压力心态预测了女性对压力和饮食行为的心理生理反应,并调节了压力-饮食关系

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Rebecca R. Klatzkin , Zaynah Ward , Ellie Parker , Eleanor Gilstrap , Aadhya Arkalgud , Alexandra D. Babij , Jacquelyn Pence , Richard J. Bloomer
{"title":"压力心态预测了女性对压力和饮食行为的心理生理反应,并调节了压力-饮食关系","authors":"Rebecca R. Klatzkin ,&nbsp;Zaynah Ward ,&nbsp;Ellie Parker ,&nbsp;Eleanor Gilstrap ,&nbsp;Aadhya Arkalgud ,&nbsp;Alexandra D. Babij ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Pence ,&nbsp;Richard J. Bloomer","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals tend to shift their preferences towards comfort foods following acute stressors, but do not ubiquitously increase the amount of food consumed. Many individuals overeat in response to stressors, yet others decrease or do not change their food intake. Individual differences in factors related to stress and eating, such as stress mindset (i.e., perceptions regarding the nature of stress), may explain this variability in stress-eating. To investigate, we conducted the present pre-registered study, where we investigated whether stress mindset, 1) predicted psychophysiological stress responses, 2) predicted snack intake post-stress, and 3) moderated the stress-eating relationship. Participants were 86 women (34 % non-White) between 18 and 22 years old, with a mean body mass index of 24 kg/m<sup>2,</sup> who completed two visits. Participants completed an assessment of stress mindset during a preliminary screening and, on a subsequent laboratory visit, underwent a stress mindset manipulation followed by an acute social stress task (i.e., TSST) and a snack food taste test. Greater stress-is-enhancing mindsets during screening predicted more adaptive stress responses (greater ratio of sympathetic markers to cortisol levels) and healthier post-stress eating behaviors. Furthermore, the moderation model (PROCESS model 1) was significant: greater post-stress negative affect was associated with more M&amp;M intake only for women with greater stress-is-debilitating mindsets at screening, and greater heart rate was associated with less chip and veggie straw intake only for women with greater stress-is-enhancing mindsets at screening. Thus, stronger stress-is-enhancing mindsets may reduce the impact of psychophysiological stress responses on snack food intake for women. Replications in larger and more diverse samples may elucidate the mechanisms underlying the moderation and inform eating- and obesity-related treatments targeting stress mindset.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"296 ","pages":"Article 114910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress mindset predicts psychophysiological responses to stress and eating behaviors and moderates the stress-eating relationship in women\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca R. Klatzkin ,&nbsp;Zaynah Ward ,&nbsp;Ellie Parker ,&nbsp;Eleanor Gilstrap ,&nbsp;Aadhya Arkalgud ,&nbsp;Alexandra D. Babij ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Pence ,&nbsp;Richard J. Bloomer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Individuals tend to shift their preferences towards comfort foods following acute stressors, but do not ubiquitously increase the amount of food consumed. Many individuals overeat in response to stressors, yet others decrease or do not change their food intake. Individual differences in factors related to stress and eating, such as stress mindset (i.e., perceptions regarding the nature of stress), may explain this variability in stress-eating. To investigate, we conducted the present pre-registered study, where we investigated whether stress mindset, 1) predicted psychophysiological stress responses, 2) predicted snack intake post-stress, and 3) moderated the stress-eating relationship. Participants were 86 women (34 % non-White) between 18 and 22 years old, with a mean body mass index of 24 kg/m<sup>2,</sup> who completed two visits. Participants completed an assessment of stress mindset during a preliminary screening and, on a subsequent laboratory visit, underwent a stress mindset manipulation followed by an acute social stress task (i.e., TSST) and a snack food taste test. Greater stress-is-enhancing mindsets during screening predicted more adaptive stress responses (greater ratio of sympathetic markers to cortisol levels) and healthier post-stress eating behaviors. Furthermore, the moderation model (PROCESS model 1) was significant: greater post-stress negative affect was associated with more M&amp;M intake only for women with greater stress-is-debilitating mindsets at screening, and greater heart rate was associated with less chip and veggie straw intake only for women with greater stress-is-enhancing mindsets at screening. Thus, stronger stress-is-enhancing mindsets may reduce the impact of psychophysiological stress responses on snack food intake for women. Replications in larger and more diverse samples may elucidate the mechanisms underlying the moderation and inform eating- and obesity-related treatments targeting stress mindset.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"296 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425001118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425001118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个体倾向于在急性压力刺激后转向安慰性食物,但不会普遍增加食物消耗量。许多人在面对压力时暴饮暴食,而另一些人则减少或不改变他们的食物摄入量。与压力和饮食相关因素的个体差异,如压力心态(即对压力本质的看法),可以解释压力饮食的这种差异。为此,我们进行了一项预登记研究,研究了压力心态是否能预测心理生理应激反应,2)预测应激后零食摄入量,以及3)调节应激饮食关系。参与者是86名女性(34%非白人),年龄在18至22岁之间,平均体重指数为24 kg/m2,完成了两次访问。参与者在初步筛选期间完成了压力心态评估,在随后的实验室访问中,进行了压力心态操纵,随后进行了急性社会压力任务(即TSST)和零食口味测试。在筛选过程中,更大的压力增强心态预示着更多的适应性压力反应(交感神经标记物与皮质醇水平的比例更高)和更健康的压力后饮食行为。此外,调节模型(PROCESS模型1)是显著的:更大的压力后负面影响与更多的M&;M摄入量有关,仅在筛查时具有更大的压力削弱心态的女性中,而心率更高的女性仅在筛查时具有更大的压力增强心态的女性中,与更少的薯条和蔬菜吸管摄入量有关。因此,更强的压力增强心态可能会减少心理生理压力反应对女性零食摄入量的影响。在更大、更多样化的样本中进行的重复研究可能阐明了调节的机制,并为针对压力心态的饮食和肥胖相关治疗提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress mindset predicts psychophysiological responses to stress and eating behaviors and moderates the stress-eating relationship in women
Individuals tend to shift their preferences towards comfort foods following acute stressors, but do not ubiquitously increase the amount of food consumed. Many individuals overeat in response to stressors, yet others decrease or do not change their food intake. Individual differences in factors related to stress and eating, such as stress mindset (i.e., perceptions regarding the nature of stress), may explain this variability in stress-eating. To investigate, we conducted the present pre-registered study, where we investigated whether stress mindset, 1) predicted psychophysiological stress responses, 2) predicted snack intake post-stress, and 3) moderated the stress-eating relationship. Participants were 86 women (34 % non-White) between 18 and 22 years old, with a mean body mass index of 24 kg/m2, who completed two visits. Participants completed an assessment of stress mindset during a preliminary screening and, on a subsequent laboratory visit, underwent a stress mindset manipulation followed by an acute social stress task (i.e., TSST) and a snack food taste test. Greater stress-is-enhancing mindsets during screening predicted more adaptive stress responses (greater ratio of sympathetic markers to cortisol levels) and healthier post-stress eating behaviors. Furthermore, the moderation model (PROCESS model 1) was significant: greater post-stress negative affect was associated with more M&M intake only for women with greater stress-is-debilitating mindsets at screening, and greater heart rate was associated with less chip and veggie straw intake only for women with greater stress-is-enhancing mindsets at screening. Thus, stronger stress-is-enhancing mindsets may reduce the impact of psychophysiological stress responses on snack food intake for women. Replications in larger and more diverse samples may elucidate the mechanisms underlying the moderation and inform eating- and obesity-related treatments targeting stress mindset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信