Kurzyca Iwona , Czerwińska Sandra , Zioła-Frankowska Anetta , Kowalski Artur , Frankowski Marcin
{"title":"多环芳烃(PAH)在不同特征熏猪肉组织中的分布","authors":"Kurzyca Iwona , Czerwińska Sandra , Zioła-Frankowska Anetta , Kowalski Artur , Frankowski Marcin","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the distribution of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in traditionally and industrially smoked pork (loin, neck, bacon), focusing on differences between tissue types. The samples were analyzed using GC-FID after solid-liquid and solid-phase extraction.</div><div>In traditionally smoked loin (median 9.73 μg/kg), the highest PAH concentration was in the skin (14.95 μg/kg), followed by exterior (6.46 μg/kg), interior (1.72 μg/kg) and center (0.10 μg/kg). In industrially smoked lion, median concentration was 0.61 μg/kg in the skin, no PAH were detected in the interior. For traditionally smoked neck (median 28.38 μg/kg) adipose tissue contained about 20 % less PAH than skin, but about 30 % more than marble and 60 % more than lean tissue. In traditionally smoked bacon (median 52.71 μg/kg), fat tissue contained 10 % less than skin and 20 % more than lean layer. Industrially smoked bacon had PAH levels below 1 μg/kg; light hydrocarbons prevailed.</div><div>Post-smoking stages (drying, aging, vacuum wrapping) reduced PAH levels by 11–32 % (up to 24 % in exterior and 10 % in interior).</div><div>Risk assessment indicated that weekly consumption of 50 g of smoked pork posed negligible cancer risk for all meat species, though daily bacon intake may pose a slight risk.</div><div>The study highlights PAH variability across pork tissues, helping consumers make health-conscious dietary choices while preserving smoked pork consumption traditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":317,"journal":{"name":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in smoked pork tissue of different characteristic\",\"authors\":\"Kurzyca Iwona , Czerwińska Sandra , Zioła-Frankowska Anetta , Kowalski Artur , Frankowski Marcin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the distribution of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in traditionally and industrially smoked pork (loin, neck, bacon), focusing on differences between tissue types. The samples were analyzed using GC-FID after solid-liquid and solid-phase extraction.</div><div>In traditionally smoked loin (median 9.73 μg/kg), the highest PAH concentration was in the skin (14.95 μg/kg), followed by exterior (6.46 μg/kg), interior (1.72 μg/kg) and center (0.10 μg/kg). In industrially smoked lion, median concentration was 0.61 μg/kg in the skin, no PAH were detected in the interior. For traditionally smoked neck (median 28.38 μg/kg) adipose tissue contained about 20 % less PAH than skin, but about 30 % more than marble and 60 % more than lean tissue. In traditionally smoked bacon (median 52.71 μg/kg), fat tissue contained 10 % less than skin and 20 % more than lean layer. Industrially smoked bacon had PAH levels below 1 μg/kg; light hydrocarbons prevailed.</div><div>Post-smoking stages (drying, aging, vacuum wrapping) reduced PAH levels by 11–32 % (up to 24 % in exterior and 10 % in interior).</div><div>Risk assessment indicated that weekly consumption of 50 g of smoked pork posed negligible cancer risk for all meat species, though daily bacon intake may pose a slight risk.</div><div>The study highlights PAH variability across pork tissues, helping consumers make health-conscious dietary choices while preserving smoked pork consumption traditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Chemical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Chemical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525002030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525002030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in smoked pork tissue of different characteristic
This study investigates the distribution of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in traditionally and industrially smoked pork (loin, neck, bacon), focusing on differences between tissue types. The samples were analyzed using GC-FID after solid-liquid and solid-phase extraction.
In traditionally smoked loin (median 9.73 μg/kg), the highest PAH concentration was in the skin (14.95 μg/kg), followed by exterior (6.46 μg/kg), interior (1.72 μg/kg) and center (0.10 μg/kg). In industrially smoked lion, median concentration was 0.61 μg/kg in the skin, no PAH were detected in the interior. For traditionally smoked neck (median 28.38 μg/kg) adipose tissue contained about 20 % less PAH than skin, but about 30 % more than marble and 60 % more than lean tissue. In traditionally smoked bacon (median 52.71 μg/kg), fat tissue contained 10 % less than skin and 20 % more than lean layer. Industrially smoked bacon had PAH levels below 1 μg/kg; light hydrocarbons prevailed.
Post-smoking stages (drying, aging, vacuum wrapping) reduced PAH levels by 11–32 % (up to 24 % in exterior and 10 % in interior).
Risk assessment indicated that weekly consumption of 50 g of smoked pork posed negligible cancer risk for all meat species, though daily bacon intake may pose a slight risk.
The study highlights PAH variability across pork tissues, helping consumers make health-conscious dietary choices while preserving smoked pork consumption traditions.
期刊介绍:
Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an internationally renowned journal, that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects, in animals and humans, of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs, and chemicals, including agricultural and industrial safety, and consumer product safety. Areas such as safety evaluation of novel foods and ingredients, biotechnologically-derived products, and nanomaterials are included in the scope of the journal. FCT also encourages submission of papers on inter-relationships between nutrition and toxicology and on in vitro techniques, particularly those fostering the 3 Rs.
The principal aim of the journal is to publish high impact, scholarly work and to serve as a multidisciplinary forum for research in toxicology. Papers submitted will be judged on the basis of scientific originality and contribution to the field, quality and subject matter. Studies should address at least one of the following:
-Adverse physiological/biochemical, or pathological changes induced by specific defined substances
-New techniques for assessing potential toxicity, including molecular biology
-Mechanisms underlying toxic phenomena
-Toxicological examinations of specific chemicals or consumer products, both those showing adverse effects and those demonstrating safety, that meet current standards of scientific acceptability.
Authors must clearly and briefly identify what novel toxic effect (s) or toxic mechanism (s) of the chemical are being reported and what their significance is in the abstract. Furthermore, sufficient doses should be included in order to provide information on NOAEL/LOAEL values.