生态干扰与群落聚集背景下的局部稳定密度效应

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1111/ele.70118
Cole J. Doolittle, Joseph A. LaManna
{"title":"生态干扰与群落聚集背景下的局部稳定密度效应","authors":"Cole J. Doolittle,&nbsp;Joseph A. LaManna","doi":"10.1111/ele.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The maintenance of species diversity in ecological communities has many promising explanations, including certain types of local biotic interactions that generate differential effects on the performance of conspecific and heterospecific individuals. To date, most studies of these local biotic interactions have focused on relatively stable systems, such as mature forests or undisturbed grasslands. However, many ecosystems are far from a stable state, especially under accelerating global climate change. Here, we present a synthesis of local differences between conspecific and heterospecific interactions following disturbances—and how disturbances may alter the strength and scaling of these effects to population growth and species diversity. First, we clarify terminology and categorise disturbances based on their primary mode of impact on species interactions. Second, we leverage existing literature to develop a framework for understanding how disturbances may alter the strength and role of local biotic interactions in regenerating communities. Third, we use prominent examples of disturbance: drought, windthrow and wildfire, to highlight remaining gaps in knowledge. Finally, we discuss implications for future populations and communities in unstable states. We emphasise the need for empirical studies to further integrate disturbance and local conspecific density effects within broader ecological models of community assembly and functioning.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Stabilising Density Effects in the Context of Ecological Disturbance and Community Assembly\",\"authors\":\"Cole J. Doolittle,&nbsp;Joseph A. LaManna\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The maintenance of species diversity in ecological communities has many promising explanations, including certain types of local biotic interactions that generate differential effects on the performance of conspecific and heterospecific individuals. To date, most studies of these local biotic interactions have focused on relatively stable systems, such as mature forests or undisturbed grasslands. However, many ecosystems are far from a stable state, especially under accelerating global climate change. Here, we present a synthesis of local differences between conspecific and heterospecific interactions following disturbances—and how disturbances may alter the strength and scaling of these effects to population growth and species diversity. First, we clarify terminology and categorise disturbances based on their primary mode of impact on species interactions. Second, we leverage existing literature to develop a framework for understanding how disturbances may alter the strength and role of local biotic interactions in regenerating communities. Third, we use prominent examples of disturbance: drought, windthrow and wildfire, to highlight remaining gaps in knowledge. Finally, we discuss implications for future populations and communities in unstable states. We emphasise the need for empirical studies to further integrate disturbance and local conspecific density effects within broader ecological models of community assembly and functioning.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70118\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70118\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态群落中物种多样性的维持有许多有希望的解释,包括某些类型的局部生物相互作用对同种和异种个体的表现产生差异影响。迄今为止,大多数关于这些局部生物相互作用的研究都集中在相对稳定的系统上,如成熟的森林或未受干扰的草原。然而,许多生态系统远未达到稳定状态,特别是在全球气候变化加速的情况下。在这里,我们综合了干扰后同种和异种相互作用之间的局部差异,以及干扰如何改变这些影响对种群生长和物种多样性的强度和规模。首先,我们澄清了术语,并根据干扰对物种相互作用的主要影响模式对干扰进行了分类。其次,我们利用现有文献来开发一个框架,以理解干扰如何改变再生群落中本地生物相互作用的强度和作用。第三,我们使用了干扰的突出例子:干旱、大风和野火,以突出知识上仍然存在的差距。最后,我们讨论了不稳定国家对未来人口和社区的影响。我们强调需要进行实证研究,进一步将干扰和局部同密度效应整合到更广泛的群落组装和功能生态模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Local Stabilising Density Effects in the Context of Ecological Disturbance and Community Assembly

Local Stabilising Density Effects in the Context of Ecological Disturbance and Community Assembly

The maintenance of species diversity in ecological communities has many promising explanations, including certain types of local biotic interactions that generate differential effects on the performance of conspecific and heterospecific individuals. To date, most studies of these local biotic interactions have focused on relatively stable systems, such as mature forests or undisturbed grasslands. However, many ecosystems are far from a stable state, especially under accelerating global climate change. Here, we present a synthesis of local differences between conspecific and heterospecific interactions following disturbances—and how disturbances may alter the strength and scaling of these effects to population growth and species diversity. First, we clarify terminology and categorise disturbances based on their primary mode of impact on species interactions. Second, we leverage existing literature to develop a framework for understanding how disturbances may alter the strength and role of local biotic interactions in regenerating communities. Third, we use prominent examples of disturbance: drought, windthrow and wildfire, to highlight remaining gaps in knowledge. Finally, we discuss implications for future populations and communities in unstable states. We emphasise the need for empirical studies to further integrate disturbance and local conspecific density effects within broader ecological models of community assembly and functioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信