Laurence Torcel-Pagnon, Laurent Coudeville, Rebecca C Harris, Sandra S Chaves
{"title":"流感对美国工作年龄成年人的影响:探索重组流感疫苗的益处","authors":"Laurence Torcel-Pagnon, Laurent Coudeville, Rebecca C Harris, Sandra S Chaves","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite universal influenza vaccine recommendation in the US, vaccination coverage rates (VCR) in working-age adults (18–64 years) remain suboptimal. Studies have suggested that recombinant influenza vaccines (RIV) offer better protection than standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (SD-IIV) in those ages. We explored the potential added benefit of recommending RIV for the US working-age population. Methods We gathered data on influenza burden, vaccine effectiveness, and VCR from the US-CDC (2012–2023, excluding 2020–2021). We conducted a retrospective analysis of the past 10 years to illustrate the influenza burden among adults 18–64 years. We performed an age-stratified analysis using prevalence of chronic conditions to assess their impact on influenza hospitalizations and deaths, and estimated reductions in hospitalizations if RIV had been used instead of SD-IIV during the study period, using an age and risk-group decision-tree model. Results Over the last decade, influenza caused a median of 151,021 hospitalizations (95% CI 139,750–164,130) per season among US working-age adults. Adults aged 50–64 years had 3- to 5-fold higher rates of hospitalization and death than those aged 18–49 years. The 14% of 18–49-year-olds with chronic conditions accounted for more than 28% of hospitalizations and deaths in this group. If RIV had been used instead of SD-IIV, an additional 10,000 hospitalizations could have been prevented each season in these populations. Conclusions Influenza significantly impacts US working-age adults, particularly 50-64-year-olds. Increases in longevity and chronic conditions prevalence are expected, making tailored public health vaccine recommendations important to support healthy aging.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Influenza on US Working-Age Adults: Exploring the Benefits of the Recombinant Influenza Vaccine\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Torcel-Pagnon, Laurent Coudeville, Rebecca C Harris, Sandra S Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciaf200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Despite universal influenza vaccine recommendation in the US, vaccination coverage rates (VCR) in working-age adults (18–64 years) remain suboptimal. Studies have suggested that recombinant influenza vaccines (RIV) offer better protection than standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (SD-IIV) in those ages. We explored the potential added benefit of recommending RIV for the US working-age population. Methods We gathered data on influenza burden, vaccine effectiveness, and VCR from the US-CDC (2012–2023, excluding 2020–2021). We conducted a retrospective analysis of the past 10 years to illustrate the influenza burden among adults 18–64 years. We performed an age-stratified analysis using prevalence of chronic conditions to assess their impact on influenza hospitalizations and deaths, and estimated reductions in hospitalizations if RIV had been used instead of SD-IIV during the study period, using an age and risk-group decision-tree model. Results Over the last decade, influenza caused a median of 151,021 hospitalizations (95% CI 139,750–164,130) per season among US working-age adults. Adults aged 50–64 years had 3- to 5-fold higher rates of hospitalization and death than those aged 18–49 years. The 14% of 18–49-year-olds with chronic conditions accounted for more than 28% of hospitalizations and deaths in this group. If RIV had been used instead of SD-IIV, an additional 10,000 hospitalizations could have been prevented each season in these populations. Conclusions Influenza significantly impacts US working-age adults, particularly 50-64-year-olds. Increases in longevity and chronic conditions prevalence are expected, making tailored public health vaccine recommendations important to support healthy aging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf200\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Influenza on US Working-Age Adults: Exploring the Benefits of the Recombinant Influenza Vaccine
Background Despite universal influenza vaccine recommendation in the US, vaccination coverage rates (VCR) in working-age adults (18–64 years) remain suboptimal. Studies have suggested that recombinant influenza vaccines (RIV) offer better protection than standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (SD-IIV) in those ages. We explored the potential added benefit of recommending RIV for the US working-age population. Methods We gathered data on influenza burden, vaccine effectiveness, and VCR from the US-CDC (2012–2023, excluding 2020–2021). We conducted a retrospective analysis of the past 10 years to illustrate the influenza burden among adults 18–64 years. We performed an age-stratified analysis using prevalence of chronic conditions to assess their impact on influenza hospitalizations and deaths, and estimated reductions in hospitalizations if RIV had been used instead of SD-IIV during the study period, using an age and risk-group decision-tree model. Results Over the last decade, influenza caused a median of 151,021 hospitalizations (95% CI 139,750–164,130) per season among US working-age adults. Adults aged 50–64 years had 3- to 5-fold higher rates of hospitalization and death than those aged 18–49 years. The 14% of 18–49-year-olds with chronic conditions accounted for more than 28% of hospitalizations and deaths in this group. If RIV had been used instead of SD-IIV, an additional 10,000 hospitalizations could have been prevented each season in these populations. Conclusions Influenza significantly impacts US working-age adults, particularly 50-64-year-olds. Increases in longevity and chronic conditions prevalence are expected, making tailored public health vaccine recommendations important to support healthy aging.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.