全氟和多氟烷基物质暴露与骨矿物质之间的关系:系统评价和最佳证据合成

Kai Tao, Bin Zeng, Linghui Deng, Wei Zhang, Xianghong Zhou, Yuming Jin, Zilong Zhang, Weichao Huang, Xiaoli Zou, Yu Zhan, Ping Lu, Shi Qiu, Lu Yang* and Qiang Wei*, 
{"title":"全氟和多氟烷基物质暴露与骨矿物质之间的关系:系统评价和最佳证据合成","authors":"Kai Tao,&nbsp;Bin Zeng,&nbsp;Linghui Deng,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Xianghong Zhou,&nbsp;Yuming Jin,&nbsp;Zilong Zhang,&nbsp;Weichao Huang,&nbsp;Xiaoli Zou,&nbsp;Yu Zhan,&nbsp;Ping Lu,&nbsp;Shi Qiu,&nbsp;Lu Yang* and Qiang Wei*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.4c0014310.1021/envhealth.4c00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their bioaccumulative nature. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. This pioneering study aims to assess the effects of different PFAS compounds on bone mineral. We conducted searches on online databases. Inclusion criteria included the presence of associations between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and BMD, BMD z-score, and bone mineral content (BMC). Meta-analyses were performed. Best evidence synthesis (BES) was performed to summarize the results. The results of BES showed that the evidence of PFOS, PFOA and PFNA with reduced bone mineral were moderate. The variability in methods for assessing bone mineral and sex differences are potential sources of heterogeneity in the results. Meta analysis showed that PFOA was associated with BMD (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analysis by sex showed that PFOS (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 50%), PFOA (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to +0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 29%) were negatively correlated with BMD. This systematic review and BES revealed negative correlations between exposure to PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and bone mineral. Sex emerged as a potential factor affecting the negative effects of PFAS on bone mineral. The damage of PFAS to bone mineral still requires further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"3 4","pages":"363–372 363–372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/envhealth.4c00143","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposures and Bone Mineral: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Kai Tao,&nbsp;Bin Zeng,&nbsp;Linghui Deng,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Xianghong Zhou,&nbsp;Yuming Jin,&nbsp;Zilong Zhang,&nbsp;Weichao Huang,&nbsp;Xiaoli Zou,&nbsp;Yu Zhan,&nbsp;Ping Lu,&nbsp;Shi Qiu,&nbsp;Lu Yang* and Qiang Wei*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/envhealth.4c0014310.1021/envhealth.4c00143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their bioaccumulative nature. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. This pioneering study aims to assess the effects of different PFAS compounds on bone mineral. We conducted searches on online databases. Inclusion criteria included the presence of associations between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and BMD, BMD z-score, and bone mineral content (BMC). Meta-analyses were performed. Best evidence synthesis (BES) was performed to summarize the results. The results of BES showed that the evidence of PFOS, PFOA and PFNA with reduced bone mineral were moderate. The variability in methods for assessing bone mineral and sex differences are potential sources of heterogeneity in the results. Meta analysis showed that PFOA was associated with BMD (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analysis by sex showed that PFOS (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 50%), PFOA (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to +0.00; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 29%) were negatively correlated with BMD. This systematic review and BES revealed negative correlations between exposure to PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and bone mineral. Sex emerged as a potential factor affecting the negative effects of PFAS on bone mineral. The damage of PFAS to bone mineral still requires further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment & Health\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"363–372 363–372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/envhealth.4c00143\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.4c00143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.4c00143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是持久性环境污染物,以其生物蓄积性而闻名。骨密度(BMD)的降低与骨质疏松症的风险增加有关。这项开创性的研究旨在评估不同PFAS化合物对骨矿物质的影响。我们在网上数据库进行了搜索。纳入标准包括全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟己磺酸(PFHxS)、全氟壬酸(PFNA)和全氟癸酸(PFDA)与骨密度、骨密度z评分和骨矿物质含量(BMC)之间存在关联。进行meta分析。采用最佳证据综合(Best evidence synthesis, BES)对结果进行总结。BES结果显示,PFOS、PFOA和PFNA含量均为中度,骨矿物质含量降低。评估骨矿物质和性别差异的方法的可变性是结果异质性的潜在来源。Meta分析显示PFOA与骨密度相关(β−0.01,95% CI−0.01 ~−0.00;I2 = 0%)。按性别划分的亚组分析显示PFOS (β−0.01,95% CI−0.01 ~−0.00;I2 = 50%), PFOA (β−0.01,95% CI−0.01 ~ +0.00;I2 = 29%)与骨密度呈负相关。本系统综述和BES显示全氟辛烷磺酸、全氟辛酸、全氟辛酸与骨矿物质的暴露呈负相关。性别是影响PFAS对骨矿物质负面影响的潜在因素。PFAS对骨矿物质的损伤作用仍需进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposures and Bone Mineral: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their bioaccumulative nature. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. This pioneering study aims to assess the effects of different PFAS compounds on bone mineral. We conducted searches on online databases. Inclusion criteria included the presence of associations between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and BMD, BMD z-score, and bone mineral content (BMC). Meta-analyses were performed. Best evidence synthesis (BES) was performed to summarize the results. The results of BES showed that the evidence of PFOS, PFOA and PFNA with reduced bone mineral were moderate. The variability in methods for assessing bone mineral and sex differences are potential sources of heterogeneity in the results. Meta analysis showed that PFOA was associated with BMD (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis by sex showed that PFOS (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.00; I2 = 50%), PFOA (β −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to +0.00; I2 = 29%) were negatively correlated with BMD. This systematic review and BES revealed negative correlations between exposure to PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and bone mineral. Sex emerged as a potential factor affecting the negative effects of PFAS on bone mineral. The damage of PFAS to bone mineral still requires further exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment & Health
Environment & Health 环境科学、健康科学-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信