{"title":"文化的生态方法","authors":"Nicolas Baumard, Jean-Baptiste André","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevailing view in the literature treats cultural dynamics as fundamentally distinct from other ecological processes—governed by a second system of inheritance and requiring a separate set of theoretical foundations. Yet at its core, culture is simply an emergent outcome of interactions among individuals and with their shared environment—the very kind of phenomenon ecologists routinely study. In fact, in many ecosystems not considered cultural, such interactions do produce stable population differences, rapid innovations, informational changes, or even cumulative dynamics. These phenomena are more pronounced in cultural ecosystems, but they are not different in kind. Accordingly, we argue that cultural ecosystems should be studied through the same mechanisms as other ecosystems—ecological modifications, phenotypic responses, legacy effects, and ecological cascades. Different ecosystems may require specific methods or concepts, but not fundamentally different theoretical frameworks. The main strength of this deflationary view of culture lies in its parsimony. If culture is not fundamentally special, we can rely on the same robust and well-tested framework—namely, inclusive fitness theory—to understand human behavior in cultural ecosystems, just as we do for animal behavior more generally. Inclusive fitness theory, in turn, can help explain both (i) individual behavior in culturally rich ecosystems and (ii) how the interaction of such behaviors gives rise to the large-scale ecological patterns we call culture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"46 3","pages":"Article 106686"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ecological approach to culture\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Baumard, Jean-Baptiste André\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prevailing view in the literature treats cultural dynamics as fundamentally distinct from other ecological processes—governed by a second system of inheritance and requiring a separate set of theoretical foundations. Yet at its core, culture is simply an emergent outcome of interactions among individuals and with their shared environment—the very kind of phenomenon ecologists routinely study. In fact, in many ecosystems not considered cultural, such interactions do produce stable population differences, rapid innovations, informational changes, or even cumulative dynamics. These phenomena are more pronounced in cultural ecosystems, but they are not different in kind. Accordingly, we argue that cultural ecosystems should be studied through the same mechanisms as other ecosystems—ecological modifications, phenotypic responses, legacy effects, and ecological cascades. Different ecosystems may require specific methods or concepts, but not fundamentally different theoretical frameworks. The main strength of this deflationary view of culture lies in its parsimony. If culture is not fundamentally special, we can rely on the same robust and well-tested framework—namely, inclusive fitness theory—to understand human behavior in cultural ecosystems, just as we do for animal behavior more generally. Inclusive fitness theory, in turn, can help explain both (i) individual behavior in culturally rich ecosystems and (ii) how the interaction of such behaviors gives rise to the large-scale ecological patterns we call culture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 106686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825000352\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825000352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prevailing view in the literature treats cultural dynamics as fundamentally distinct from other ecological processes—governed by a second system of inheritance and requiring a separate set of theoretical foundations. Yet at its core, culture is simply an emergent outcome of interactions among individuals and with their shared environment—the very kind of phenomenon ecologists routinely study. In fact, in many ecosystems not considered cultural, such interactions do produce stable population differences, rapid innovations, informational changes, or even cumulative dynamics. These phenomena are more pronounced in cultural ecosystems, but they are not different in kind. Accordingly, we argue that cultural ecosystems should be studied through the same mechanisms as other ecosystems—ecological modifications, phenotypic responses, legacy effects, and ecological cascades. Different ecosystems may require specific methods or concepts, but not fundamentally different theoretical frameworks. The main strength of this deflationary view of culture lies in its parsimony. If culture is not fundamentally special, we can rely on the same robust and well-tested framework—namely, inclusive fitness theory—to understand human behavior in cultural ecosystems, just as we do for animal behavior more generally. Inclusive fitness theory, in turn, can help explain both (i) individual behavior in culturally rich ecosystems and (ii) how the interaction of such behaviors gives rise to the large-scale ecological patterns we call culture.
期刊介绍:
Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.