Semra Demir, Müge Olgaç, Osman Ozan Yeğit, İlkim Deniz Toprak, Mehmet Erdem Çakmak, Merve İğde Hormet, Nida Öztop, Pelin Korkmaz, Şule Kamacı Çelik, Deniz Eyice Karabacak, Nevzat Kahveci, Işıl Göğem İmren, Bircan Erden, Raif Coşkun, Pelin Karadağ, Derya Ünal, Aslı Gelincik
{"title":"复发性血管性水肿患者发作期间遗传性血管性水肿的预测:遗传性血管性水肿预测评分的一瞥","authors":"Semra Demir, Müge Olgaç, Osman Ozan Yeğit, İlkim Deniz Toprak, Mehmet Erdem Çakmak, Merve İğde Hormet, Nida Öztop, Pelin Korkmaz, Şule Kamacı Çelik, Deniz Eyice Karabacak, Nevzat Kahveci, Işıl Göğem İmren, Bircan Erden, Raif Coşkun, Pelin Karadağ, Derya Ünal, Aslı Gelincik","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background/Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Misdiagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) leads to inappropriate management of the attacks. A scoring system that anticipates diagnosis can be beneficial for clinicians who are unfamiliar with angioedema. This study aims to develop a practical scoring system for use during acute attacks to predict HAE in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>To predict HAE, nine HAE experts unanimously identified five predictive items (PIs); absence of urticaria, presence of abdominal pain episodes, family history, early onset of attacks and previous unresponsiveness to anti-histaminergic treatments. The researchers questioned 106 patients with HAE and 155 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) about PIs. A score was attributed to each significant PI based on OR values obtained through logistic regression analysis. The cut-off point for the prediction of HAE and its sensitivity and specificity were determined by ROC curve analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In a univariate analysis, all items showed significant differences between HAE and MMAE patients. Regression analysis attributed scores as follows: 23 points for the absence of urticaria, 11 points for the abdominal pain episodes, 9 points for family history, and 53 points for unresponsiveness to antihistaminergic treatments. No score was attributed to early onset of age (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.990, with a total score of ≥38 demonstrating the best sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (96.1%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>HAEps is a valuable tool for diagnosing HAE in patients with RAE. A score of 38 or more indicates the possible presence of HAE with substantial sensitivity and specificity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of hereditary angioedema during attacks in patients with recurrent angioedema: Awareness at a glance with the hereditary angioedema prediction score\",\"authors\":\"Semra Demir, Müge Olgaç, Osman Ozan Yeğit, İlkim Deniz Toprak, Mehmet Erdem Çakmak, Merve İğde Hormet, Nida Öztop, Pelin Korkmaz, Şule Kamacı Çelik, Deniz Eyice Karabacak, Nevzat Kahveci, Işıl Göğem İmren, Bircan Erden, Raif Coşkun, Pelin Karadağ, Derya Ünal, Aslı Gelincik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clt2.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background/Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Misdiagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) leads to inappropriate management of the attacks. A scoring system that anticipates diagnosis can be beneficial for clinicians who are unfamiliar with angioedema. This study aims to develop a practical scoring system for use during acute attacks to predict HAE in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>To predict HAE, nine HAE experts unanimously identified five predictive items (PIs); absence of urticaria, presence of abdominal pain episodes, family history, early onset of attacks and previous unresponsiveness to anti-histaminergic treatments. The researchers questioned 106 patients with HAE and 155 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) about PIs. A score was attributed to each significant PI based on OR values obtained through logistic regression analysis. The cut-off point for the prediction of HAE and its sensitivity and specificity were determined by ROC curve analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a univariate analysis, all items showed significant differences between HAE and MMAE patients. Regression analysis attributed scores as follows: 23 points for the absence of urticaria, 11 points for the abdominal pain episodes, 9 points for family history, and 53 points for unresponsiveness to antihistaminergic treatments. No score was attributed to early onset of age (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.990, with a total score of ≥38 demonstrating the best sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (96.1%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>HAEps is a valuable tool for diagnosing HAE in patients with RAE. A score of 38 or more indicates the possible presence of HAE with substantial sensitivity and specificity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Allergy\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70040\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of hereditary angioedema during attacks in patients with recurrent angioedema: Awareness at a glance with the hereditary angioedema prediction score
Background/Aim
Misdiagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) leads to inappropriate management of the attacks. A scoring system that anticipates diagnosis can be beneficial for clinicians who are unfamiliar with angioedema. This study aims to develop a practical scoring system for use during acute attacks to predict HAE in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE).
Method
To predict HAE, nine HAE experts unanimously identified five predictive items (PIs); absence of urticaria, presence of abdominal pain episodes, family history, early onset of attacks and previous unresponsiveness to anti-histaminergic treatments. The researchers questioned 106 patients with HAE and 155 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) about PIs. A score was attributed to each significant PI based on OR values obtained through logistic regression analysis. The cut-off point for the prediction of HAE and its sensitivity and specificity were determined by ROC curve analysis.
Results
In a univariate analysis, all items showed significant differences between HAE and MMAE patients. Regression analysis attributed scores as follows: 23 points for the absence of urticaria, 11 points for the abdominal pain episodes, 9 points for family history, and 53 points for unresponsiveness to antihistaminergic treatments. No score was attributed to early onset of age (p > 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.990, with a total score of ≥38 demonstrating the best sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (96.1%).
Conclusions
HAEps is a valuable tool for diagnosing HAE in patients with RAE. A score of 38 or more indicates the possible presence of HAE with substantial sensitivity and specificity.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience.
Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.