Prachi Khanna , Lia Norman , Ida Dehmardan , Anissa Viveiros , Katelyn Greer , Malorie Ashton MacMillan , Stephanie Bidoyan , Sheila Nankia , Maria Pavlova , Nicole Racine
{"title":"青年确定的考虑因素,驱动因素和有意义的青年参与儿童虐待研究的策略","authors":"Prachi Khanna , Lia Norman , Ida Dehmardan , Anissa Viveiros , Katelyn Greer , Malorie Ashton MacMillan , Stephanie Bidoyan , Sheila Nankia , Maria Pavlova , Nicole Racine","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic research is rapidly shifting to incorporate and emphasise the expertise of youth with lived experience. However, not all research areas have been equally successful in engaging youth in research processes. Youth engagement in child maltreatment (CM) research has been sparse. To address this gap, the Better Together Child Maltreatment Priority Setting Partnership is engaging youth with lived experience, along with caregivers, clinicians, and researchers, to determine the top 10 priorities for CM research in Canada. A Youth Consultant Panel (YCP) was assembled to inform all aspects of the project from the perspectives of youth. In this discussion article, the YCP and researchers share considerations, drivers, and strategies for meaningful youth engagement in CM research based on experiences of research engagement in varying roles. First, considerations include power imbalances, potential distress and retraumatisation, and unsafe disclosure. Second, drivers for engagement in research are described – the ability to break cycles of violence, to leverage lived experience toward meaningful change, and to build new, safe relationships with peers and researchers. Finally, specific strategies to facilitate meaningful youth engagement are offered: (1) checking researcher readiness; (2) checking youth readiness; (3) considering the approach to engagement and facilitation; and (4) providing appropriate compensation and credit. This article demonstrates how engagement in CM research is intrinsically an act of resistance against past, present, and future violence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth-identified considerations, drivers, and strategies for meaningful youth engagement in child maltreatment research\",\"authors\":\"Prachi Khanna , Lia Norman , Ida Dehmardan , Anissa Viveiros , Katelyn Greer , Malorie Ashton MacMillan , Stephanie Bidoyan , Sheila Nankia , Maria Pavlova , Nicole Racine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Academic research is rapidly shifting to incorporate and emphasise the expertise of youth with lived experience. However, not all research areas have been equally successful in engaging youth in research processes. Youth engagement in child maltreatment (CM) research has been sparse. To address this gap, the Better Together Child Maltreatment Priority Setting Partnership is engaging youth with lived experience, along with caregivers, clinicians, and researchers, to determine the top 10 priorities for CM research in Canada. A Youth Consultant Panel (YCP) was assembled to inform all aspects of the project from the perspectives of youth. In this discussion article, the YCP and researchers share considerations, drivers, and strategies for meaningful youth engagement in CM research based on experiences of research engagement in varying roles. First, considerations include power imbalances, potential distress and retraumatisation, and unsafe disclosure. Second, drivers for engagement in research are described – the ability to break cycles of violence, to leverage lived experience toward meaningful change, and to build new, safe relationships with peers and researchers. Finally, specific strategies to facilitate meaningful youth engagement are offered: (1) checking researcher readiness; (2) checking youth readiness; (3) considering the approach to engagement and facilitation; and (4) providing appropriate compensation and credit. This article demonstrates how engagement in CM research is intrinsically an act of resistance against past, present, and future violence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Protection and Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Protection and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193825000506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193825000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Youth-identified considerations, drivers, and strategies for meaningful youth engagement in child maltreatment research
Academic research is rapidly shifting to incorporate and emphasise the expertise of youth with lived experience. However, not all research areas have been equally successful in engaging youth in research processes. Youth engagement in child maltreatment (CM) research has been sparse. To address this gap, the Better Together Child Maltreatment Priority Setting Partnership is engaging youth with lived experience, along with caregivers, clinicians, and researchers, to determine the top 10 priorities for CM research in Canada. A Youth Consultant Panel (YCP) was assembled to inform all aspects of the project from the perspectives of youth. In this discussion article, the YCP and researchers share considerations, drivers, and strategies for meaningful youth engagement in CM research based on experiences of research engagement in varying roles. First, considerations include power imbalances, potential distress and retraumatisation, and unsafe disclosure. Second, drivers for engagement in research are described – the ability to break cycles of violence, to leverage lived experience toward meaningful change, and to build new, safe relationships with peers and researchers. Finally, specific strategies to facilitate meaningful youth engagement are offered: (1) checking researcher readiness; (2) checking youth readiness; (3) considering the approach to engagement and facilitation; and (4) providing appropriate compensation and credit. This article demonstrates how engagement in CM research is intrinsically an act of resistance against past, present, and future violence.