澳大利亚心理健康状况:跨专业合作倡导公平和资源充足的心理健康护理

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
A. O. Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary, A. M. Kim Usher
{"title":"澳大利亚心理健康状况:跨专业合作倡导公平和资源充足的心理健康护理","authors":"A. O. Debra Jackson,&nbsp;Michelle Cleary,&nbsp;A. M. Kim Usher","doi":"10.1111/inm.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Australia's mental health system is under continuing and unprecedented strain, with growing demand threatening to overwhelm public services. Mental health care is inherently multidisciplinary, requiring strong collaboration among nursing, medicine, and allied health professionals, alongside meaningful and authentic engagement with consumers and carers, to ensure comprehensive and effective support for patients and communities. However, for many years now, mental health services have been under resourced, and there have not been adequate services to meet demand (Roche et al. <span>2018</span>). In 2023, Mental Health Carers NSW Inc., produced a report that said, <i>“The work of past inquiries has made a convincing case that a significant increase in mental health funding is a prerequisite to achieving meaningful change. This key recommendation has been largely ignored and mental health funding as a proportion of overall health funding has remained stagnant for the past two decades</i>.” (p.24).</p><p>The consequences of this prolonged under-resourcing are becoming starkly evident. Frontline healthcare workers characterise the mental health system as overly complicated, difficult to access, occasionally ineffective, and increasingly inequitable. They highlight a system that is poorly funded, disjointed, and not serving its intended purpose (NSW Branch of the Royal Australian New Zealand College of Psychiatrists <span>2023</span>). There are significant workforce shortages across the mental health sector, including acute and chronic shortages of mental health nurses. There is an urgent need to address the critical shortage of mental health nurses, as highlighted by the Productivity Commission, with immediate action required to support and expand the nursing workforce to ensure effective, multidisciplinary mental health care (Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Health and Aged Care) <span>2022</span>). This may mitigate the very real issue of substituting other disciplines, which is occurring across the sector, with limited if any evaluation of such role substitution (Looi et al. <span>2024</span>). General practitioners (GPs) have raised concerns about limited access to equitable and affordable mental health care (The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners <span>2024</span>). Most recently, New South Wales (NSW) has seen a mass resignation of psychiatrists (Gillespie <span>2025</span>; Dias and Donaldson <span>2025</span>). Together, these issues have created a crisis in mental health care. In this editorial, we emphasise the need for health professionals to collaborate in advocating for adequate resourcing of mental health services.</p><p>For decades, mental health services in Australia have been chronically underfunded despite multiple inquiries and reforms. In New South Wales (NSW) the Richmond Report of 1983 proposed closing psychiatric hospitals in favour of well-resourced community health centres, aiming to provide community-based care for people with chronic mental illness rather than simply placing people in institutions. A decade later, the Report of the National Inquiry into the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness was released, which detailed widespread systemic human rights abuses of people affected by mental illness and identified the need for a more concerted action by government (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREORC] <span>1993</span>). Many of the issues highlighted in this Report remain current for people living with mental illness, their carers, and family (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. <span>2019</span>). Although these initiatives helped shape services, drive cultural change, and spark improvements, successive governments have failed to fully implement this vision (Crews <span>2024</span>). Instead, deinstitutionalization was used as a cost-cutting measure, leaving many individuals with serious mental illness without sufficient support. As a result, rather than receiving proper care, many people with serious mental illness ended up in prisons, homeless, or cycling in and out of underfunded and overstretched services (Crews <span>2024</span>). The failure to invest in adequate community-based care has placed enormous strain on the mental health system, leaving vulnerable individuals and families to navigate complex illnesses with little or no support.