功能性腘窝角试验可以检测腘绳肌痉挛的特征

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mahdieh Hajibozorgi , Juha M. Hijmans , Christian Greve
{"title":"功能性腘窝角试验可以检测腘绳肌痉挛的特征","authors":"Mahdieh Hajibozorgi ,&nbsp;Juha M. Hijmans ,&nbsp;Christian Greve","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hamstring spasticity is a common impairment in patients with central neurological lesions, and accurate diagnostics is crucial for effective treatment of associated gait abnormalities, such as crouch gait. Current diagnostics, including 3D clinical gait analysis during normal and fast walking, have limitations that may lead to misdiagnosis, possibly explaining the current poor treatment outcomes. To address these limitations, we introduced the functional popliteal angle test—a knee-extension motion with flexed-hip performed while standing on one leg at both slow and fast speeds. This study aimed to assess this test's construct validity, showing its capacity to detect features of hamstring spasticity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Kinematics and hamstring EMG data from patients with central neurological lesions and healthy participants were retrospectively extracted. Two criteria—<em>EMG-Velocity</em> and <em>Peak Muscle Length</em> ratios—were defined to capture key spasticity components: a disproportionately large increase in muscle activity with higher muscle-tendon lengthening velocities and a shorter maximum muscle length during fast vs. slow lengthening. Ratios were calculated individually for patients' and healthy participants' limbs, with values above <em>one</em> indicating spasticity.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Eight out of nine healthy limbs scored below <em>one</em> on both criteria. Among 35 patient limbs (age: 16 ± 12 years), 18 scored below <em>one</em> on both criteria (categorized as non-spastic), while 14 scored above <em>one</em> on both criteria (categorized as spastic). Discrepancies arose in three limbs.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The results suggest that the functional popliteal angle test can detect features of hamstring spasticity and holds potential for enhancing clinical diagnostics of hamstring spasticity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 106523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The functional popliteal angle test can detect features of hamstring spasticity\",\"authors\":\"Mahdieh Hajibozorgi ,&nbsp;Juha M. Hijmans ,&nbsp;Christian Greve\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hamstring spasticity is a common impairment in patients with central neurological lesions, and accurate diagnostics is crucial for effective treatment of associated gait abnormalities, such as crouch gait. Current diagnostics, including 3D clinical gait analysis during normal and fast walking, have limitations that may lead to misdiagnosis, possibly explaining the current poor treatment outcomes. To address these limitations, we introduced the functional popliteal angle test—a knee-extension motion with flexed-hip performed while standing on one leg at both slow and fast speeds. This study aimed to assess this test's construct validity, showing its capacity to detect features of hamstring spasticity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Kinematics and hamstring EMG data from patients with central neurological lesions and healthy participants were retrospectively extracted. Two criteria—<em>EMG-Velocity</em> and <em>Peak Muscle Length</em> ratios—were defined to capture key spasticity components: a disproportionately large increase in muscle activity with higher muscle-tendon lengthening velocities and a shorter maximum muscle length during fast vs. slow lengthening. Ratios were calculated individually for patients' and healthy participants' limbs, with values above <em>one</em> indicating spasticity.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Eight out of nine healthy limbs scored below <em>one</em> on both criteria. Among 35 patient limbs (age: 16 ± 12 years), 18 scored below <em>one</em> on both criteria (categorized as non-spastic), while 14 scored above <em>one</em> on both criteria (categorized as spastic). Discrepancies arose in three limbs.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The results suggest that the functional popliteal angle test can detect features of hamstring spasticity and holds potential for enhancing clinical diagnostics of hamstring spasticity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景腘绳肌痉挛是中枢神经病变患者的常见损伤,准确的诊断对于有效治疗相关步态异常(如蹲踞步态)至关重要。目前的诊断方法(包括正常行走和快速行走时的三维临床步态分析)存在局限性,可能会导致误诊,这可能是目前治疗效果不佳的原因。为了解决这些局限性,我们引入了功能性腘绳肌角度测试--在单腿站立时以慢速和快速进行屈髋伸膝运动。本研究旨在评估该测试的结构效度,显示其检测腘绳肌痉挛特征的能力。方法回顾性提取中枢神经病变患者和健康参与者的运动学和腘绳肌肌电图数据。定义了两个标准--EMG-速度和峰值肌肉长度比,以捕捉关键的痉挛成分:肌肉-肌腱拉长速度越高,肌肉活动增加的比例越大;快速拉长与慢速拉长相比,最大肌肉长度越短。分别计算患者肢体和健康参与者肢体的比率,数值高于 1 表示痉挛。在 35 个患者肢体(年龄:16 ± 12 岁)中,18 个肢体在两个标准上的得分均低于 1(归类为非痉挛型),14 个肢体在两个标准上的得分均高于 1(归类为痉挛型)。结果表明,功能性腘绳肌角度测试可以检测出腿筋痉挛的特征,并有望提高腿筋痉挛的临床诊断水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The functional popliteal angle test can detect features of hamstring spasticity

Background

Hamstring spasticity is a common impairment in patients with central neurological lesions, and accurate diagnostics is crucial for effective treatment of associated gait abnormalities, such as crouch gait. Current diagnostics, including 3D clinical gait analysis during normal and fast walking, have limitations that may lead to misdiagnosis, possibly explaining the current poor treatment outcomes. To address these limitations, we introduced the functional popliteal angle test—a knee-extension motion with flexed-hip performed while standing on one leg at both slow and fast speeds. This study aimed to assess this test's construct validity, showing its capacity to detect features of hamstring spasticity.

Methods

Kinematics and hamstring EMG data from patients with central neurological lesions and healthy participants were retrospectively extracted. Two criteria—EMG-Velocity and Peak Muscle Length ratios—were defined to capture key spasticity components: a disproportionately large increase in muscle activity with higher muscle-tendon lengthening velocities and a shorter maximum muscle length during fast vs. slow lengthening. Ratios were calculated individually for patients' and healthy participants' limbs, with values above one indicating spasticity.

Findings

Eight out of nine healthy limbs scored below one on both criteria. Among 35 patient limbs (age: 16 ± 12 years), 18 scored below one on both criteria (categorized as non-spastic), while 14 scored above one on both criteria (categorized as spastic). Discrepancies arose in three limbs.

Interpretation

The results suggest that the functional popliteal angle test can detect features of hamstring spasticity and holds potential for enhancing clinical diagnostics of hamstring spasticity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信