用两种不同毒饵口服猪瘟疫苗后猪的血清学反应比较

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Steffen Ortmann , Thomas Lindner , Denise Meyer , Anastasia Wiedemann , Alexander Postel , Paul Becher , Ad Vos
{"title":"用两种不同毒饵口服猪瘟疫苗后猪的血清学反应比较","authors":"Steffen Ortmann ,&nbsp;Thomas Lindner ,&nbsp;Denise Meyer ,&nbsp;Anastasia Wiedemann ,&nbsp;Alexander Postel ,&nbsp;Paul Becher ,&nbsp;Ad Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2025.110937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a complementary tool for control of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar vaccine baits containing the attenuated and highly efficacious C-strain have been distributed in several countries. Several issues have been identified with the present available bait system, like relatively low uptake by piglets, melting point and mechanical stability. Hence, an alternative bait system has been developed including a more thermo-stable bait matrix and vaccine container. In the present study, the attractiveness and the capability of inducing an adequate immune response of this new bait system (IP) was compared with the present available product (CP) in two groups of 25 pigs each. The pigs of each group were offered the respective bait individually, and the animals were bled at 14 days prior to vaccination and 28 - and 42-days post vaccination (dpv). Blood samples were examined for antibodies in ELISA and virus neutralizing test (VNT). Two and one animal in the CP and IP group refused to consume the bait, respectively. The IP was significantly more rapidly consumed than the CP (p = 0.021). All animals that consumed a bait in both groups tested seropositive in VNT (≥10 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 28 dpv and reached antibody titers above the threshold for protective immunity (32 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 42 dpv. Hence, it can be concluded that the new bait system can induce an adequate immune response in pigs after the consumption of a single bait.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 110937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the serological responses in pigs after oral vaccination against classical swine fever using two different types of bait\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Ortmann ,&nbsp;Thomas Lindner ,&nbsp;Denise Meyer ,&nbsp;Anastasia Wiedemann ,&nbsp;Alexander Postel ,&nbsp;Paul Becher ,&nbsp;Ad Vos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetimm.2025.110937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As a complementary tool for control of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar vaccine baits containing the attenuated and highly efficacious C-strain have been distributed in several countries. Several issues have been identified with the present available bait system, like relatively low uptake by piglets, melting point and mechanical stability. Hence, an alternative bait system has been developed including a more thermo-stable bait matrix and vaccine container. In the present study, the attractiveness and the capability of inducing an adequate immune response of this new bait system (IP) was compared with the present available product (CP) in two groups of 25 pigs each. The pigs of each group were offered the respective bait individually, and the animals were bled at 14 days prior to vaccination and 28 - and 42-days post vaccination (dpv). Blood samples were examined for antibodies in ELISA and virus neutralizing test (VNT). Two and one animal in the CP and IP group refused to consume the bait, respectively. The IP was significantly more rapidly consumed than the CP (p = 0.021). All animals that consumed a bait in both groups tested seropositive in VNT (≥10 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 28 dpv and reached antibody titers above the threshold for protective immunity (32 ND<sub>50</sub>) at 42 dpv. Hence, it can be concluded that the new bait system can induce an adequate immune response in pigs after the consumption of a single bait.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"volume\":\"284 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242725000571\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242725000571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为控制经典猪瘟(CSF)的一种补充工具,含有减毒和高效的c -菌株的野猪疫苗诱饵已在一些国家分发。目前已有的饵料系统存在几个问题,如仔猪吸收量相对较低、熔点和机械稳定性。因此,已经开发了一种替代诱饵系统,包括更热稳定的诱饵基质和疫苗容器。在本研究中,将这种新型饵料系统(IP)的吸引力和诱导免疫反应的能力与现有产品(CP)进行了比较,每组25头猪。各组猪分别饲喂饵料,分别于接种前14天、接种后28天和42天(dpv)放血。采用ELISA和病毒中和试验(VNT)检测血样中的抗体。CP组和IP组分别有2只和1只动物拒绝食用饵料。IP的消耗速度明显快于CP (p = 0.021)。两组动物在28 dpv时血清VNT呈阳性(≥10 ND50), 42 dpv时抗体滴度高于保护性免疫阈值(32 ND50)。因此,可以得出结论,新的饵料系统可以在猪食用单一饵料后诱导足够的免疫反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the serological responses in pigs after oral vaccination against classical swine fever using two different types of bait
As a complementary tool for control of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar vaccine baits containing the attenuated and highly efficacious C-strain have been distributed in several countries. Several issues have been identified with the present available bait system, like relatively low uptake by piglets, melting point and mechanical stability. Hence, an alternative bait system has been developed including a more thermo-stable bait matrix and vaccine container. In the present study, the attractiveness and the capability of inducing an adequate immune response of this new bait system (IP) was compared with the present available product (CP) in two groups of 25 pigs each. The pigs of each group were offered the respective bait individually, and the animals were bled at 14 days prior to vaccination and 28 - and 42-days post vaccination (dpv). Blood samples were examined for antibodies in ELISA and virus neutralizing test (VNT). Two and one animal in the CP and IP group refused to consume the bait, respectively. The IP was significantly more rapidly consumed than the CP (p = 0.021). All animals that consumed a bait in both groups tested seropositive in VNT (≥10 ND50) at 28 dpv and reached antibody titers above the threshold for protective immunity (32 ND50) at 42 dpv. Hence, it can be concluded that the new bait system can induce an adequate immune response in pigs after the consumption of a single bait.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease. Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above. The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信