空间尺度和物种空间格局对丰度-适宜性关系的影响

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07766
David Ferrer-Ferrando, Pedro Tarroso, José Luis Tellería, Pelayo Acevedo, Javier Fernández-López
{"title":"空间尺度和物种空间格局对丰度-适宜性关系的影响","authors":"David Ferrer-Ferrando, Pedro Tarroso, José Luis Tellería, Pelayo Acevedo, Javier Fernández-López","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge about species abundance across broad spatial areas is crucial for unraveling ecological processes. Yet, abundance estimation often demands extensive sampling effort associated with logistical challenges. Using suitability values obtained from species distribution models (based on species' presence data) as a proxy for abundance has garnered interest during the last decades. Previous studies suggest a triangular relationship between species abundance and suitability. Specifically, higher suitability can display both low and high abundances, while low suitability only low abundances. This triangular pattern arises because suitability models often fail to consider limiting factors that drive abundance. In this study, we investigate the effect of spatial scale and pattern shaping this relationship. We use a simulation study and a case study to explore how these factors affect the abundance–suitability relationship. The effects of spatial scale are represented by three model levels: 1) only broad-scale covariates, 2) broad and intermediate covariates, and 3) broad, intermediate and local covariates. The effects of spatial patterns are characterized by two different species distribution shapes: aggregated and uniform. Our findings reveal that models integrating local-scale covariates and species exhibiting more aggregated spatial patterns show a stronger relationship. Additionally, we observe an interaction between a species' spatial pattern and model scale. For aggregated species, the abundance–suitability relationship benefits most notably from the addition of intermediate-scale covariates. In contrast, for uniform species, the benefit remains consistent regardless of whether intermediate- or local-scale covariates are added. Our results underscore the importance of considering both methodological and ecological factors to improve proxies for abundance derived from suitability models. We highlight the need for considering information operating at a local scale to make reliable inferences about species abundance from suitability models and suggest potential strategies for doing it.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the effect of the spatial scale and species spatial pattern on the abundance–suitability relationship\",\"authors\":\"David Ferrer-Ferrando, Pedro Tarroso, José Luis Tellería, Pelayo Acevedo, Javier Fernández-López\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge about species abundance across broad spatial areas is crucial for unraveling ecological processes. Yet, abundance estimation often demands extensive sampling effort associated with logistical challenges. Using suitability values obtained from species distribution models (based on species' presence data) as a proxy for abundance has garnered interest during the last decades. Previous studies suggest a triangular relationship between species abundance and suitability. Specifically, higher suitability can display both low and high abundances, while low suitability only low abundances. This triangular pattern arises because suitability models often fail to consider limiting factors that drive abundance. In this study, we investigate the effect of spatial scale and pattern shaping this relationship. We use a simulation study and a case study to explore how these factors affect the abundance–suitability relationship. The effects of spatial scale are represented by three model levels: 1) only broad-scale covariates, 2) broad and intermediate covariates, and 3) broad, intermediate and local covariates. The effects of spatial patterns are characterized by two different species distribution shapes: aggregated and uniform. Our findings reveal that models integrating local-scale covariates and species exhibiting more aggregated spatial patterns show a stronger relationship. Additionally, we observe an interaction between a species' spatial pattern and model scale. For aggregated species, the abundance–suitability relationship benefits most notably from the addition of intermediate-scale covariates. In contrast, for uniform species, the benefit remains consistent regardless of whether intermediate- or local-scale covariates are added. Our results underscore the importance of considering both methodological and ecological factors to improve proxies for abundance derived from suitability models. We highlight the need for considering information operating at a local scale to make reliable inferences about species abundance from suitability models and suggest potential strategies for doing it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07766\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解广阔空间范围内的物种丰度对于揭示生态过程至关重要。然而,丰度估算往往需要大量的采样工作,并面临后勤方面的挑战。在过去几十年中,使用从物种分布模型(基于物种存在数据)中获得的适宜度值作为丰度的替代值引起了人们的兴趣。以往的研究表明,物种丰度与适宜度之间存在三角关系。具体来说,适宜度越高,丰度越高,而适宜度越低,丰度越低。之所以会出现这种三角模式,是因为适宜性模型往往没有考虑到驱动物种丰度的限制因素。在本研究中,我们调查了空间尺度和模式对这种关系的影响。我们通过模拟研究和案例研究来探讨这些因素如何影响丰度-适宜度关系。空间尺度的影响由三个模型层次表示:1)仅宽尺度协变量;2)宽和中间协变量;3)宽、中间和局部协变量。空间模式的影响表现为两种不同的物种分布形状:聚集分布和均匀分布。我们的研究结果表明,整合了地方尺度协变量的模型与表现出更多聚集空间模式的物种之间的关系更密切。此外,我们还观察到物种空间模式与模型尺度之间的相互作用。对于聚集型物种,加入中间尺度协变量后,丰度与适宜性之间的关系最为明显。相比之下,对于均匀物种,无论加入中间尺度还是局部尺度的协变量,其受益都是一致的。我们的研究结果强调了同时考虑方法学和生态学因素对改进适宜性模型得出的丰度替代值的重要性。我们强调了考虑局部尺度信息的必要性,以便通过适宜性模型对物种丰度做出可靠的推断,并提出了潜在的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disentangling the effect of the spatial scale and species spatial pattern on the abundance–suitability relationship
Knowledge about species abundance across broad spatial areas is crucial for unraveling ecological processes. Yet, abundance estimation often demands extensive sampling effort associated with logistical challenges. Using suitability values obtained from species distribution models (based on species' presence data) as a proxy for abundance has garnered interest during the last decades. Previous studies suggest a triangular relationship between species abundance and suitability. Specifically, higher suitability can display both low and high abundances, while low suitability only low abundances. This triangular pattern arises because suitability models often fail to consider limiting factors that drive abundance. In this study, we investigate the effect of spatial scale and pattern shaping this relationship. We use a simulation study and a case study to explore how these factors affect the abundance–suitability relationship. The effects of spatial scale are represented by three model levels: 1) only broad-scale covariates, 2) broad and intermediate covariates, and 3) broad, intermediate and local covariates. The effects of spatial patterns are characterized by two different species distribution shapes: aggregated and uniform. Our findings reveal that models integrating local-scale covariates and species exhibiting more aggregated spatial patterns show a stronger relationship. Additionally, we observe an interaction between a species' spatial pattern and model scale. For aggregated species, the abundance–suitability relationship benefits most notably from the addition of intermediate-scale covariates. In contrast, for uniform species, the benefit remains consistent regardless of whether intermediate- or local-scale covariates are added. Our results underscore the importance of considering both methodological and ecological factors to improve proxies for abundance derived from suitability models. We highlight the need for considering information operating at a local scale to make reliable inferences about species abundance from suitability models and suggest potential strategies for doing it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信