Smart Grid Conferences (2020−2022). Our analysis focuses on selected processes seeking to create new frames for market transactions, including how flexibility is framed as an ‘explicit’ good by constructing measurement arrangements; how distribution grid companies are framed as buyers who need flexibility and can evaluate and use the flexibility good; and how framing seeks to make flexibility comparable with grid upgrades. We find that these framing processes seek to engage and transform a large number of actors to construct the evaluation arrangements for flexibility. We discuss how flexibility is framed to enable the articulation of flexibility's active impact on the grid and also to assure that flexibility activation is passive in other respects. We conclude that marketizing flexibility is not best understood as unlocking a vast, pre-existing resource but rather as a process of transforming actors and sociomaterial arrangements to shape flexibility into a knowable object that a wide array of actors can evaluate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104063"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To build or buy? Marketization of flexibility services in the Norwegian distribution grid\",\"authors\":\"Outi Pitkänen , Antti Silvast\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Electricity grids are expected to play a key role in energy transitions as facilitators that absorb the impacts of transitions in other sectors. This article examines how challenges with strained grid capacity are addressed through making local flexibility markets for trading <em>end-user flexibility</em>. Using the markets-in-the-making approach that conceives markets as framings (Callon, 2016, 2021), we examine the construction of conditions in which flexibility could be sold as a service to distribution grids in Norway. The empirical material analyzed consists of interviews with professionals in 2020–21 and observations from Norwegian Smart Grid Conferences (2020−2022). Our analysis focuses on selected processes seeking to create new frames for market transactions, including how flexibility is framed as an ‘explicit’ good by constructing measurement arrangements; how distribution grid companies are framed as buyers who need flexibility and can evaluate and use the flexibility good; and how framing seeks to make flexibility comparable with grid upgrades. We find that these framing processes seek to engage and transform a large number of actors to construct the evaluation arrangements for flexibility. We discuss how flexibility is framed to enable the articulation of flexibility's active impact on the grid and also to assure that flexibility activation is passive in other respects. We conclude that marketizing flexibility is not best understood as unlocking a vast, pre-existing resource but rather as a process of transforming actors and sociomaterial arrangements to shape flexibility into a knowable object that a wide array of actors can evaluate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001446\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
To build or buy? Marketization of flexibility services in the Norwegian distribution grid
Electricity grids are expected to play a key role in energy transitions as facilitators that absorb the impacts of transitions in other sectors. This article examines how challenges with strained grid capacity are addressed through making local flexibility markets for trading end-user flexibility. Using the markets-in-the-making approach that conceives markets as framings (Callon, 2016, 2021), we examine the construction of conditions in which flexibility could be sold as a service to distribution grids in Norway. The empirical material analyzed consists of interviews with professionals in 2020–21 and observations from Norwegian Smart Grid Conferences (2020−2022). Our analysis focuses on selected processes seeking to create new frames for market transactions, including how flexibility is framed as an ‘explicit’ good by constructing measurement arrangements; how distribution grid companies are framed as buyers who need flexibility and can evaluate and use the flexibility good; and how framing seeks to make flexibility comparable with grid upgrades. We find that these framing processes seek to engage and transform a large number of actors to construct the evaluation arrangements for flexibility. We discuss how flexibility is framed to enable the articulation of flexibility's active impact on the grid and also to assure that flexibility activation is passive in other respects. We conclude that marketizing flexibility is not best understood as unlocking a vast, pre-existing resource but rather as a process of transforming actors and sociomaterial arrangements to shape flexibility into a knowable object that a wide array of actors can evaluate.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.