Michael D. Squire , Victor Cabrera , Eric Christiansen , Alan Jenkin , Kevin Hoffman , Quincy McKown , Peter Parker , Glenn Peterson , Bruno Victorino Sarli , William Schonberg , Katie Steward , Brian Tulaba , Joel Williamsen
{"title":"火星样品返回地球进入系统的微流星体和轨道碎片风险不确定性分析","authors":"Michael D. Squire , Victor Cabrera , Eric Christiansen , Alan Jenkin , Kevin Hoffman , Quincy McKown , Peter Parker , Glenn Peterson , Bruno Victorino Sarli , William Schonberg , Katie Steward , Brian Tulaba , Joel Williamsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spacecraft designers and operators use micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk assessments to predict the probability that an MMOD particle impact will cause a critical failure to their systems. An important aspect of MMOD risk and associated requirements is the treatment of uncertainty, often difficult to quantify or even estimate for many elements of MMOD risk. There are several sources of uncertainty in every MMOD risk assessment, and previous analyses have addressed some, at least from a qualitative standpoint. This paper describes recent efforts to estimate MMOD risk uncertainty due to uncertainties in inputs to the MMOD risk assessment process for a portion of the planned Mars Sample Return campaign.</div><div>The paper explores how sources of uncertainty for the meteoroid environment model and ballistic limit equations were estimated and how applying those uncertainty bounds influenced MMOD risk. Uncertainty bounds for the meteoroid environment were defined by estimating upper and lower bounds for meteoroid flux as a function of heliocentric distance, given by the Meteoroid Engineering Model version 3. Ballistic limit equation uncertainty bounds were given as a percentage increase or decrease in impacting-particle critical diameter. The results demonstrate the relative effect each input source uncertainty had on the overall risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 105362"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mars sample return earth entry system micrometeoroid and orbital debris risk uncertainty analysis\",\"authors\":\"Michael D. Squire , Victor Cabrera , Eric Christiansen , Alan Jenkin , Kevin Hoffman , Quincy McKown , Peter Parker , Glenn Peterson , Bruno Victorino Sarli , William Schonberg , Katie Steward , Brian Tulaba , Joel Williamsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Spacecraft designers and operators use micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk assessments to predict the probability that an MMOD particle impact will cause a critical failure to their systems. An important aspect of MMOD risk and associated requirements is the treatment of uncertainty, often difficult to quantify or even estimate for many elements of MMOD risk. There are several sources of uncertainty in every MMOD risk assessment, and previous analyses have addressed some, at least from a qualitative standpoint. This paper describes recent efforts to estimate MMOD risk uncertainty due to uncertainties in inputs to the MMOD risk assessment process for a portion of the planned Mars Sample Return campaign.</div><div>The paper explores how sources of uncertainty for the meteoroid environment model and ballistic limit equations were estimated and how applying those uncertainty bounds influenced MMOD risk. Uncertainty bounds for the meteoroid environment were defined by estimating upper and lower bounds for meteoroid flux as a function of heliocentric distance, given by the Meteoroid Engineering Model version 3. Ballistic limit equation uncertainty bounds were given as a percentage increase or decrease in impacting-particle critical diameter. The results demonstrate the relative effect each input source uncertainty had on the overall risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25001435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25001435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mars sample return earth entry system micrometeoroid and orbital debris risk uncertainty analysis
Spacecraft designers and operators use micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk assessments to predict the probability that an MMOD particle impact will cause a critical failure to their systems. An important aspect of MMOD risk and associated requirements is the treatment of uncertainty, often difficult to quantify or even estimate for many elements of MMOD risk. There are several sources of uncertainty in every MMOD risk assessment, and previous analyses have addressed some, at least from a qualitative standpoint. This paper describes recent efforts to estimate MMOD risk uncertainty due to uncertainties in inputs to the MMOD risk assessment process for a portion of the planned Mars Sample Return campaign.
The paper explores how sources of uncertainty for the meteoroid environment model and ballistic limit equations were estimated and how applying those uncertainty bounds influenced MMOD risk. Uncertainty bounds for the meteoroid environment were defined by estimating upper and lower bounds for meteoroid flux as a function of heliocentric distance, given by the Meteoroid Engineering Model version 3. Ballistic limit equation uncertainty bounds were given as a percentage increase or decrease in impacting-particle critical diameter. The results demonstrate the relative effect each input source uncertainty had on the overall risk.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them:
-Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading
-Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading
-Terminal ballistics
-Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture
-Stress waves
-Structural crashworthiness
-High-rate mechanical and forming processes
-Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications