海洋渔业管理中的行为经济学:系统综述

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Amanda Schadeberg, Alina Madita Wieczorek, Dorothy J. Dankel, Katell G. Hamon, Marloes Kraan, Mary Mackay, Debbi Pedreschi, Ingrid van Putten, Andries Richter, Noa Steiner, Nathalie A. Steins, Xanthe Verschuur
{"title":"海洋渔业管理中的行为经济学:系统综述","authors":"Amanda Schadeberg, Alina Madita Wieczorek, Dorothy J. Dankel, Katell G. Hamon, Marloes Kraan, Mary Mackay, Debbi Pedreschi, Ingrid van Putten, Andries Richter, Noa Steiner, Nathalie A. Steins, Xanthe Verschuur","doi":"10.1111/faf.12901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Targeted management interventions can influence marine resource user behaviour, yet some remain ineffective. Behavioural economics may offer valuable insights on this topic by identifying which interventions can effectively change human behaviour and how they can be applied. This systematic review (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 140) synthesises evidence from behavioural economics studies conducted in a fisheries context. The results include a table of behavioural mechanisms and examples of evidence for behavioural interventions changing environmental, economic, and social outcomes. There is a growing body of evidence that interventions that activate mechanisms such as social norms or risk aversion can impact environmental outcomes. However, there is a general lack of explicit reporting of the link between behavioural mechanisms, interventions, and outcomes, revealing weak conceptualisation in the field. This hinders the ability of scientists, practitioners, and policymakers to derive actionable insights from the research. Furthermore, the ethics of intervening in human behaviour as well as thorough analysis of unintended consequences need significant attention. To resolve these issues and guide the field forward, this systematic review offers recommendations for both science and policy as well as a conceptual framework that can improve the design of future studies that aim to understand human behaviour in a fisheries setting.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioural Economics in Marine Fisheries Management: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Schadeberg, Alina Madita Wieczorek, Dorothy J. Dankel, Katell G. Hamon, Marloes Kraan, Mary Mackay, Debbi Pedreschi, Ingrid van Putten, Andries Richter, Noa Steiner, Nathalie A. Steins, Xanthe Verschuur\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Targeted management interventions can influence marine resource user behaviour, yet some remain ineffective. Behavioural economics may offer valuable insights on this topic by identifying which interventions can effectively change human behaviour and how they can be applied. This systematic review (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 140) synthesises evidence from behavioural economics studies conducted in a fisheries context. The results include a table of behavioural mechanisms and examples of evidence for behavioural interventions changing environmental, economic, and social outcomes. There is a growing body of evidence that interventions that activate mechanisms such as social norms or risk aversion can impact environmental outcomes. However, there is a general lack of explicit reporting of the link between behavioural mechanisms, interventions, and outcomes, revealing weak conceptualisation in the field. This hinders the ability of scientists, practitioners, and policymakers to derive actionable insights from the research. Furthermore, the ethics of intervening in human behaviour as well as thorough analysis of unintended consequences need significant attention. To resolve these issues and guide the field forward, this systematic review offers recommendations for both science and policy as well as a conceptual framework that can improve the design of future studies that aim to understand human behaviour in a fisheries setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12901\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12901","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有针对性的管理干预措施可以影响海洋资源使用者的行为,但有些仍然无效。行为经济学可以通过确定哪些干预措施可以有效地改变人类行为以及如何应用这些干预措施,为这一主题提供有价值的见解。本系统综述(N = 140)综合了在渔业背景下进行的行为经济学研究的证据。结果包括行为机制表和行为干预改变环境、经济和社会结果的证据示例。越来越多的证据表明,激活社会规范或风险规避等机制的干预措施可以影响环境结果。然而,行为机制、干预措施和结果之间的联系普遍缺乏明确的报告,这表明该领域的概念化程度较弱。这阻碍了科学家、从业者和政策制定者从研究中获得可操作的见解的能力。此外,干预人类行为的伦理问题以及对意外后果的彻底分析需要引起高度重视。为了解决这些问题并指导该领域向前发展,本系统综述为科学和政策提供了建议,并提供了一个概念框架,可以改进旨在了解渔业环境中人类行为的未来研究的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavioural Economics in Marine Fisheries Management: A Systematic Review
Targeted management interventions can influence marine resource user behaviour, yet some remain ineffective. Behavioural economics may offer valuable insights on this topic by identifying which interventions can effectively change human behaviour and how they can be applied. This systematic review (N = 140) synthesises evidence from behavioural economics studies conducted in a fisheries context. The results include a table of behavioural mechanisms and examples of evidence for behavioural interventions changing environmental, economic, and social outcomes. There is a growing body of evidence that interventions that activate mechanisms such as social norms or risk aversion can impact environmental outcomes. However, there is a general lack of explicit reporting of the link between behavioural mechanisms, interventions, and outcomes, revealing weak conceptualisation in the field. This hinders the ability of scientists, practitioners, and policymakers to derive actionable insights from the research. Furthermore, the ethics of intervening in human behaviour as well as thorough analysis of unintended consequences need significant attention. To resolve these issues and guide the field forward, this systematic review offers recommendations for both science and policy as well as a conceptual framework that can improve the design of future studies that aim to understand human behaviour in a fisheries setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信