澳大利亚陆路货运的转型:燃料电池电动、电池电动和内燃机汽车的竞争

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Aliakbar Boroujerdi , Yeliz Simsek , Parisa A. Bahri , Tania Urmee
{"title":"澳大利亚陆路货运的转型:燃料电池电动、电池电动和内燃机汽车的竞争","authors":"Aliakbar Boroujerdi ,&nbsp;Yeliz Simsek ,&nbsp;Parisa A. Bahri ,&nbsp;Tania Urmee","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the urgent need to decarbonise the transport sector, a comprehensive analysis of alternative fuel technologies is essential. This study introduces an innovative freight transport model, incorporating a novel approach to calculating vehicle time costs, refuelling time, and energy intensity, applied to Australia’s freight sector. Findings indicate that under moderate development, battery electric vehicles gain a larger share in light commercial vehicles, while fuel cell electric vehicles dominate the truck segment. In high development scenarios, battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles achieve closer parity across all vehicle types. The transition impacts refuelling infrastructure, with significant shifts in petrol and diesel station numbers, posing potential investment risks for diesel stations due to fluctuating demand across scenarios. High development scenarios highlight a substantial need for investment, driven by a surge in hydrogen station requirements and battery electric vehicle charger demand peaking at approximately 120,000 units in the internal combustion engine-ban scenario. Emission trends vary by scenario. Under reference and moderate development scenarios, total tank-to-wheel and well-to-wheel emissions increase over time. However, the internal combustion engine-ban and comprehensive scenarios lead to substantial emission reductions, underscoring the environmental significance of policy choices and technological advancements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 119798"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning Australia’s land freight transport: Competition of fuel cell electric, battery electric, and internal combustion engine vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Aliakbar Boroujerdi ,&nbsp;Yeliz Simsek ,&nbsp;Parisa A. Bahri ,&nbsp;Tania Urmee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given the urgent need to decarbonise the transport sector, a comprehensive analysis of alternative fuel technologies is essential. This study introduces an innovative freight transport model, incorporating a novel approach to calculating vehicle time costs, refuelling time, and energy intensity, applied to Australia’s freight sector. Findings indicate that under moderate development, battery electric vehicles gain a larger share in light commercial vehicles, while fuel cell electric vehicles dominate the truck segment. In high development scenarios, battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles achieve closer parity across all vehicle types. The transition impacts refuelling infrastructure, with significant shifts in petrol and diesel station numbers, posing potential investment risks for diesel stations due to fluctuating demand across scenarios. High development scenarios highlight a substantial need for investment, driven by a surge in hydrogen station requirements and battery electric vehicle charger demand peaking at approximately 120,000 units in the internal combustion engine-ban scenario. Emission trends vary by scenario. Under reference and moderate development scenarios, total tank-to-wheel and well-to-wheel emissions increase over time. However, the internal combustion engine-ban and comprehensive scenarios lead to substantial emission reductions, underscoring the environmental significance of policy choices and technological advancements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"333 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003218\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003218","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到运输部门脱碳的迫切需要,对替代燃料技术进行全面分析是必不可少的。本研究介绍了一种创新的货运模型,结合了一种计算车辆时间成本、加油时间和能源强度的新方法,适用于澳大利亚的货运部门。研究结果表明,在适度发展的情况下,电池电动汽车在轻型商用车中占有更大的份额,而燃料电池电动汽车在卡车领域占据主导地位。在高速发展的情况下,电池电动汽车和燃料电池电动汽车在所有类型的汽车中实现更接近的平价。这一转变影响了加油基础设施,汽油站和柴油站的数量发生了重大变化,由于不同情景下需求的波动,给柴油站带来了潜在的投资风险。高发展情景强调了大量的投资需求,这是由氢站需求激增和电池电动汽车充电器需求在内燃机禁令情景中达到约12万台的峰值所驱动的。排放趋势因情景而异。在参考和适度开发情景下,随着时间的推移,油罐到轮和井到轮的总排放量会增加。然而,内燃机禁令和综合方案导致大量减排,强调了政策选择和技术进步的环境意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning Australia’s land freight transport: Competition of fuel cell electric, battery electric, and internal combustion engine vehicles
Given the urgent need to decarbonise the transport sector, a comprehensive analysis of alternative fuel technologies is essential. This study introduces an innovative freight transport model, incorporating a novel approach to calculating vehicle time costs, refuelling time, and energy intensity, applied to Australia’s freight sector. Findings indicate that under moderate development, battery electric vehicles gain a larger share in light commercial vehicles, while fuel cell electric vehicles dominate the truck segment. In high development scenarios, battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles achieve closer parity across all vehicle types. The transition impacts refuelling infrastructure, with significant shifts in petrol and diesel station numbers, posing potential investment risks for diesel stations due to fluctuating demand across scenarios. High development scenarios highlight a substantial need for investment, driven by a surge in hydrogen station requirements and battery electric vehicle charger demand peaking at approximately 120,000 units in the internal combustion engine-ban scenario. Emission trends vary by scenario. Under reference and moderate development scenarios, total tank-to-wheel and well-to-wheel emissions increase over time. However, the internal combustion engine-ban and comprehensive scenarios lead to substantial emission reductions, underscoring the environmental significance of policy choices and technological advancements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信