Junji Ou , Fangzheng Chen , Min Zhang , William David Batchelor , Bin Wang , Dingrong Wu , Xiaodong Ma , Zengguang Zhang , Kelin Hu , Puyu Feng
{"title":"基于物理引导的作物物候模拟深度学习的连续学习框架","authors":"Junji Ou , Fangzheng Chen , Min Zhang , William David Batchelor , Bin Wang , Dingrong Wu , Xiaodong Ma , Zengguang Zhang , Kelin Hu , Puyu Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Process-based models (PBMs) and artificial intelligence models (AIMs) are both widely used to simulate crop growth under various environmental conditions and farm management practices. PBMs offer the advantage of interpretable simulations due to their mechanistic underpinnings, but the latest insights from crop growth mechanism research are often not promptly incorporated into PBMs. Further, while AIMs can directly extract potential patterns from data, they struggle to generate temporally continuous simulations due to their lack of consideration for crop growth processes, thus limiting the interpretability of their simulations. To synergize the strengths of PBMs and AIMs, we developed a continuous learning framework, AGLPF (APSIM Guided LSTM Phenology Framework), to dynamically simulate the changes in maize phenology across the Chinese Maize Belt. The AGLPF consists of a PBM (APSIM), its phenology dataset, and an AIM based on attention-Long short-term memory (LSTM). When initially training the AIM in AGLPF by the PBM output dataset, the AGLPF was capable of replicating the PBM outcomes, with an average RMSE of 0.8 days for the vegetative growth phase and flowering phase, 1.4 days for the grain filling phase and 2.0 days for the full growing cycle. With incremental actual phenology data from 0 to 12 years being used for self-tuning training, the simulations of the AGLPF increasingly aligned with actual data. Notably, the RMSE of the full growing cycle steadily declined from 27.8 days to 5.5 days. Moreover, the self-tuning training method performed better than the from-scratch training method in the simulation of all the phenological phases. The development of AGLPF has provided a framework to consider physics-guided AIM to simulate crop phenology and even other crop-related variables while being easy to upgrade and easily interpret outputs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"368 ","pages":"Article 110562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A continuous learning framework based on physics-guided deep learning for crop phenology simulation\",\"authors\":\"Junji Ou , Fangzheng Chen , Min Zhang , William David Batchelor , Bin Wang , Dingrong Wu , Xiaodong Ma , Zengguang Zhang , Kelin Hu , Puyu Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Process-based models (PBMs) and artificial intelligence models (AIMs) are both widely used to simulate crop growth under various environmental conditions and farm management practices. PBMs offer the advantage of interpretable simulations due to their mechanistic underpinnings, but the latest insights from crop growth mechanism research are often not promptly incorporated into PBMs. Further, while AIMs can directly extract potential patterns from data, they struggle to generate temporally continuous simulations due to their lack of consideration for crop growth processes, thus limiting the interpretability of their simulations. To synergize the strengths of PBMs and AIMs, we developed a continuous learning framework, AGLPF (APSIM Guided LSTM Phenology Framework), to dynamically simulate the changes in maize phenology across the Chinese Maize Belt. The AGLPF consists of a PBM (APSIM), its phenology dataset, and an AIM based on attention-Long short-term memory (LSTM). When initially training the AIM in AGLPF by the PBM output dataset, the AGLPF was capable of replicating the PBM outcomes, with an average RMSE of 0.8 days for the vegetative growth phase and flowering phase, 1.4 days for the grain filling phase and 2.0 days for the full growing cycle. With incremental actual phenology data from 0 to 12 years being used for self-tuning training, the simulations of the AGLPF increasingly aligned with actual data. Notably, the RMSE of the full growing cycle steadily declined from 27.8 days to 5.5 days. Moreover, the self-tuning training method performed better than the from-scratch training method in the simulation of all the phenological phases. The development of AGLPF has provided a framework to consider physics-guided AIM to simulate crop phenology and even other crop-related variables while being easy to upgrade and easily interpret outputs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"368 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325001820\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325001820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A continuous learning framework based on physics-guided deep learning for crop phenology simulation
Process-based models (PBMs) and artificial intelligence models (AIMs) are both widely used to simulate crop growth under various environmental conditions and farm management practices. PBMs offer the advantage of interpretable simulations due to their mechanistic underpinnings, but the latest insights from crop growth mechanism research are often not promptly incorporated into PBMs. Further, while AIMs can directly extract potential patterns from data, they struggle to generate temporally continuous simulations due to their lack of consideration for crop growth processes, thus limiting the interpretability of their simulations. To synergize the strengths of PBMs and AIMs, we developed a continuous learning framework, AGLPF (APSIM Guided LSTM Phenology Framework), to dynamically simulate the changes in maize phenology across the Chinese Maize Belt. The AGLPF consists of a PBM (APSIM), its phenology dataset, and an AIM based on attention-Long short-term memory (LSTM). When initially training the AIM in AGLPF by the PBM output dataset, the AGLPF was capable of replicating the PBM outcomes, with an average RMSE of 0.8 days for the vegetative growth phase and flowering phase, 1.4 days for the grain filling phase and 2.0 days for the full growing cycle. With incremental actual phenology data from 0 to 12 years being used for self-tuning training, the simulations of the AGLPF increasingly aligned with actual data. Notably, the RMSE of the full growing cycle steadily declined from 27.8 days to 5.5 days. Moreover, the self-tuning training method performed better than the from-scratch training method in the simulation of all the phenological phases. The development of AGLPF has provided a framework to consider physics-guided AIM to simulate crop phenology and even other crop-related variables while being easy to upgrade and easily interpret outputs.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.