在一个国家公园里,车辆碰撞和游客干扰降低了袋鼠的存活率和繁殖成功率

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kelly Forrester , Rachel Bergeron , Simon Coroller-Chouraki , David M. Forsyth , Marco Festa-Bianchet , Wendy J. King
{"title":"在一个国家公园里,车辆碰撞和游客干扰降低了袋鼠的存活率和繁殖成功率","authors":"Kelly Forrester ,&nbsp;Rachel Bergeron ,&nbsp;Simon Coroller-Chouraki ,&nbsp;David M. Forsyth ,&nbsp;Marco Festa-Bianchet ,&nbsp;Wendy J. King","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many protected areas provide opportunities for people to view wildlife using roads and walking trails. The impacts of roads and trails on wildlife populations, however, have seldom been investigated by examining their consequences on individual animals. We studied the impacts of a road and use of a wildlife viewing trail on eastern grey kangaroos (<em>Macropus giganteus</em>) in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Australia. We analyzed 11 years of data from 433 marked individuals to quantify road mortality, and how distance from the road, where the walking trail started, affected survival, movement, and reproductive success. Kangaroos in the west of the study area, nearer the road and around a popular wildlife viewing trail, showed increased mobility, more vehicle-associated mortality, and decreased weaning success and survival, compared to kangaroos in the east that were exposed to substantially fewer visitors. Mature males, the sex-age class most likely to be killed by vehicles, had a 51 % higher probability of road mortality at the western than at the eastern end, contributing to a 47 % decrease in overall survival. Prime-aged females at the western end of the study area, where they experienced frequent exposure to visitors, had a 45 % lower probability of weaning a young compared to females in the east of the study area. Managers should consider these undesirable impacts when planning how to encourage people to interact with wildlife in protected areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"307 ","pages":"Article 111159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vehicle collisions and visitor disturbance reduce survival and reproductive success of kangaroos in a national park\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Forrester ,&nbsp;Rachel Bergeron ,&nbsp;Simon Coroller-Chouraki ,&nbsp;David M. Forsyth ,&nbsp;Marco Festa-Bianchet ,&nbsp;Wendy J. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many protected areas provide opportunities for people to view wildlife using roads and walking trails. The impacts of roads and trails on wildlife populations, however, have seldom been investigated by examining their consequences on individual animals. We studied the impacts of a road and use of a wildlife viewing trail on eastern grey kangaroos (<em>Macropus giganteus</em>) in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Australia. We analyzed 11 years of data from 433 marked individuals to quantify road mortality, and how distance from the road, where the walking trail started, affected survival, movement, and reproductive success. Kangaroos in the west of the study area, nearer the road and around a popular wildlife viewing trail, showed increased mobility, more vehicle-associated mortality, and decreased weaning success and survival, compared to kangaroos in the east that were exposed to substantially fewer visitors. Mature males, the sex-age class most likely to be killed by vehicles, had a 51 % higher probability of road mortality at the western than at the eastern end, contributing to a 47 % decrease in overall survival. Prime-aged females at the western end of the study area, where they experienced frequent exposure to visitors, had a 45 % lower probability of weaning a young compared to females in the east of the study area. Managers should consider these undesirable impacts when planning how to encourage people to interact with wildlife in protected areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"307 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072500196X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072500196X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多保护区为人们提供了通过公路和步道观赏野生动物的机会。然而,道路和小径对野生动物种群的影响很少通过检查它们对单个动物的影响来进行调查。我们研究了澳大利亚威尔逊海岬国家公园的道路和野生动物观赏径对东部灰袋鼠(Macropus giganteus)的影响。我们分析了来自433个标记个体的11年数据,以量化道路死亡率,以及与道路的距离(步行路线的起点)如何影响生存、运动和繁殖成功率。研究区域西部的袋鼠,靠近公路和一条受欢迎的野生动物观赏路线,与接触较少游客的东部袋鼠相比,它们表现出更高的机动性,更多的车辆相关死亡率,断奶成功率和存活率都有所下降。成年男性是最容易被车辆撞死的性别年龄阶层,在西部的道路死亡率比东部高51%,导致总体存活率下降47%。研究区西端的壮年雌鼠经常与来访者接触,与研究区东端的雌鼠相比,它们断奶的可能性要低45%。在规划如何鼓励人们与保护区的野生动物互动时,管理者应该考虑到这些不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Vehicle collisions and visitor disturbance reduce survival and reproductive success of kangaroos in a national park

Vehicle collisions and visitor disturbance reduce survival and reproductive success of kangaroos in a national park
Many protected areas provide opportunities for people to view wildlife using roads and walking trails. The impacts of roads and trails on wildlife populations, however, have seldom been investigated by examining their consequences on individual animals. We studied the impacts of a road and use of a wildlife viewing trail on eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Australia. We analyzed 11 years of data from 433 marked individuals to quantify road mortality, and how distance from the road, where the walking trail started, affected survival, movement, and reproductive success. Kangaroos in the west of the study area, nearer the road and around a popular wildlife viewing trail, showed increased mobility, more vehicle-associated mortality, and decreased weaning success and survival, compared to kangaroos in the east that were exposed to substantially fewer visitors. Mature males, the sex-age class most likely to be killed by vehicles, had a 51 % higher probability of road mortality at the western than at the eastern end, contributing to a 47 % decrease in overall survival. Prime-aged females at the western end of the study area, where they experienced frequent exposure to visitors, had a 45 % lower probability of weaning a young compared to females in the east of the study area. Managers should consider these undesirable impacts when planning how to encourage people to interact with wildlife in protected areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信