Steffen Ortmann , Thomas Lindner , Denise Meyer , Anastasia Wiedemann , Alexander Postel , Paul Becher , Ad Vos
{"title":"用两种不同毒饵口服猪瘟疫苗后猪的血清学反应比较","authors":"Steffen Ortmann , Thomas Lindner , Denise Meyer , Anastasia Wiedemann , Alexander Postel , Paul Becher , Ad Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2025.110937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a complementary tool for control of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar vaccine baits containing the attenuated and highly efficacious C-strain have been distributed in several countries. Several issues have been identified with the present available bait system, like relatively low uptake by piglets, melting point and mechanical stability. Hence, an alternative bait system has been developed including a more thermo-stable bait matrix and vaccine container. In the present study, the attractiveness and the capability of inducing an adequate immune response of this new bait system (IP) was compared with the present available product (CP) in two groups of 25 pigs each. The pigs of each group were offered the respective bait individually, and the animals were bled at 14 days prior to vaccination and 28 - and 42-days post vaccination (dpv). Blood samples were examined for antibodies in ELISA and virus neutralizing test (VNT). Two and one animal in the CP and IP group refused to consume the bait, respectively. The IP was significantly more rapidly consumed than the CP (p = 0.021). All animals that consumed a bait in both groups tested seropositive in VNT (≥10 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 28 dpv and reached antibody titers above the threshold for protective immunity (32 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 42 dpv. Hence, it can be concluded that the new bait system can induce an adequate immune response in pigs after the consumption of a single bait.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 110937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the serological responses in pigs after oral vaccination against classical swine fever using two different types of bait\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Ortmann , Thomas Lindner , Denise Meyer , Anastasia Wiedemann , Alexander Postel , Paul Becher , Ad Vos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetimm.2025.110937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As a complementary tool for control of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar vaccine baits containing the attenuated and highly efficacious C-strain have been distributed in several countries. Several issues have been identified with the present available bait system, like relatively low uptake by piglets, melting point and mechanical stability. Hence, an alternative bait system has been developed including a more thermo-stable bait matrix and vaccine container. In the present study, the attractiveness and the capability of inducing an adequate immune response of this new bait system (IP) was compared with the present available product (CP) in two groups of 25 pigs each. The pigs of each group were offered the respective bait individually, and the animals were bled at 14 days prior to vaccination and 28 - and 42-days post vaccination (dpv). Blood samples were examined for antibodies in ELISA and virus neutralizing test (VNT). Two and one animal in the CP and IP group refused to consume the bait, respectively. The IP was significantly more rapidly consumed than the CP (p = 0.021). All animals that consumed a bait in both groups tested seropositive in VNT (≥10 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 28 dpv and reached antibody titers above the threshold for protective immunity (32 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 42 dpv. Hence, it can be concluded that the new bait system can induce an adequate immune response in pigs after the consumption of a single bait.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"volume\":\"284 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242725000571\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242725000571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the serological responses in pigs after oral vaccination against classical swine fever using two different types of bait
As a complementary tool for control of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar vaccine baits containing the attenuated and highly efficacious C-strain have been distributed in several countries. Several issues have been identified with the present available bait system, like relatively low uptake by piglets, melting point and mechanical stability. Hence, an alternative bait system has been developed including a more thermo-stable bait matrix and vaccine container. In the present study, the attractiveness and the capability of inducing an adequate immune response of this new bait system (IP) was compared with the present available product (CP) in two groups of 25 pigs each. The pigs of each group were offered the respective bait individually, and the animals were bled at 14 days prior to vaccination and 28 - and 42-days post vaccination (dpv). Blood samples were examined for antibodies in ELISA and virus neutralizing test (VNT). Two and one animal in the CP and IP group refused to consume the bait, respectively. The IP was significantly more rapidly consumed than the CP (p = 0.021). All animals that consumed a bait in both groups tested seropositive in VNT (≥10 ND50) at 28 dpv and reached antibody titers above the threshold for protective immunity (32 ND50) at 42 dpv. Hence, it can be concluded that the new bait system can induce an adequate immune response in pigs after the consumption of a single bait.
期刊介绍:
The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease.
Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above.
The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.