美国医疗保险登记老年人急诊出院后基于电话的认知评估和医疗保健利用的可行性

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Walter D. Dawson, Natasha Spoden, Sarah Gothard, Nora Mattek, Jeffrey Kaye, Kirsten Wright
{"title":"美国医疗保险登记老年人急诊出院后基于电话的认知评估和医疗保健利用的可行性","authors":"Walter D. Dawson,&nbsp;Natasha Spoden,&nbsp;Sarah Gothard,&nbsp;Nora Mattek,&nbsp;Jeffrey Kaye,&nbsp;Kirsten Wright","doi":"10.1002/gps.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Wider screening and assessment for Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias (ADRD) may increase access to supportive care, improve allocation of medical care, and foster the use of interventions that prevent or delay disease progression. Yet, the effect of diagnostic timing on clinical and utilization outcomes is poorly understood. Community-based settings such as a hospital emergency department (ED) may be an underrecognized opportunity to assess cognition and impacts on individuals and health systems. This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting older adults for telephone-based trials following presentation to the ED and administering telephone based cognitive assessments over the phone in this population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Medicare-enrolled individuals 65+ years of age (<i>n</i> = 160) presenting to the Oregon Health &amp; Science University Emergency Department (Portland, Oregon) between May 2022 and February 2023 were recruited by telephone. Participants were administered the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) Assessment and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Measure Questions on Mental Clarity via telephone 1–12 weeks post-discharge to evaluate cognition. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for medical care utilization including primary care provider (PCP) visits, hospital admissions, and ED visits for the 3 years prior to ED presentation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-six percent of eligible ED users contacted elected for study enrollment. The TICS Assessment score had a significant relationship with the three evaluated health care utilization measures (ED, PCP visits, or hospitalizations); the PROMIS Assessment had significant but weak correlations to ED and PCP visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Older adults 65+ years presenting to the ED are amenable to enroll in telephone-based cognition-focused trials and cognitive assessments can be carried out over the telephone in this population. The PROMIS Assessment may be a better cognition assessment tool when evaluating for cognition and care utilization in this population. In addition to the limits of the screening tools used in this study, a lack of a representative sample is a limitation of the study design. Future studies could use other validated cognitive assessment tools and utilize a study design with a recruitment strategy focused on obtaining a representative sample of older ED patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Telephone-Based Cognitive Assessments and Healthcare Utilization in US Medicare-Enrolled Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge\",\"authors\":\"Walter D. Dawson,&nbsp;Natasha Spoden,&nbsp;Sarah Gothard,&nbsp;Nora Mattek,&nbsp;Jeffrey Kaye,&nbsp;Kirsten Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gps.70078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Wider screening and assessment for Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias (ADRD) may increase access to supportive care, improve allocation of medical care, and foster the use of interventions that prevent or delay disease progression. Yet, the effect of diagnostic timing on clinical and utilization outcomes is poorly understood. Community-based settings such as a hospital emergency department (ED) may be an underrecognized opportunity to assess cognition and impacts on individuals and health systems. This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting older adults for telephone-based trials following presentation to the ED and administering telephone based cognitive assessments over the phone in this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medicare-enrolled individuals 65+ years of age (<i>n</i> = 160) presenting to the Oregon Health &amp; Science University Emergency Department (Portland, Oregon) between May 2022 and February 2023 were recruited by telephone. Participants were administered the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) Assessment and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Measure Questions on Mental Clarity via telephone 1–12 weeks post-discharge to evaluate cognition. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for medical care utilization including primary care provider (PCP) visits, hospital admissions, and ED visits for the 3 years prior to ED presentation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-six percent of eligible ED users contacted elected for study enrollment. The TICS Assessment score had a significant relationship with the three evaluated health care utilization measures (ED, PCP visits, or hospitalizations); the PROMIS Assessment had significant but weak correlations to ED and PCP visits.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Older adults 65+ years presenting to the ED are amenable to enroll in telephone-based cognition-focused trials and cognitive assessments can be carried out over the telephone in this population. The PROMIS Assessment may be a better cognition assessment tool when evaluating for cognition and care utilization in this population. In addition to the limits of the screening tools used in this study, a lack of a representative sample is a limitation of the study design. Future studies could use other validated cognitive assessment tools and utilize a study design with a recruitment strategy focused on obtaining a representative sample of older ED patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70078\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对阿尔茨海默病和其他相关痴呆(ADRD)进行更广泛的筛查和评估可能会增加获得支持性护理的机会,改善医疗保健的分配,并促进使用预防或延迟疾病进展的干预措施。然而,诊断时间对临床和使用结果的影响尚不清楚。以社区为基础的环境,如医院急诊科(ED),可能是评估认知和对个人和卫生系统影响的一个未被充分认识的机会。本研究评估了招募老年人进行基于电话的试验的可行性,该试验是在向急诊科介绍后进行的,并通过电话对该人群进行基于电话的认知评估。方法:65岁以上参加医疗保险的个人(n = 160)到俄勒冈健康&;科学大学急诊科(波特兰,俄勒冈州)于2022年5月至2023年2月期间通过电话招募。出院后1-12周,通过电话对参与者进行认知状态(TICS)评估电话访谈和患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)心理清晰度认知测量问题评估认知。我们回顾了电子病历(EMR)的医疗保健利用情况,包括初级保健提供者(PCP)就诊、住院和ED就诊3年。结果:26%的符合条件的ED使用者被选中参加研究。tic评估得分与三项被评估的医疗保健利用措施(ED、PCP就诊或住院)有显著相关;PROMIS评估与ED和PCP就诊有显著但弱的相关性。结论:65岁以上到急诊科就诊的老年人可以参加以电话为基础的以认知为重点的试验,并且可以在该人群中通过电话进行认知评估。PROMIS评估可能是一个较好的认知评估工具,用于评估该人群的认知和护理利用。除了本研究中使用的筛选工具的局限性外,缺乏代表性样本也是研究设计的局限性。未来的研究可以使用其他有效的认知评估工具,并利用研究设计的招募策略,重点是获得老年ED患者的代表性样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Telephone-Based Cognitive Assessments and Healthcare Utilization in US Medicare-Enrolled Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge

