基于直接强度法的托盘架柱结构可靠性设计

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Victor A.M. Faria , Marcílio S.R. Freitas , André L.R. Brandão
{"title":"基于直接强度法的托盘架柱结构可靠性设计","authors":"Victor A.M. Faria ,&nbsp;Marcílio S.R. Freitas ,&nbsp;André L.R. Brandão","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rack columns are among the various structural components that compose pallet-rack storage systems. These columns possess complex geometries and hole patterns, making strength prediction challenging. Most design codes for pallet-rack structures rely on experimental tests to support strength prediction for the columns, while semi-analytical methods, such as the Direct Strength Method (DSM), have become predominant in the design of cold-formed steel members in compression. This paper evaluates the safety of rack column designs using adaptations of the DSM. The reliability analysis was based on reliability indices calculated through first order reliability analysis and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Load combinations were selected from the ANSI MH16.1 (LRFD), AISI S100/NBCC (LSD), and NBR 15524–2 standards to assess whether the design using the selected adaptations meets the target reliability indices across a selected range of product-to-dead load ratios. The seven pure semi-analytical adaptations did not achieve the target reliability values. Only methodologies employing the Reduced Thickness Method met the target for certain limit state. These methodologies were still imprecise for the local-global buckling limit state, necessitating the calibration of new resistance factors for potential future adoption in standards such as ANSI MH16.1 and NBR 15524–2.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 113294"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural reliability of the design of pallet-rack columns via Direct Strength Method\",\"authors\":\"Victor A.M. Faria ,&nbsp;Marcílio S.R. Freitas ,&nbsp;André L.R. Brandão\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rack columns are among the various structural components that compose pallet-rack storage systems. These columns possess complex geometries and hole patterns, making strength prediction challenging. Most design codes for pallet-rack structures rely on experimental tests to support strength prediction for the columns, while semi-analytical methods, such as the Direct Strength Method (DSM), have become predominant in the design of cold-formed steel members in compression. This paper evaluates the safety of rack column designs using adaptations of the DSM. The reliability analysis was based on reliability indices calculated through first order reliability analysis and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Load combinations were selected from the ANSI MH16.1 (LRFD), AISI S100/NBCC (LSD), and NBR 15524–2 standards to assess whether the design using the selected adaptations meets the target reliability indices across a selected range of product-to-dead load ratios. The seven pure semi-analytical adaptations did not achieve the target reliability values. Only methodologies employing the Reduced Thickness Method met the target for certain limit state. These methodologies were still imprecise for the local-global buckling limit state, necessitating the calibration of new resistance factors for potential future adoption in standards such as ANSI MH16.1 and NBR 15524–2.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026382312500388X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026382312500388X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

货架柱是组成托盘货架存储系统的各种结构部件之一。这些柱具有复杂的几何形状和孔模式,使强度预测具有挑战性。大多数托盘架结构的设计规范依赖于实验测试来支持柱的强度预测,而半解析方法,如直接强度法(DSM),在冷弯型钢受压构件的设计中占主导地位。本文采用DSM对机架柱设计的安全性进行了评价。可靠性分析基于一阶可靠性分析和蒙特卡罗仿真(MCS)计算的可靠性指标。从ANSI MH16.1 (LRFD), AISI S100/NBCC (LSD)和NBR 15524-2标准中选择负载组合,以评估使用所选适应性的设计是否在选定的产品与恒载比范围内满足目标可靠性指标。七个纯半分析适应没有达到目标可靠性值。只有采用减厚法的方法才能满足某些极限状态的目标。这些方法对于局部-全局屈曲极限状态仍然不精确,需要校准新的阻力因子,以便将来在ANSI MH16.1和NBR 15524-2等标准中采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural reliability of the design of pallet-rack columns via Direct Strength Method
Rack columns are among the various structural components that compose pallet-rack storage systems. These columns possess complex geometries and hole patterns, making strength prediction challenging. Most design codes for pallet-rack structures rely on experimental tests to support strength prediction for the columns, while semi-analytical methods, such as the Direct Strength Method (DSM), have become predominant in the design of cold-formed steel members in compression. This paper evaluates the safety of rack column designs using adaptations of the DSM. The reliability analysis was based on reliability indices calculated through first order reliability analysis and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Load combinations were selected from the ANSI MH16.1 (LRFD), AISI S100/NBCC (LSD), and NBR 15524–2 standards to assess whether the design using the selected adaptations meets the target reliability indices across a selected range of product-to-dead load ratios. The seven pure semi-analytical adaptations did not achieve the target reliability values. Only methodologies employing the Reduced Thickness Method met the target for certain limit state. These methodologies were still imprecise for the local-global buckling limit state, necessitating the calibration of new resistance factors for potential future adoption in standards such as ANSI MH16.1 and NBR 15524–2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信