对比增强超声微泡摄取和血浆生物标志物异常可见于腹主动脉瘤患者

Q3 Medicine
Adham N. Abou Ali MD , Patrick Cherfan MD , Ashraf G. Taha MD , Michel S. Makaroun MD , Yingze Zhang PhD , Xucai X. Chen PhD , Flordeliza S. Villanueva MD , Rabih A. Chaer MD
{"title":"对比增强超声微泡摄取和血浆生物标志物异常可见于腹主动脉瘤患者","authors":"Adham N. Abou Ali MD ,&nbsp;Patrick Cherfan MD ,&nbsp;Ashraf G. Taha MD ,&nbsp;Michel S. Makaroun MD ,&nbsp;Yingze Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Xucai X. Chen PhD ,&nbsp;Flordeliza S. Villanueva MD ,&nbsp;Rabih A. Chaer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvssci.2025.100284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth is unpredictable. We hypothesize that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and plasma inflammatory biomarkers (PIBs) may detect AAA wall inflammation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with an AAA diameter ≥4 cm had CEUS and PIB testing at enrollment and every 6 months. Microbubble replenishment was analyzed via manually drawn regions of the aortic wall. Aneurysm growth, rupture, and repair were recorded. PIB testing was analyzed using biomarker panels. Independent and paired <em>t</em>-tests were used to detect differences in PIB levels. Logistic regression was used to study the association between PIBs, microbubble uptake, and AAA growth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 59 patients were enrolled (mean age, 68.8 ± 8.6 years; 13.6% female; 93.2% White). Mean AAA size on presentation was 41.6 ± 6.7 mm. Microbubble uptake was seen in 36 patients (61%). Patients with AAA had high baseline levels of Cystatin C and interferon-γ and low levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Microbubble uptake was seen in 59% of patients with ≥5 mm AAA growth but was not predictive of growth on logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We have demonstrated that microbubble uptake with CEUS is seen in the aortic wall/intraluminal thrombus of patients with AAA. CEUS and PIBs could provide insight into aneurysm behavior in newly diagnosed AAA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74035,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular science","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-enhanced ultrasound microbubble uptake and abnormal plasma biomarkers are seen in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms\",\"authors\":\"Adham N. Abou Ali MD ,&nbsp;Patrick Cherfan MD ,&nbsp;Ashraf G. Taha MD ,&nbsp;Michel S. Makaroun MD ,&nbsp;Yingze Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Xucai X. Chen PhD ,&nbsp;Flordeliza S. Villanueva MD ,&nbsp;Rabih A. Chaer MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvssci.2025.100284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth is unpredictable. We hypothesize that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and plasma inflammatory biomarkers (PIBs) may detect AAA wall inflammation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with an AAA diameter ≥4 cm had CEUS and PIB testing at enrollment and every 6 months. Microbubble replenishment was analyzed via manually drawn regions of the aortic wall. Aneurysm growth, rupture, and repair were recorded. PIB testing was analyzed using biomarker panels. Independent and paired <em>t</em>-tests were used to detect differences in PIB levels. Logistic regression was used to study the association between PIBs, microbubble uptake, and AAA growth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 59 patients were enrolled (mean age, 68.8 ± 8.6 years; 13.6% female; 93.2% White). Mean AAA size on presentation was 41.6 ± 6.7 mm. Microbubble uptake was seen in 36 patients (61%). Patients with AAA had high baseline levels of Cystatin C and interferon-γ and low levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Microbubble uptake was seen in 59% of patients with ≥5 mm AAA growth but was not predictive of growth on logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We have demonstrated that microbubble uptake with CEUS is seen in the aortic wall/intraluminal thrombus of patients with AAA. CEUS and PIBs could provide insight into aneurysm behavior in newly diagnosed AAA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350325000057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350325000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的生长是不可预测的。我们假设对比增强超声(CEUS)成像和血浆炎症生物标志物(PIBs)可以检测AAA壁炎症。方法AAA直径≥4 cm的患者在入组时和每6个月进行超声造影和PIB检查。通过人工绘制主动脉壁区域分析微泡补充。记录动脉瘤生长、破裂和修复情况。使用生物标志物面板分析PIB检测。采用独立和配对t检验来检测PIB水平的差异。采用Logistic回归研究PIBs、微泡摄取和AAA生长之间的关系。结果共入组59例患者,平均年龄68.8±8.6岁;13.6%的女性;93.2%的白人)。就诊时平均AAA大小为41.6±6.7 mm。36例患者(61%)出现微泡摄取。AAA患者的胱抑素C和干扰素-γ基线水平较高,巨噬细胞迁移抑制因子水平较低。微泡摄取在≥5mm AAA生长的患者中出现59%,但在logistic回归中不能预测生长。结论超声造影在AAA患者的主动脉壁/腔内血栓中可见微泡摄取,超声造影和PIBs可以为新诊断的AAA患者提供动脉瘤行为的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound microbubble uptake and abnormal plasma biomarkers are seen in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth is unpredictable. We hypothesize that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and plasma inflammatory biomarkers (PIBs) may detect AAA wall inflammation.

Methods

Patients with an AAA diameter ≥4 cm had CEUS and PIB testing at enrollment and every 6 months. Microbubble replenishment was analyzed via manually drawn regions of the aortic wall. Aneurysm growth, rupture, and repair were recorded. PIB testing was analyzed using biomarker panels. Independent and paired t-tests were used to detect differences in PIB levels. Logistic regression was used to study the association between PIBs, microbubble uptake, and AAA growth.

Results

A total of 59 patients were enrolled (mean age, 68.8 ± 8.6 years; 13.6% female; 93.2% White). Mean AAA size on presentation was 41.6 ± 6.7 mm. Microbubble uptake was seen in 36 patients (61%). Patients with AAA had high baseline levels of Cystatin C and interferon-γ and low levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Microbubble uptake was seen in 59% of patients with ≥5 mm AAA growth but was not predictive of growth on logistic regression.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that microbubble uptake with CEUS is seen in the aortic wall/intraluminal thrombus of patients with AAA. CEUS and PIBs could provide insight into aneurysm behavior in newly diagnosed AAA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信