</p><p>Mental distress in the community has continued to rise, with resourcing for mental health services not keeping pace with need, resulting in considerable disparities in access to mental health services. In Australia, First Nations communities experience high levels of mental health distress, and this distress is compounded by experiencing racism and discrimination in day-to-day life (AIHW <span>undated</span>). Experiences of unfair treatment have been reported in 34% of First Nations People living with an identified mental health issue, compared to &lt; 20% who did not have such a diagnosis (AIHW <span>undated</span>). A recent study reported that 29% of working-age adults in Australia's lowest-income households experience significant mental distress, compared to approximately 11% in the highest-income households (Dawadi et al. <span>2024</span>). In addition, the study highlighted that individuals residing in the most disadvantaged areas receive six times fewer Medicare-subsidised mental health services than those living in wealthier regions, despite being in greater need of access to services (Dawadi et al. <span>2024</span>). What this means is that Australians residing in the most disadvantaged regions experience the greatest mental health challenges but have limited access to mental health care services (Dawadi et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Mental health nurses (MHN) numbers are not high enough currently to meet workforce demand, with identified shortfalls predicted by up to 60%, including maldistribution of MHN further burdening a strained system and staff (Looi et al. <span>2024</span>). Further complicating this situation is that Australia, compared to other OECD nations, has a heavy reliance on overseas-trained health professionals including mental health nurses (Looi et al. <span>2024</span>). To tackle these challenges, various programmes and funding initiatives have been introduced. However, surprisingly, few, if any, have acknowledged the psychotherapeutic capabilities of mental health nurses or actively included them in the collaborative solution (Hurley et al. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>This significant mental health nursing workforce issue extends to those with specialist mental health post-graduate qualifications. An undergraduate degree provides only the basic requirement to practice as a registered nurse, teaching broad content, theory and with limited opportunities for real-world clinical mental health placements across hospital and community settings. Post-graduate mental health qualifications are pursued by nurses who seek a pathway to specialise or advance their mental health practice (Cleary et al. <span>2024</span>). Nurses who complete specialist post-graduate qualifications are likely to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to engage in evidence-based practice, display higher order capabilities, have the capacity for critical thinking, clinical judgement, problem solving, and research capabilities (Cleary et al. <span>2024</span>). However, challenges to accessing postgraduate MHN education include costs, access, and time commitments, given that this cohort of potential students often works full-time.</p><p>Adequately qualified and experienced mental health staff working in academia are also needed to ensure the delivery of high-quality undergraduate mental health units and postgraduate mental health courses that mitigate the stigma associated with mental health nursing. Recruitment of mental health nurse academics across the education sector remains challenging, with recent research highlighting the need for reform in mental health nurse education (Lakeman et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>The Royal Australian &amp; New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) announced that over 200 psychiatrists resigned from NSW Health in January 2025, due to concerns about patient safety, and this was following the departure of approximately 140 psychiatrists from the public health system in 2024 (Gillespie <span>2025</span>). One of Australia's leading psychiatrists has urged the NSW government to take immediate action to rebuild the state's struggling mental health system, describing the situation as the worst it has ever been. Professor Pat McGorry, a former Australian of the Year, met with the NSW premier after the resignations of psychiatrists and the resulting hospital bed closures, warning that the conditions resemble those of an under-resourced healthcare system, where severely ill patients are routinely turned away (Dias and Donaldson <span>2025</span>). GPs have warned that this mass resignation could push the mental health sector into crisis—a sector that has been described as critically understaffed, meaning that patient care is endangered, and staff that are in the sector are under enormous strain (Gillespie <span>2025</span>).</p><p>In 2019, approximately 2.8 million Australians provided practical and emotional support for a person they cared about, with about 240 000, or 8.6% informal carers identified as caring for a person living with a mental illness (Skehan and Fitzpatrick <span>2019</span>). These informal carers save the government over $13 billion annually; however, this cohort is mostly unsupported, with only some paid a carer allowance, despite the practical, physical, financial and emotional demands of their role (Skehan and Fitzpatrick <span>2019</span>). As Skehan and Fitzpatrick (<span>2019</span>) rightly highlight, people caring for someone with a mental illness also need timely and equitable access to interventions for their own mental well-being, and there is a need for an agenda that identifies carers' rights, including the right to not have their own mental health and well-being compromised due to their important caring role.