用密集的纵向数据更新患者的感知,以增强病例概念化:贝叶斯信息先验的方法。

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Saskia Scholten,Lars Klintwall,Julia Anna Glombiewski,Julian Burger
{"title":"用密集的纵向数据更新患者的感知,以增强病例概念化:贝叶斯信息先验的方法。","authors":"Saskia Scholten,Lars Klintwall,Julia Anna Glombiewski,Julian Burger","doi":"10.1037/abn0000993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing the persistent heterogeneity in psychopathology, treatment outcomes, and the science-practice gap requires a systematic approach to personalizing psychotherapy. Case conceptualization seeks to understand a patient's unique psychopathology by generating and continuously updating hypotheses about predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining factors. This study introduces a new data-driven method to formalize this process with personalized network estimation, combining prior elicitation and Bayesian inference. It is the first to test its clinical usefulness with 12 patients, primarily treated for depression, and their therapists (preregistered and can be found as the additional online materials: https://osf.io/38qdx). Patients employed the Perceived Causal Networks method to create personalized \"prior networks,\" mapping how they perceived their symptoms to interact. Bayesian inference was used to update these prior networks using longitudinal data collected subsequently 6 times daily over 15 days (N = 935), resulting in personalized \"posterior networks.\" Both Perceived Causal Networks and longitudinal assessments were evaluated as feasible and acceptable. Face validity was scored highest for the posterior networks. Patients emphasized the personal relevance of these networks, while therapists noted their value in guiding the therapeutic process. However, prior, posterior, and data networks showed significant dissimilarities. These differences may stem from patients' limited insight into symptom interactions, insufficient power in the longitudinal data, or variations in self-perception. Despite some inconsistencies, the study shows potential for combining two methods to create personalized models of psychopathology, highlighting the need for future research to refine this formalization process into a more rigorous theoretical-empirical cycle to test these models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updating patient perceptions with intensive longitudinal data for enhanced case conceptualizations: An approach with Bayesian informative priors.\",\"authors\":\"Saskia Scholten,Lars Klintwall,Julia Anna Glombiewski,Julian Burger\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0000993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Addressing the persistent heterogeneity in psychopathology, treatment outcomes, and the science-practice gap requires a systematic approach to personalizing psychotherapy. Case conceptualization seeks to understand a patient's unique psychopathology by generating and continuously updating hypotheses about predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining factors. This study introduces a new data-driven method to formalize this process with personalized network estimation, combining prior elicitation and Bayesian inference. It is the first to test its clinical usefulness with 12 patients, primarily treated for depression, and their therapists (preregistered and can be found as the additional online materials: https://osf.io/38qdx). Patients employed the Perceived Causal Networks method to create personalized \\\"prior networks,\\\" mapping how they perceived their symptoms to interact. Bayesian inference was used to update these prior networks using longitudinal data collected subsequently 6 times daily over 15 days (N = 935), resulting in personalized \\\"posterior networks.\\\" Both Perceived Causal Networks and longitudinal assessments were evaluated as feasible and acceptable. Face validity was scored highest for the posterior networks. Patients emphasized the personal relevance of these networks, while therapists noted their value in guiding the therapeutic process. However, prior, posterior, and data networks showed significant dissimilarities. These differences may stem from patients' limited insight into symptom interactions, insufficient power in the longitudinal data, or variations in self-perception. Despite some inconsistencies, the study shows potential for combining two methods to create personalized models of psychopathology, highlighting the need for future research to refine this formalization process into a more rigorous theoretical-empirical cycle to test these models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解决精神病理学、治疗结果和科学实践差距的持续异质性需要一种系统的个性化心理治疗方法。病例概念化试图通过产生和不断更新关于易感因素、促发因素和维持因素的假设来理解患者独特的精神病理。本研究引入了一种新的数据驱动方法,结合先验启发和贝叶斯推理,通过个性化的网络估计来形式化这一过程。这是第一个在12名主要接受抑郁症治疗的患者和他们的治疗师(预先注册,可以作为额外的在线材料:https://osf.io/38qdx)身上测试其临床有效性的公司。患者使用感知因果网络方法来创建个性化的“先前网络”,绘制他们如何感知他们的症状相互作用的图。贝叶斯推断使用随后在15天内每天收集6次的纵向数据来更新这些先验网络(N = 935),从而产生个性化的“后验网络”。感知因果网络和纵向评估都被评估为可行和可接受的。后验网络的面部效度得分最高。患者强调这些网络的个人相关性,而治疗师注意到它们在指导治疗过程中的价值。然而,先验、后验和数据网络显示出显著的差异。这些差异可能源于患者对症状相互作用的了解有限,纵向数据的力量不足,或自我认知的变化。尽管存在一些不一致之处,但该研究显示了将两种方法结合起来创建个性化精神病理学模型的潜力,强调了未来研究将这种形式化过程细化为更严格的理论-经验循环来测试这些模型的必要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updating patient perceptions with intensive longitudinal data for enhanced case conceptualizations: An approach with Bayesian informative priors.
Addressing the persistent heterogeneity in psychopathology, treatment outcomes, and the science-practice gap requires a systematic approach to personalizing psychotherapy. Case conceptualization seeks to understand a patient's unique psychopathology by generating and continuously updating hypotheses about predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining factors. This study introduces a new data-driven method to formalize this process with personalized network estimation, combining prior elicitation and Bayesian inference. It is the first to test its clinical usefulness with 12 patients, primarily treated for depression, and their therapists (preregistered and can be found as the additional online materials: https://osf.io/38qdx). Patients employed the Perceived Causal Networks method to create personalized "prior networks," mapping how they perceived their symptoms to interact. Bayesian inference was used to update these prior networks using longitudinal data collected subsequently 6 times daily over 15 days (N = 935), resulting in personalized "posterior networks." Both Perceived Causal Networks and longitudinal assessments were evaluated as feasible and acceptable. Face validity was scored highest for the posterior networks. Patients emphasized the personal relevance of these networks, while therapists noted their value in guiding the therapeutic process. However, prior, posterior, and data networks showed significant dissimilarities. These differences may stem from patients' limited insight into symptom interactions, insufficient power in the longitudinal data, or variations in self-perception. Despite some inconsistencies, the study shows potential for combining two methods to create personalized models of psychopathology, highlighting the need for future research to refine this formalization process into a more rigorous theoretical-empirical cycle to test these models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信