评估HDPE土工膜中存在全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的假设

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Xinyan Xiang, Abdelmalek Bouazza, Elissar Mikhael
{"title":"评估HDPE土工膜中存在全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的假设","authors":"Xinyan Xiang,&nbsp;Abdelmalek Bouazza,&nbsp;Elissar Mikhael","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembranes, which are commonly utilised in waste containment facilities, hydraulic infrastructure and other engineering applications. Three different HDPE geomembranes (GMBs) were analysed for PFAS content using targeted detection of six specific analytes and total fluorine (TF) measurements. To assess PFAS leachability under different conditions, extraction experiments were conducted using solutions with varying methanol concentrations. The results showed that perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA), an ultra-short-chain PFAS, was detected in all tested geomembranes at concentrations ranging from below the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 0.44 µg/g. Importantly, PFPrA concentrations in two geomembranes (GMB2 and GMB3) manufactured at the same facility were comparable, whereas GMB1, produced at a different plant, exhibited concentrations nearly an order of magnitude higher. This disparity suggests potential differences in polymer processing aid (PPA) formulations, PFAS-containing additives, or variations in manufacturing processes. TF measurements for all samples fell below the reporting limit, indicating that large quantities of other PFAS were unlikely to be present. However, the high limit of quantification (LOQ) of 5 mg/kg for TF analysis likely resulted in excessive data censoring, highlighting the need for more sensitive TF detection methods. As regulatory pressures drive a transition toward PFAS-free polymer processing aids, a significant issue may arise if unregulated or unknown PFAS substitutes are used in place of regulated or guideline-referenced PFAS chemicals. Future research should investigate a broader range of geomembrane types and PFAS analytes, enabling more generalised conclusions to be drawn regarding the presence of PFAS in geomembranes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100723"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the hypothesis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) presence in HDPE geomembranes\",\"authors\":\"Xinyan Xiang,&nbsp;Abdelmalek Bouazza,&nbsp;Elissar Mikhael\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembranes, which are commonly utilised in waste containment facilities, hydraulic infrastructure and other engineering applications. Three different HDPE geomembranes (GMBs) were analysed for PFAS content using targeted detection of six specific analytes and total fluorine (TF) measurements. To assess PFAS leachability under different conditions, extraction experiments were conducted using solutions with varying methanol concentrations. The results showed that perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA), an ultra-short-chain PFAS, was detected in all tested geomembranes at concentrations ranging from below the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 0.44 µg/g. Importantly, PFPrA concentrations in two geomembranes (GMB2 and GMB3) manufactured at the same facility were comparable, whereas GMB1, produced at a different plant, exhibited concentrations nearly an order of magnitude higher. This disparity suggests potential differences in polymer processing aid (PPA) formulations, PFAS-containing additives, or variations in manufacturing processes. TF measurements for all samples fell below the reporting limit, indicating that large quantities of other PFAS were unlikely to be present. However, the high limit of quantification (LOQ) of 5 mg/kg for TF analysis likely resulted in excessive data censoring, highlighting the need for more sensitive TF detection methods. As regulatory pressures drive a transition toward PFAS-free polymer processing aids, a significant issue may arise if unregulated or unknown PFAS substitutes are used in place of regulated or guideline-referenced PFAS chemicals. Future research should investigate a broader range of geomembrane types and PFAS analytes, enabling more generalised conclusions to be drawn regarding the presence of PFAS in geomembranes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625001354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625001354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了高密度聚乙烯土工膜中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的存在,这些土工膜通常用于废物密封设施、水利基础设施和其他工程应用。通过对六种特定分析物的靶向检测和总氟(TF)测量,分析了三种不同的HDPE土工膜(GMBs)的PFAS含量。为了评估PFAS在不同条件下的浸出性,采用不同甲醇浓度的溶液进行了提取实验。结果表明,在所有土工膜中均检测到超短链PFAS全氟丙酸(PFPrA),其浓度范围为低于定量限(LOQ)至0.44µg/g。重要的是,同一工厂生产的两种土工膜(GMB2和GMB3)中的PFPrA浓度具有可比性,而不同工厂生产的GMB1的浓度几乎高出一个数量级。这种差异表明聚合物加工助剂(PPA)配方、含PPA的添加剂或制造工艺的变化可能存在差异。所有样品的TF测量值均低于报告限值,表明不太可能存在大量其他PFAS。然而,5 mg/kg的定量限(LOQ)可能会导致过度的数据审查,这突出了对更敏感的TF检测方法的需求。随着监管压力推动向不含PFAS的聚合物加工助剂过渡,如果使用不受监管或未知的PFAS替代品代替受监管或指南参考的PFAS化学品,可能会出现重大问题。未来的研究应该调查更广泛的土工膜类型和PFAS分析物,从而得出关于土工膜中PFAS存在的更普遍的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the hypothesis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) presence in HDPE geomembranes

Evaluating the hypothesis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) presence in HDPE geomembranes
This study examines the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembranes, which are commonly utilised in waste containment facilities, hydraulic infrastructure and other engineering applications. Three different HDPE geomembranes (GMBs) were analysed for PFAS content using targeted detection of six specific analytes and total fluorine (TF) measurements. To assess PFAS leachability under different conditions, extraction experiments were conducted using solutions with varying methanol concentrations. The results showed that perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA), an ultra-short-chain PFAS, was detected in all tested geomembranes at concentrations ranging from below the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 0.44 µg/g. Importantly, PFPrA concentrations in two geomembranes (GMB2 and GMB3) manufactured at the same facility were comparable, whereas GMB1, produced at a different plant, exhibited concentrations nearly an order of magnitude higher. This disparity suggests potential differences in polymer processing aid (PPA) formulations, PFAS-containing additives, or variations in manufacturing processes. TF measurements for all samples fell below the reporting limit, indicating that large quantities of other PFAS were unlikely to be present. However, the high limit of quantification (LOQ) of 5 mg/kg for TF analysis likely resulted in excessive data censoring, highlighting the need for more sensitive TF detection methods. As regulatory pressures drive a transition toward PFAS-free polymer processing aids, a significant issue may arise if unregulated or unknown PFAS substitutes are used in place of regulated or guideline-referenced PFAS chemicals. Future research should investigate a broader range of geomembrane types and PFAS analytes, enabling more generalised conclusions to be drawn regarding the presence of PFAS in geomembranes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信