加拿大风湿病协会制定和认可质量措施以支持学习卫生系统的指南。

Racheal Githumbi,Claire E H Barber,Susan J Bartlett,Karine Toupin-April,Marinka Twilt,Diane Lacaille,Cheryl Barnabe,Kiran Dhiman,Alison M Hoens,Adrian Grebowicz,Tara McMillan,Jessica Widdifield
{"title":"加拿大风湿病协会制定和认可质量措施以支持学习卫生系统的指南。","authors":"Racheal Githumbi,Claire E H Barber,Susan J Bartlett,Karine Toupin-April,Marinka Twilt,Diane Lacaille,Cheryl Barnabe,Kiran Dhiman,Alison M Hoens,Adrian Grebowicz,Tara McMillan,Jessica Widdifield","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo review methods for developing and endorsing Quality Measures (QMs) to inform a national quality measurement framework for rheumatology care in Canada.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a rapid environmental scan of measure development organizations from Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. Major phases in the development of QMs were abstracted. The results were reviewed and synthesized with members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association's Digital Measurement Subcommittee through iterative review across 3 virtual meetings. The guidance was approved at the committee and the CRA board level.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFive key steps in the measure development cycle are proposed including: conceptualization and prioritization, measure specification development, testing and validation, implementation and reporting, continuous evaluation and maintenance. Foundational to all phases is the engagement of individuals from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of disease, healthcare providers, quality measurement scientists, and partner organizations. Measures should be aligned with domains of quality (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness of care delivery) and be developed transparently. Endorsement of future QMs should, at minimum, prioritize validity, feasibility and acceptability or use/usability.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis paper establishes a comprehensive and relevant framework for the development and/or endorsement of QMs in Canadian rheumatology care. This framework will permit streamlining of future quality improvement efforts at the national level.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian Rheumatology Association Guidance for Developing & Endorsing Quality Measures to Support Learning Health Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Racheal Githumbi,Claire E H Barber,Susan J Bartlett,Karine Toupin-April,Marinka Twilt,Diane Lacaille,Cheryl Barnabe,Kiran Dhiman,Alison M Hoens,Adrian Grebowicz,Tara McMillan,Jessica Widdifield\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo review methods for developing and endorsing Quality Measures (QMs) to inform a national quality measurement framework for rheumatology care in Canada.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a rapid environmental scan of measure development organizations from Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. Major phases in the development of QMs were abstracted. The results were reviewed and synthesized with members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association's Digital Measurement Subcommittee through iterative review across 3 virtual meetings. The guidance was approved at the committee and the CRA board level.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nFive key steps in the measure development cycle are proposed including: conceptualization and prioritization, measure specification development, testing and validation, implementation and reporting, continuous evaluation and maintenance. Foundational to all phases is the engagement of individuals from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of disease, healthcare providers, quality measurement scientists, and partner organizations. Measures should be aligned with domains of quality (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness of care delivery) and be developed transparently. Endorsement of future QMs should, at minimum, prioritize validity, feasibility and acceptability or use/usability.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis paper establishes a comprehensive and relevant framework for the development and/or endorsement of QMs in Canadian rheumatology care. This framework will permit streamlining of future quality improvement efforts at the national level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的回顾制定和批准质量措施(QMs)的方法,为加拿大风湿病护理的国家质量测量框架提供信息。方法我们对来自加拿大、英国、美国和澳大利亚的措施开发组织进行了快速的环境扫描。对质量管理体系发展的主要阶段进行了抽象。通过3次虚拟会议的反复审查,加拿大风湿病协会数字测量小组委员会的成员对结果进行了审查和综合。该指南已在委员会和CRA董事会层面获得批准。结果提出了度量开发周期的五个关键步骤,包括:概念化和优先级排序、度量规范开发、测试和验证、实施和报告、持续评估和维护。所有阶段的基础是来自不同背景、具有疾病生活经验的个人、医疗保健提供者、质量测量科学家和合作伙伴组织的参与。措施应与质量领域(有效性、效率、公平、以患者为中心、安全和及时提供护理)保持一致,并应透明地制定。未来质量管理体系的认可至少应该优先考虑有效性、可行性和可接受性或使用/可用性。结论:本文为加拿大风湿病护理QMs的开发和/或认可建立了一个全面和相关的框架。这一框架将允许在国家一级精简今后的质量改进工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canadian Rheumatology Association Guidance for Developing & Endorsing Quality Measures to Support Learning Health Systems.
OBJECTIVE To review methods for developing and endorsing Quality Measures (QMs) to inform a national quality measurement framework for rheumatology care in Canada. METHODS We conducted a rapid environmental scan of measure development organizations from Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. Major phases in the development of QMs were abstracted. The results were reviewed and synthesized with members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association's Digital Measurement Subcommittee through iterative review across 3 virtual meetings. The guidance was approved at the committee and the CRA board level. RESULTS Five key steps in the measure development cycle are proposed including: conceptualization and prioritization, measure specification development, testing and validation, implementation and reporting, continuous evaluation and maintenance. Foundational to all phases is the engagement of individuals from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of disease, healthcare providers, quality measurement scientists, and partner organizations. Measures should be aligned with domains of quality (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness of care delivery) and be developed transparently. Endorsement of future QMs should, at minimum, prioritize validity, feasibility and acceptability or use/usability. CONCLUSION This paper establishes a comprehensive and relevant framework for the development and/or endorsement of QMs in Canadian rheumatology care. This framework will permit streamlining of future quality improvement efforts at the national level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信