类星体x射线和紫外光度关系的红移演化:来自Ia型超新星的校准结果

Xiaolei Li, Ryan E. Keeley and Arman Shafieloo
{"title":"类星体x射线和紫外光度关系的红移演化:来自Ia型超新星的校准结果","authors":"Xiaolei Li, Ryan E. Keeley and Arman Shafieloo","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quasars could serve as standard candles if the relation between their ultraviolet (UV) and X-ray luminosities can be accurately calibrated. Previously, we developed a model-independent method to calibrate quasar standard candles using the distance–redshift relation reconstructed from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at z < 2 using Gaussian process regression. Interestingly, we found that the calibrated quasar standard candle data set preferred a deviation from ΛCDM at redshifts above z > 2. One possible interpretation of these findings is that the calibration parameters of the quasar UV and X-ray luminosity relationship evolves with redshift. In order to test the redshift dependence of the quasar calibration in a model-independent manner, we divided the quasar sample whose redshift overlaps with the redshift coverage of Pantheon+ SNe Ia compilation into two subsamples: a low-redshift quasar subsample and a high-redshift quasar subsample. Assuming all the quasar samples are reliable, our results show that there is about a 4σ inconsistency between the quasar parameters inferred from the subsamples without considering evolution. This inconsistency suggests the possibility of considering redshift evolution for the relationship between the quasars’ UV and X-ray luminosities. We then test an explicit parameterization of the redshift evolution of the quasar calibration parameters via γ(z) = γ0 + γ1(1 + z) and β(z) = β0 + β1(1 + z). Combining this redshift-dependent calibration relationship with the distance–redshift relationship reconstructed from the Pantheon+ supernova compilation, we find the high-redshift subsample and low-redshift subsample become consistent at the 2σ level, which means that the parameterized form of γ(z) and β(z) works well at describing the evolution of the quasar calibration parameters.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redshift Evolution of the X-Ray and Ultraviolet Luminosity Relation of Quasars: Calibrated Results from SNe Ia\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolei Li, Ryan E. Keeley and Arman Shafieloo\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fe\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quasars could serve as standard candles if the relation between their ultraviolet (UV) and X-ray luminosities can be accurately calibrated. Previously, we developed a model-independent method to calibrate quasar standard candles using the distance–redshift relation reconstructed from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at z < 2 using Gaussian process regression. Interestingly, we found that the calibrated quasar standard candle data set preferred a deviation from ΛCDM at redshifts above z > 2. One possible interpretation of these findings is that the calibration parameters of the quasar UV and X-ray luminosity relationship evolves with redshift. In order to test the redshift dependence of the quasar calibration in a model-independent manner, we divided the quasar sample whose redshift overlaps with the redshift coverage of Pantheon+ SNe Ia compilation into two subsamples: a low-redshift quasar subsample and a high-redshift quasar subsample. Assuming all the quasar samples are reliable, our results show that there is about a 4σ inconsistency between the quasar parameters inferred from the subsamples without considering evolution. This inconsistency suggests the possibility of considering redshift evolution for the relationship between the quasars’ UV and X-ray luminosities. We then test an explicit parameterization of the redshift evolution of the quasar calibration parameters via γ(z) = γ0 + γ1(1 + z) and β(z) = β0 + β1(1 + z). Combining this redshift-dependent calibration relationship with the distance–redshift relationship reconstructed from the Pantheon+ supernova compilation, we find the high-redshift subsample and low-redshift subsample become consistent at the 2σ level, which means that the parameterized form of γ(z) and β(z) works well at describing the evolution of the quasar calibration parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fe\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fe","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果类星体的紫外线(UV)和x射线亮度之间的关系可以精确校准,类星体可以作为标准蜡烛。在此之前,我们开发了一种独立于模型的方法来校准类星体标准烛光,该方法使用高斯过程回归,利用Ia型超新星(SNe Ia)在z < 2处重建的距离-红移关系来校准类星体标准烛光。有趣的是,我们发现经过校准的类星体标准烛光数据集在z >2以上的红移处倾向于偏离ΛCDM。对这些发现的一种可能解释是类星体紫外和x射线光度关系的校准参数随着红移而演变。为了以模型无关的方式检验类星体校准的红移依赖性,我们将红移与Pantheon+ SNe Ia编译的红移覆盖范围重叠的类星体样本分为两个子样本:低红移类星体子样本和高红移类星体子样本。假设所有类星体样本都是可靠的,我们的结果表明,在不考虑演化的情况下,从子样本推断的类星体参数之间存在约4σ的不一致性。这种不一致暗示了考虑类星体紫外和x射线光度之间关系的红移演化的可能性。然后,我们通过γ(z) = γ0 + γ1(1 + z)和β(z) = β0 + β1(1 + z)对类星体标定参数的红移演化进行了显式参数化测试。将这种红移依赖的标定关系与从万神殿+超新星编辑中重建的距离-红移关系相结合,我们发现高红移子样本和低红移子样本在2σ水平上是一致的。这意味着γ(z)和β(z)的参数化形式可以很好地描述类星体校准参数的演化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redshift Evolution of the X-Ray and Ultraviolet Luminosity Relation of Quasars: Calibrated Results from SNe Ia
Quasars could serve as standard candles if the relation between their ultraviolet (UV) and X-ray luminosities can be accurately calibrated. Previously, we developed a model-independent method to calibrate quasar standard candles using the distance–redshift relation reconstructed from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at z < 2 using Gaussian process regression. Interestingly, we found that the calibrated quasar standard candle data set preferred a deviation from ΛCDM at redshifts above z > 2. One possible interpretation of these findings is that the calibration parameters of the quasar UV and X-ray luminosity relationship evolves with redshift. In order to test the redshift dependence of the quasar calibration in a model-independent manner, we divided the quasar sample whose redshift overlaps with the redshift coverage of Pantheon+ SNe Ia compilation into two subsamples: a low-redshift quasar subsample and a high-redshift quasar subsample. Assuming all the quasar samples are reliable, our results show that there is about a 4σ inconsistency between the quasar parameters inferred from the subsamples without considering evolution. This inconsistency suggests the possibility of considering redshift evolution for the relationship between the quasars’ UV and X-ray luminosities. We then test an explicit parameterization of the redshift evolution of the quasar calibration parameters via γ(z) = γ0 + γ1(1 + z) and β(z) = β0 + β1(1 + z). Combining this redshift-dependent calibration relationship with the distance–redshift relationship reconstructed from the Pantheon+ supernova compilation, we find the high-redshift subsample and low-redshift subsample become consistent at the 2σ level, which means that the parameterized form of γ(z) and β(z) works well at describing the evolution of the quasar calibration parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信