Background

Wider screening and assessment for Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias (ADRD) may increase access to supportive care, improve allocation of medical care, and foster the use of interventions that prevent or delay disease progression. Yet, the effect of diagnostic timing on clinical and utilization outcomes is poorly understood. Community-based settings such as a hospital emergency department (ED) may be an underrecognized opportunity to assess cognition and impacts on individuals and health systems. This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting older adults for telephone-based trials following presentation to the ED and administering telephone based cognitive assessments over the phone in this population.

Methods

Medicare-enrolled individuals 65+ years of age (n = 160) presenting to the Oregon Health & Science University Emergency Department (Portland, Oregon) between May 2022 and February 2023 were recruited by telephone. Participants were administered the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) Assessment and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Measure Questions on Mental Clarity via telephone 1–12 weeks post-discharge to evaluate cognition. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for medical care utilization including primary care provider (PCP) visits, hospital admissions, and ED visits for the 3 years prior to ED presentation.

Results

Twenty-six percent of eligible ED users contacted elected for study enrollment. The TICS Assessment score had a significant relationship with the three evaluated health care utilization measures (ED, PCP visits, or hospitalizations); the PROMIS Assessment had significant but weak correlations to ED and PCP visits.

Conclusions

Older adults 65+ years presenting to the ED are amenable to enroll in telephone-based cognition-focused trials and cognitive assessments can be carried out over the telephone in this population. The PROMIS Assessment may be a better cognition assessment tool when evaluating for cognition and care utilization in this population. In addition to the limits of the screening tools used in this study, a lack of a representative sample is a limitation of the study design. Future studies could use other validated cognitive assessment tools and utilize a study design with a recruitment strategy focused on obtaining a representative sample of older ED patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信