植被恢复对放牧和退化沙地土壤微生物坏死体碳和有机碳的影响

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Huiling Zhou , Qing Qu , Hongwei Xu , Minggang Wang , Sha Xue
{"title":"植被恢复对放牧和退化沙地土壤微生物坏死体碳和有机碳的影响","authors":"Huiling Zhou ,&nbsp;Qing Qu ,&nbsp;Hongwei Xu ,&nbsp;Minggang Wang ,&nbsp;Sha Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetation restoration effectively enhances carbon (C) sequestration and supports the sustainable management of degraded ecosystems. However, its impact on the accumulation of microbial necromass C (NC) and soil organic C (SOC) in degraded and grazed sandy land remains unclear. This study evaluated six restoration types—grazing plot (control), grassland, scrubland, and forestland of <em>Populus alba</em>, <em>Pinus tabuliformis</em>, and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>—to analyze microbial NC and SOC accumulation and identify the factors influencing these changes from the perspectives of soil nutrients, microbial structure, diversity, and activity. Compared with the grazing plot, SOC, bacterial NC, fungal NC, and microbial NC in restored sandy land increased by 64.2–140.9 %, 74.1–101.1 %, 135.7–221.4 %, and 41.5–63.8 %, respectively. The fungal NC:bacterial NC ratio was higher in restored land than in degraded land. Grassland exhibited a higher SOC content than <em>Pinus tabuliformis</em> and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>, while <em>Populus alba</em> showed higher fungal and microbial NC contents than <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>. Soil total nitrogen (TN) and β-D-cellobiosidase were identified as key factors influencing SOC and microbial NC accumulation.This study highlights the critical role of vegetation restoration in enhancing soil C sequestration and promoting ecosystem sustainability. These findings provide a theoretical reference for ecological restoration and the sustainable development of degraded sandy land in regional desert steppe ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 125380"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of vegetation restoration on soil microbial necromass carbon and organic carbon in grazed and degraded sandy land\",\"authors\":\"Huiling Zhou ,&nbsp;Qing Qu ,&nbsp;Hongwei Xu ,&nbsp;Minggang Wang ,&nbsp;Sha Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vegetation restoration effectively enhances carbon (C) sequestration and supports the sustainable management of degraded ecosystems. However, its impact on the accumulation of microbial necromass C (NC) and soil organic C (SOC) in degraded and grazed sandy land remains unclear. This study evaluated six restoration types—grazing plot (control), grassland, scrubland, and forestland of <em>Populus alba</em>, <em>Pinus tabuliformis</em>, and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>—to analyze microbial NC and SOC accumulation and identify the factors influencing these changes from the perspectives of soil nutrients, microbial structure, diversity, and activity. Compared with the grazing plot, SOC, bacterial NC, fungal NC, and microbial NC in restored sandy land increased by 64.2–140.9 %, 74.1–101.1 %, 135.7–221.4 %, and 41.5–63.8 %, respectively. The fungal NC:bacterial NC ratio was higher in restored land than in degraded land. Grassland exhibited a higher SOC content than <em>Pinus tabuliformis</em> and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>, while <em>Populus alba</em> showed higher fungal and microbial NC contents than <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>. Soil total nitrogen (TN) and β-D-cellobiosidase were identified as key factors influencing SOC and microbial NC accumulation.This study highlights the critical role of vegetation restoration in enhancing soil C sequestration and promoting ecosystem sustainability. These findings provide a theoretical reference for ecological restoration and the sustainable development of degraded sandy land in regional desert steppe ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"382 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植被恢复可有效增强碳(C)固存,支持退化生态系统的可持续管理。但其对退化和放牧沙地微生物坏死体C (NC)和土壤有机C (SOC)积累的影响尚不清楚。本研究对白杨、油松和刺槐6种恢复类型(放牧(对照)、草地、灌丛和林地)进行评价,从土壤养分、微生物结构、多样性和活性等方面分析土壤微生物NC和有机碳积累,并找出影响这些变化的因素。与放牧地相比,恢复沙地土壤有机碳、细菌有机碳、真菌有机碳和微生物有机碳分别增加了64.2 ~ 140.9%、74.1 ~ 101.1%、135.7 ~ 221.4%和41.5 ~ 63.8%。恢复地真菌NC:细菌NC比高于退化地。草地土壤有机碳含量高于油松和刺槐,白杨土壤真菌和微生物有机碳含量高于刺槐。土壤全氮(TN)和β- d -纤维素苷酶是影响有机碳和微生物NC积累的关键因素。本研究强调了植被恢复在增强土壤固碳和促进生态系统可持续性方面的重要作用。研究结果为区域荒漠草原生态系统退化沙地的生态恢复和可持续发展提供了理论参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of vegetation restoration on soil microbial necromass carbon and organic carbon in grazed and degraded sandy land
Vegetation restoration effectively enhances carbon (C) sequestration and supports the sustainable management of degraded ecosystems. However, its impact on the accumulation of microbial necromass C (NC) and soil organic C (SOC) in degraded and grazed sandy land remains unclear. This study evaluated six restoration types—grazing plot (control), grassland, scrubland, and forestland of Populus alba, Pinus tabuliformis, and Robinia pseudoacacia—to analyze microbial NC and SOC accumulation and identify the factors influencing these changes from the perspectives of soil nutrients, microbial structure, diversity, and activity. Compared with the grazing plot, SOC, bacterial NC, fungal NC, and microbial NC in restored sandy land increased by 64.2–140.9 %, 74.1–101.1 %, 135.7–221.4 %, and 41.5–63.8 %, respectively. The fungal NC:bacterial NC ratio was higher in restored land than in degraded land. Grassland exhibited a higher SOC content than Pinus tabuliformis and Robinia pseudoacacia, while Populus alba showed higher fungal and microbial NC contents than Robinia pseudoacacia. Soil total nitrogen (TN) and β-D-cellobiosidase were identified as key factors influencing SOC and microbial NC accumulation.This study highlights the critical role of vegetation restoration in enhancing soil C sequestration and promoting ecosystem sustainability. These findings provide a theoretical reference for ecological restoration and the sustainable development of degraded sandy land in regional desert steppe ecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信