</p><p>The exclusion of people from accessing timely mental health care, combined with deficiencies in support services for people with mental illness, significantly impacts their quality of life and that of their families and carers (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. <span>2019</span>). Families meeting this unmet need do so often at great personal cost, including financial, physical and/or mental and this disadvantage is a determinant of mental ill health, as is discrimination and stigma. As flagged in the sections above, there are also burdens upon mental health staff and frontline mental health nurses due to resourcing and workforce issues (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. <span>2019</span>).</p><p>The current state of mental health care represents both a crisis and a critical opportunity for reform. Expanding the role of specialist mental health nurse practitioners in community settings could significantly improve access to care, particularly by embedding them within general practice to provide direct, accessible support to patients, families, and support the work of general practice. Strengthening Medicare funding for mental health services is essential, ensuring that those in lower socio-economic areas—who disproportionately experience mental health distress and health disparities—receive the care they need. Without targeted investment and systemic change, inequities in mental health care will continue to widen, leaving vulnerable populations without adequate support. Urgent policy action is required to transform the system into one that is equitable, sustainable, and capable of meeting the growing demand for mental health services.</p><p>In 2024, philanthropist and humanitarian Reverend Bill Crews said that neglecting one vulnerable group ultimately affects society as a whole. People living with mental illness have the right to effective healthcare, regardless of their social situation, their postcode or their household income. The time to act is now, and we must work together with other disciplines and with service users and their carers to advocate for proper resourcing for mental health care. The need for joint advocacy, for a united front for mental health services to be appropriately resourced, has never been greater. The growing mental health crisis demands a collective response, with nursing, general practice, psychiatry, allied health, policymakers, consumers, carers, and third sector services all advocating strongly for change. Policymakers must recognise the critical contributions of all healthcare professionals and provide the necessary resources to support safe and effective patient care and workforce sustainability. Real change requires not just investment in services, but a commitment to supporting everyone involved in delivering them. Australia's mental health workforce is ready to meet the challenge and needs the support of government to make it happen.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australia's Mental Health Landscape: Collaborating Across Professions to Advocate for Equitable and Well-Resourced Mental Health Care\",\"authors\":\"A. O. Debra Jackson,&nbsp;Michelle Cleary,&nbsp;A. M. Kim Usher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Australia's mental health system is under continuing and unprecedented strain, with growing demand threatening to overwhelm public services. Mental health care is inherently multidisciplinary, requiring strong collaboration among nursing, medicine, and allied health professionals, alongside meaningful and authentic engagement with consumers and carers, to ensure comprehensive and effective support for patients and communities. However, for many years now, mental health services have been under resourced, and there have not been adequate services to meet demand (Roche et al. <span>2018</span>). In 2023, Mental Health Carers NSW Inc., produced a report that said, <i>“The work of past inquiries has made a convincing case that a significant increase in mental health funding is a prerequisite to achieving meaningful change. This key recommendation has been largely ignored and mental health funding as a proportion of overall health funding has remained stagnant for the past two decades</i>.” (p.24).</p><p>The consequences of this prolonged under-resourcing are becoming starkly evident. Frontline healthcare workers characterise the mental health system as overly complicated, difficult to access, occasionally ineffective, and increasingly inequitable. They highlight a system that is poorly funded, disjointed, and not serving its intended purpose (NSW Branch of the Royal Australian New Zealand College of Psychiatrists <span>2023</span>). There are significant workforce shortages across the mental health sector, including acute and chronic shortages of mental health nurses. There is an urgent need to address the critical shortage of mental health nurses, as highlighted by the Productivity Commission, with immediate action required to support and expand the nursing workforce to ensure effective, multidisciplinary mental health care (Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Health and Aged Care) <span>2022</span>). This may mitigate the very real issue of substituting other disciplines, which is occurring across the sector, with limited if any evaluation of such role substitution (Looi et al. <span>2024</span>). General practitioners (GPs) have raised concerns about limited access to equitable and affordable mental health care (The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners <span>2024</span>). Most recently, New South Wales (NSW) has seen a mass resignation of psychiatrists (Gillespie <span>2025</span>; Dias and Donaldson <span>2025</span>). Together, these issues have created a crisis in mental health care. In this editorial, we emphasise the need for health professionals to collaborate in advocating for adequate resourcing of mental health services.