David Ferrer-Ferrando, Pedro Tarroso, José Luis Tellería, Pelayo Acevedo, Javier Fernández-López
{"title":"空间尺度和物种空间格局对丰度-适宜性关系的影响","authors":"David Ferrer-Ferrando, Pedro Tarroso, José Luis Tellería, Pelayo Acevedo, Javier Fernández-López","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge about species abundance across broad spatial areas is crucial for unraveling ecological processes. Yet, abundance estimation often demands extensive sampling effort associated with logistical challenges. Using suitability values obtained from species distribution models (based on species' presence data) as a proxy for abundance has garnered interest during the last decades. Previous studies suggest a triangular relationship between species abundance and suitability. Specifically, higher suitability can display both low and high abundances, while low suitability only low abundances. This triangular pattern arises because suitability models often fail to consider limiting factors that drive abundance. In this study, we investigate the effect of spatial scale and pattern shaping this relationship. We use a simulation study and a case study to explore how these factors affect the abundance–suitability relationship. The effects of spatial scale are represented by three model levels: 1) only broad-scale covariates, 2) broad and intermediate covariates, and 3) broad, intermediate and local covariates. The effects of spatial patterns are characterized by two different species distribution shapes: aggregated and uniform. Our findings reveal that models integrating local-scale covariates and species exhibiting more aggregated spatial patterns show a stronger relationship. Additionally, we observe an interaction between a species' spatial pattern and model scale. For aggregated species, the abundance–suitability relationship benefits most notably from the addition of intermediate-scale covariates. In contrast, for uniform species, the benefit remains consistent regardless of whether intermediate- or local-scale covariates are added. Our results underscore the importance of considering both methodological and ecological factors to improve proxies for abundance derived from suitability models. We highlight the need for considering information operating at a local scale to make reliable inferences about species abundance from suitability models and suggest potential strategies for doing it.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the effect of the spatial scale and species spatial pattern on the abundance–suitability relationship\",\"authors\":\"David Ferrer-Ferrando, Pedro Tarroso, José Luis Tellería, Pelayo Acevedo, Javier Fernández-López\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge about species abundance across broad spatial areas is crucial for unraveling ecological processes. Yet, abundance estimation often demands extensive sampling effort associated with logistical challenges. Using suitability values obtained from species distribution models (based on species' presence data) as a proxy for abundance has garnered interest during the last decades. Previous studies suggest a triangular relationship between species abundance and suitability. Specifically, higher suitability can display both low and high abundances, while low suitability only low abundances. This triangular pattern arises because suitability models often fail to consider limiting factors that drive abundance. In this study, we investigate the effect of spatial scale and pattern shaping this relationship. We use a simulation study and a case study to explore how these factors affect the abundance–suitability relationship. The effects of spatial scale are represented by three model levels: 1) only broad-scale covariates, 2) broad and intermediate covariates, and 3) broad, intermediate and local covariates. The effects of spatial patterns are characterized by two different species distribution shapes: aggregated and uniform. Our findings reveal that models integrating local-scale covariates and species exhibiting more aggregated spatial patterns show a stronger relationship. Additionally, we observe an interaction between a species' spatial pattern and model scale. For aggregated species, the abundance–suitability relationship benefits most notably from the addition of intermediate-scale covariates. In contrast, for uniform species, the benefit remains consistent regardless of whether intermediate- or local-scale covariates are added. Our results underscore the importance of considering both methodological and ecological factors to improve proxies for abundance derived from suitability models. We highlight the need for considering information operating at a local scale to make reliable inferences about species abundance from suitability models and suggest potential strategies for doing it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07766\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disentangling the effect of the spatial scale and species spatial pattern on the abundance–suitability relationship
Knowledge about species abundance across broad spatial areas is crucial for unraveling ecological processes. Yet, abundance estimation often demands extensive sampling effort associated with logistical challenges. Using suitability values obtained from species distribution models (based on species' presence data) as a proxy for abundance has garnered interest during the last decades. Previous studies suggest a triangular relationship between species abundance and suitability. Specifically, higher suitability can display both low and high abundances, while low suitability only low abundances. This triangular pattern arises because suitability models often fail to consider limiting factors that drive abundance. In this study, we investigate the effect of spatial scale and pattern shaping this relationship. We use a simulation study and a case study to explore how these factors affect the abundance–suitability relationship. The effects of spatial scale are represented by three model levels: 1) only broad-scale covariates, 2) broad and intermediate covariates, and 3) broad, intermediate and local covariates. The effects of spatial patterns are characterized by two different species distribution shapes: aggregated and uniform. Our findings reveal that models integrating local-scale covariates and species exhibiting more aggregated spatial patterns show a stronger relationship. Additionally, we observe an interaction between a species' spatial pattern and model scale. For aggregated species, the abundance–suitability relationship benefits most notably from the addition of intermediate-scale covariates. In contrast, for uniform species, the benefit remains consistent regardless of whether intermediate- or local-scale covariates are added. Our results underscore the importance of considering both methodological and ecological factors to improve proxies for abundance derived from suitability models. We highlight the need for considering information operating at a local scale to make reliable inferences about species abundance from suitability models and suggest potential strategies for doing it.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.