愿意支付采矿后景观恢复费用

Q2 Environmental Science
José Jeremias Ganhane
{"title":"愿意支付采矿后景观恢复费用","authors":"José Jeremias Ganhane","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the long-run impacts of mining-induced displacement and resettlement and uses the contingent valuation method to estimate displaced and resettled Mozambican households’ willingness to pay (measured in labour) to restore the landscape where they used to live before mining began there. Previous studies found that resettlement worsened the welfare of the communities affected, but these studies have generally been conducted shortly after the resettlements concerned had taken place while this study looks at longer-run impacts. The study results indicate that, on average, households were willing to contribute about nine working days per month. The results further indicate that resettled respondents had been adaptive and had used the monetary compensation they were given for resettlement to buy productive land to offset that lost due to resettlement. However, they still saw themselves as worse off than before their relocation. One explanation for this is that they are now far from marketplaces and the river, making it difficult to develop new sources of income and have access to water. Mitigation interventions and future resettlements should therefore think more carefully about selecting resettlement sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to pay for post-mining landscape restoration\",\"authors\":\"José Jeremias Ganhane\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the long-run impacts of mining-induced displacement and resettlement and uses the contingent valuation method to estimate displaced and resettled Mozambican households’ willingness to pay (measured in labour) to restore the landscape where they used to live before mining began there. Previous studies found that resettlement worsened the welfare of the communities affected, but these studies have generally been conducted shortly after the resettlements concerned had taken place while this study looks at longer-run impacts. The study results indicate that, on average, households were willing to contribute about nine working days per month. The results further indicate that resettled respondents had been adaptive and had used the monetary compensation they were given for resettlement to buy productive land to offset that lost due to resettlement. However, they still saw themselves as worse off than before their relocation. One explanation for this is that they are now far from marketplaces and the river, making it difficult to develop new sources of income and have access to water. Mitigation interventions and future resettlements should therefore think more carefully about selecting resettlement sites.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了采矿引起的流离失所和重新安置的长期影响,并使用条件评估方法来估计流离失所和重新安置的莫桑比克家庭支付(以劳动力衡量)以恢复采矿开始前他们曾经居住的景观的意愿。以前的研究发现,重新安置会使受影响社区的福利恶化,但这些研究通常是在有关重新安置发生后不久进行的,而本研究则着眼于长期影响。研究结果显示,平均而言,家庭每月愿意贡献约9个工作日。结果进一步表明,被重新安置的回答者具有适应性,并利用重新安置给予的货币补偿购买生产性土地,以抵消因重新安置而造成的损失。然而,他们仍然认为自己的处境比搬迁前更糟。对此的一种解释是,他们现在远离市场和河流,很难开发新的收入来源,也很难获得水。因此,缓解干预措施和未来的重新安置应更仔细地考虑选择重新安置地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Willingness to pay for post-mining landscape restoration
This paper examines the long-run impacts of mining-induced displacement and resettlement and uses the contingent valuation method to estimate displaced and resettled Mozambican households’ willingness to pay (measured in labour) to restore the landscape where they used to live before mining began there. Previous studies found that resettlement worsened the welfare of the communities affected, but these studies have generally been conducted shortly after the resettlements concerned had taken place while this study looks at longer-run impacts. The study results indicate that, on average, households were willing to contribute about nine working days per month. The results further indicate that resettled respondents had been adaptive and had used the monetary compensation they were given for resettlement to buy productive land to offset that lost due to resettlement. However, they still saw themselves as worse off than before their relocation. One explanation for this is that they are now far from marketplaces and the river, making it difficult to develop new sources of income and have access to water. Mitigation interventions and future resettlements should therefore think more carefully about selecting resettlement sites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信