Harald Böhm , Markus Müller , Markus Hildebrandt-Ahlborn , Thomas Schmalz , Malte Bellmann
{"title":"铰链式踝足矫形器矢状面轴移位对步态力学和轴-腿相对运动的影响","authors":"Harald Böhm , Markus Müller , Markus Hildebrandt-Ahlborn , Thomas Schmalz , Malte Bellmann","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The alignment of the axis in ankle-foot orthoses is essential for ensuring optimal biomechanical function and comfort for the user. Correct alignment reduces orthosis displacement, minimizes skin irritation and joint stress, and improves overall performance. This study explores the effects of varying joint axis positions on ankle-foot orthoses functionality and shaft-to-leg movement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six healthy adult males (mean age: 35 ± 12 years) participated, walking with bilateral ankle foot orthoses configured in five joint axis positions and a shod condition. A 3D motion analysis system captured kinematic and kinetic data, examining the effects of anterior, posterior, proximal, and distal axis shifts on range of motion, joint moments, energy, and shaft-to-leg relative movement (pistoning).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Anterior-posterior axis shifts significantly affected joint mechanics. Anterior alignment produced the highest dorsiflexion moments and reduced pistoning during dorsiflexion. Range of motion was reduced in all orthotic conditions compared to the shod condition. Proximal-distal shifts had minimal biomechanical impact but increased pistoning. Contrary to expectations, neutral alignment due to the recommendations of the manufacturer did not consistently minimize pistoning or preserve motion.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of anterior-posterior alignment in optimizing ankle joint function with orthotics. Specifically, anterior alignment reduced pistoning more effectively than the manufacturer-recommended neutral position, particularly during dorsiflexion. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of aligning the orthotic axis with natural joint mechanics, which can reduce motion restrictions, improve gait efficiency, and prevent harmful pressures that may cause discomfort, bruising, and inflammation around the ankle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 106527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of sagittal plane axis shifts in hinged ankle-foot orthoses on gait mechanics and shaft-to-leg relative motion\",\"authors\":\"Harald Böhm , Markus Müller , Markus Hildebrandt-Ahlborn , Thomas Schmalz , Malte Bellmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The alignment of the axis in ankle-foot orthoses is essential for ensuring optimal biomechanical function and comfort for the user. Correct alignment reduces orthosis displacement, minimizes skin irritation and joint stress, and improves overall performance. This study explores the effects of varying joint axis positions on ankle-foot orthoses functionality and shaft-to-leg movement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six healthy adult males (mean age: 35 ± 12 years) participated, walking with bilateral ankle foot orthoses configured in five joint axis positions and a shod condition. A 3D motion analysis system captured kinematic and kinetic data, examining the effects of anterior, posterior, proximal, and distal axis shifts on range of motion, joint moments, energy, and shaft-to-leg relative movement (pistoning).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Anterior-posterior axis shifts significantly affected joint mechanics. Anterior alignment produced the highest dorsiflexion moments and reduced pistoning during dorsiflexion. Range of motion was reduced in all orthotic conditions compared to the shod condition. Proximal-distal shifts had minimal biomechanical impact but increased pistoning. Contrary to expectations, neutral alignment due to the recommendations of the manufacturer did not consistently minimize pistoning or preserve motion.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of anterior-posterior alignment in optimizing ankle joint function with orthotics. Specifically, anterior alignment reduced pistoning more effectively than the manufacturer-recommended neutral position, particularly during dorsiflexion. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of aligning the orthotic axis with natural joint mechanics, which can reduce motion restrictions, improve gait efficiency, and prevent harmful pressures that may cause discomfort, bruising, and inflammation around the ankle.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325001007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325001007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of sagittal plane axis shifts in hinged ankle-foot orthoses on gait mechanics and shaft-to-leg relative motion
Background
The alignment of the axis in ankle-foot orthoses is essential for ensuring optimal biomechanical function and comfort for the user. Correct alignment reduces orthosis displacement, minimizes skin irritation and joint stress, and improves overall performance. This study explores the effects of varying joint axis positions on ankle-foot orthoses functionality and shaft-to-leg movement.
Methods
Six healthy adult males (mean age: 35 ± 12 years) participated, walking with bilateral ankle foot orthoses configured in five joint axis positions and a shod condition. A 3D motion analysis system captured kinematic and kinetic data, examining the effects of anterior, posterior, proximal, and distal axis shifts on range of motion, joint moments, energy, and shaft-to-leg relative movement (pistoning).
Findings
Anterior-posterior axis shifts significantly affected joint mechanics. Anterior alignment produced the highest dorsiflexion moments and reduced pistoning during dorsiflexion. Range of motion was reduced in all orthotic conditions compared to the shod condition. Proximal-distal shifts had minimal biomechanical impact but increased pistoning. Contrary to expectations, neutral alignment due to the recommendations of the manufacturer did not consistently minimize pistoning or preserve motion.
Interpretation
This study underscores the importance of anterior-posterior alignment in optimizing ankle joint function with orthotics. Specifically, anterior alignment reduced pistoning more effectively than the manufacturer-recommended neutral position, particularly during dorsiflexion. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of aligning the orthotic axis with natural joint mechanics, which can reduce motion restrictions, improve gait efficiency, and prevent harmful pressures that may cause discomfort, bruising, and inflammation around the ankle.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.