Mo Yang;Weirong Nie;He Wang;Baolin Cheng;Zhuoxiang Ning;Shenghong Lei;Yun Cao;Zhanwen Xi;Jiong Wang
{"title":"一种新型硅基MEMS挫折安全装置失效行为分析","authors":"Mo Yang;Weirong Nie;He Wang;Baolin Cheng;Zhuoxiang Ning;Shenghong Lei;Yun Cao;Zhanwen Xi;Jiong Wang","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3540452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve the reliability and safety of the safety and arming device (S&A), this article presents a failure analysis of a novel silicon-based MEMS setback safety device with curved zig-zag tracks. The results of the finite element method (FEM) confirm that the setback safety device is effective in detecting and distinguishing impact loads. The strength analysis using FEM simulation identified damage-prone locations. It was determined that the microspring is more prone to damage than the tooth of the zig-zag track. The failure behavior of the setback safety device has been investigated by impact experiment, and 88 times impact on 57 devices in different directions and magnitude produced 198 times failure behaviors. The experiments analyze the causes of failure behavior and suggest ways to improve. The study shows that it has two types of failure: function (31.82%) and nonfunction failures (68.18%). The most main function failures are spring damage and mislocking, which account for 87.30% of the function failures. The experiment validated the damage prioritization of FEM analysis, indicating that the FEM can be used as a preliminary criterion for predicting function failures. It was illustrated that machining errors in tooth height and width of the spring constituted a significant factor in the device’s failure, resulting in mislocking and spring damage. While nonfunction failures do not affect the basic function of the device and are acceptable without cumulative damage. Finally, a fault tree analysis was performed to summarize the failure behaviors of the setback safety device, and the methods for subsequent improvements are proposed.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 8","pages":"12711-12721"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure Behavior Analysis of a Novel Silicon-Based MEMS Setback Safety Device\",\"authors\":\"Mo Yang;Weirong Nie;He Wang;Baolin Cheng;Zhuoxiang Ning;Shenghong Lei;Yun Cao;Zhanwen Xi;Jiong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3540452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve the reliability and safety of the safety and arming device (S&A), this article presents a failure analysis of a novel silicon-based MEMS setback safety device with curved zig-zag tracks. The results of the finite element method (FEM) confirm that the setback safety device is effective in detecting and distinguishing impact loads. The strength analysis using FEM simulation identified damage-prone locations. It was determined that the microspring is more prone to damage than the tooth of the zig-zag track. The failure behavior of the setback safety device has been investigated by impact experiment, and 88 times impact on 57 devices in different directions and magnitude produced 198 times failure behaviors. The experiments analyze the causes of failure behavior and suggest ways to improve. The study shows that it has two types of failure: function (31.82%) and nonfunction failures (68.18%). The most main function failures are spring damage and mislocking, which account for 87.30% of the function failures. The experiment validated the damage prioritization of FEM analysis, indicating that the FEM can be used as a preliminary criterion for predicting function failures. It was illustrated that machining errors in tooth height and width of the spring constituted a significant factor in the device’s failure, resulting in mislocking and spring damage. While nonfunction failures do not affect the basic function of the device and are acceptable without cumulative damage. Finally, a fault tree analysis was performed to summarize the failure behaviors of the setback safety device, and the methods for subsequent improvements are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"12711-12721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10908535/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10908535/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Failure Behavior Analysis of a Novel Silicon-Based MEMS Setback Safety Device
To improve the reliability and safety of the safety and arming device (S&A), this article presents a failure analysis of a novel silicon-based MEMS setback safety device with curved zig-zag tracks. The results of the finite element method (FEM) confirm that the setback safety device is effective in detecting and distinguishing impact loads. The strength analysis using FEM simulation identified damage-prone locations. It was determined that the microspring is more prone to damage than the tooth of the zig-zag track. The failure behavior of the setback safety device has been investigated by impact experiment, and 88 times impact on 57 devices in different directions and magnitude produced 198 times failure behaviors. The experiments analyze the causes of failure behavior and suggest ways to improve. The study shows that it has two types of failure: function (31.82%) and nonfunction failures (68.18%). The most main function failures are spring damage and mislocking, which account for 87.30% of the function failures. The experiment validated the damage prioritization of FEM analysis, indicating that the FEM can be used as a preliminary criterion for predicting function failures. It was illustrated that machining errors in tooth height and width of the spring constituted a significant factor in the device’s failure, resulting in mislocking and spring damage. While nonfunction failures do not affect the basic function of the device and are acceptable without cumulative damage. Finally, a fault tree analysis was performed to summarize the failure behaviors of the setback safety device, and the methods for subsequent improvements are proposed.
期刊介绍:
The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following:
-Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation
-Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication
-Chemical and Gas Sensors
-Microfluidics and Biosensors
-Optical Sensors
-Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others
-Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors
-Sensor Packaging
-Sensor Networks
-Sensor Applications
-Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces
-Actuators and Sensor Power Systems
-Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting
-Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data)
-Sensors in Industrial Practice