复发性血管性水肿患者发作期间遗传性血管性水肿的预测:遗传性血管性水肿预测评分的一瞥

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Semra Demir, Müge Olgaç, Osman Ozan Yeğit, İlkim Deniz Toprak, Mehmet Erdem Çakmak, Merve İğde Hormet, Nida Öztop, Pelin Korkmaz, Şule Kamacı Çelik, Deniz Eyice Karabacak, Nevzat Kahveci, Işıl Göğem İmren, Bircan Erden, Raif Coşkun, Pelin Karadağ, Derya Ünal, Aslı Gelincik
{"title":"复发性血管性水肿患者发作期间遗传性血管性水肿的预测:遗传性血管性水肿预测评分的一瞥","authors":"Semra Demir,&nbsp;Müge Olgaç,&nbsp;Osman Ozan Yeğit,&nbsp;İlkim Deniz Toprak,&nbsp;Mehmet Erdem Çakmak,&nbsp;Merve İğde Hormet,&nbsp;Nida Öztop,&nbsp;Pelin Korkmaz,&nbsp;Şule Kamacı Çelik,&nbsp;Deniz Eyice Karabacak,&nbsp;Nevzat Kahveci,&nbsp;Işıl Göğem İmren,&nbsp;Bircan Erden,&nbsp;Raif Coşkun,&nbsp;Pelin Karadağ,&nbsp;Derya Ünal,&nbsp;Aslı Gelincik","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background/Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Misdiagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) leads to inappropriate management of the attacks. A scoring system that anticipates diagnosis can be beneficial for clinicians who are unfamiliar with angioedema. This study aims to develop a practical scoring system for use during acute attacks to predict HAE in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>To predict HAE, nine HAE experts unanimously identified five predictive items (PIs); absence of urticaria, presence of abdominal pain episodes, family history, early onset of attacks and previous unresponsiveness to anti-histaminergic treatments. The researchers questioned 106 patients with HAE and 155 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) about PIs. A score was attributed to each significant PI based on OR values obtained through logistic regression analysis. The cut-off point for the prediction of HAE and its sensitivity and specificity were determined by ROC curve analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In a univariate analysis, all items showed significant differences between HAE and MMAE patients. Regression analysis attributed scores as follows: 23 points for the absence of urticaria, 11 points for the abdominal pain episodes, 9 points for family history, and 53 points for unresponsiveness to antihistaminergic treatments. No score was attributed to early onset of age (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.990, with a total score of ≥38 demonstrating the best sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (96.1%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>HAEps is a valuable tool for diagnosing HAE in patients with RAE. A score of 38 or more indicates the possible presence of HAE with substantial sensitivity and specificity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of hereditary angioedema during attacks in patients with recurrent angioedema: Awareness at a glance with the hereditary angioedema prediction score\",\"authors\":\"Semra Demir,&nbsp;Müge Olgaç,&nbsp;Osman Ozan Yeğit,&nbsp;İlkim Deniz Toprak,&nbsp;Mehmet Erdem Çakmak,&nbsp;Merve İğde Hormet,&nbsp;Nida Öztop,&nbsp;Pelin Korkmaz,&nbsp;Şule Kamacı Çelik,&nbsp;Deniz Eyice Karabacak,&nbsp;Nevzat Kahveci,&nbsp;Işıl Göğem İmren,&nbsp;Bircan Erden,&nbsp;Raif Coşkun,&nbsp;Pelin Karadağ,&nbsp;Derya Ünal,&nbsp;Aslı Gelincik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clt2.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background/Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Misdiagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) leads to inappropriate management of the attacks. A scoring system that anticipates diagnosis can be beneficial for clinicians who are unfamiliar with angioedema. This study aims to develop a practical scoring system for use during acute attacks to predict HAE in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>To predict HAE, nine HAE experts unanimously identified five predictive items (PIs); absence of urticaria, presence of abdominal pain episodes, family history, early onset of attacks and previous unresponsiveness to anti-histaminergic treatments. The researchers questioned 106 patients with HAE and 155 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) about PIs. A score was attributed to each significant PI based on OR values obtained through logistic regression analysis. The cut-off point for the prediction of HAE and its sensitivity and specificity were determined by ROC curve analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a univariate analysis, all items showed significant differences between HAE and MMAE patients. Regression analysis attributed scores as follows: 23 points for the absence of urticaria, 11 points for the abdominal pain episodes, 9 points for family history, and 53 points for unresponsiveness to antihistaminergic treatments. No score was attributed to early onset of age (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.990, with a total score of ≥38 demonstrating the best sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (96.1%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>HAEps is a valuable tool for diagnosing HAE in patients with RAE. A score of 38 or more indicates the possible presence of HAE with substantial sensitivity and specificity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Allergy\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70040\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)的误诊会导致治疗不当。预测诊断的评分系统对不熟悉血管性水肿的临床医生是有益的。本研究旨在开发一种实用的评分系统,用于急性发作期间预测复发性血管性水肿(RAE)患者的HAE。方法预测HAE, 9名HAE专家一致确定5个预测项目(pi);无荨麻疹,腹痛发作,家族史,早发性发作,既往对抗组胺能治疗无反应。研究人员询问了106例HAE患者和155例肥大细胞介导的血管性水肿(MMAE)患者关于pi的问题。根据逻辑回归分析得到的OR值,对每一个显著PI进行评分。预测HAE的分界点及其敏感性和特异性通过ROC曲线分析确定。结果在单变量分析中,所有项目均显示HAE和MMAE患者之间存在显著差异。回归分析将得分归为如下:无荨麻疹23分,腹痛发作11分,家族史9分,抗组胺药治疗无反应53分。没有得分归因于早发年龄(p >;0.05)。ROC分析显示曲线下面积为0.990,总分≥38时灵敏度为96.4%,特异度为96.1%。结论HAEps是诊断RAE患者HAE的有效工具。38分及以上提示可能存在HAE,具有相当的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prediction of hereditary angioedema during attacks in patients with recurrent angioedema: Awareness at a glance with the hereditary angioedema prediction score

Prediction of hereditary angioedema during attacks in patients with recurrent angioedema: Awareness at a glance with the hereditary angioedema prediction score

Background/Aim

Misdiagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) leads to inappropriate management of the attacks. A scoring system that anticipates diagnosis can be beneficial for clinicians who are unfamiliar with angioedema. This study aims to develop a practical scoring system for use during acute attacks to predict HAE in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE).

Method

To predict HAE, nine HAE experts unanimously identified five predictive items (PIs); absence of urticaria, presence of abdominal pain episodes, family history, early onset of attacks and previous unresponsiveness to anti-histaminergic treatments. The researchers questioned 106 patients with HAE and 155 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) about PIs. A score was attributed to each significant PI based on OR values obtained through logistic regression analysis. The cut-off point for the prediction of HAE and its sensitivity and specificity were determined by ROC curve analysis.

Results

In a univariate analysis, all items showed significant differences between HAE and MMAE patients. Regression analysis attributed scores as follows: 23 points for the absence of urticaria, 11 points for the abdominal pain episodes, 9 points for family history, and 53 points for unresponsiveness to antihistaminergic treatments. No score was attributed to early onset of age (p > 0.05). The ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.990, with a total score of ≥38 demonstrating the best sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (96.1%).

Conclusions

HAEps is a valuable tool for diagnosing HAE in patients with RAE. A score of 38 or more indicates the possible presence of HAE with substantial sensitivity and specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信