</p><p>For decades, mental health services in Australia have been chronically underfunded despite multiple inquiries and reforms. In New South Wales (NSW) the Richmond Report of 1983 proposed closing psychiatric hospitals in favour of well-resourced community health centres, aiming to provide community-based care for people with chronic mental illness rather than simply placing people in institutions. A decade later, the Report of the National Inquiry into the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness was released, which detailed widespread systemic human rights abuses of people affected by mental illness and identified the need for a more concerted action by government (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREORC] <span>1993</span>). Many of the issues highlighted in this Report remain current for people living with mental illness, their carers, and family (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. <span>2019</span>). Although these initiatives helped shape services, drive cultural change, and spark improvements, successive governments have failed to fully implement this vision (Crews <span>2024</span>). Instead, deinstitutionalization was used as a cost-cutting measure, leaving many individuals with serious mental illness without sufficient support. As a result, rather than receiving proper care, many people with serious mental illness ended up in prisons, homeless, or cycling in and out of underfunded and overstretched services (Crews <span>2024</span>). The failure to invest in adequate community-based care has placed enormous strain on the mental health system, leaving vulnerable individuals and families to navigate complex illnesses with little or no support.</p><p>Mental distress in the community has continued to rise, with resourcing for mental health services not keeping pace with need, resulting in considerable disparities in access to mental health services. In Australia, First Nations communities experience high levels of mental health distress, and this distress is compounded by experiencing racism and discrimination in day-to-day life (AIHW <span>undated</span>). Experiences of unfair treatment have been reported in 34% of First Nations People living with an identified mental health issue, compared to &lt; 20% who did not have such a diagnosis (AIHW <span>undated</span>). A recent study reported that 29% of working-age adults in Australia's lowest-income households experience significant mental distress, compared to approximately 11% in the highest-income households (Dawadi et al. <span>2024</span>). In addition, the study highlighted that individuals residing in the most disadvantaged areas receive six times fewer Medicare-subsidised mental health services than those living in wealthier regions, despite being in greater need of access to services (Dawadi et al. <span>2024</span>). What this means is that Australians residing in the most disadvantaged regions experience the greatest mental health challenges but have limited access to mental health care services (Dawadi et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Mental health nurses (MHN) numbers are not high enough currently to meet workforce demand, with identified shortfalls predicted by up to 60%, including maldistribution of MHN further burdening a strained system and staff (Looi et al. <span>2024</span>). Further complicating this situation is that Australia, compared to other OECD nations, has a heavy reliance on overseas-trained health professionals including mental health nurses (Looi et al. <span>2024</span>). To tackle these challenges, various programmes and funding initiatives have been introduced. However, surprisingly, few, if any, have acknowledged the psychotherapeutic capabilities of mental health nurses or actively included them in the collaborative solution (Hurley et al. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>This significant mental health nursing workforce issue extends to those with specialist mental health post-graduate qualifications. An undergraduate degree provides only the basic requirement to practice as a registered nurse, teaching broad content, theory and with limited opportunities for real-world clinical mental health placements across hospital and community settings. Post-graduate mental health qualifications are pursued by nurses who seek a pathway to specialise or advance their mental health practice (Cleary et al. <span>2024</span>). Nurses who complete specialist post-graduate qualifications are likely to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to engage in evidence-based practice, display higher order capabilities, have the capacity for critical thinking, clinical judgement, problem solving, and research capabilities (Cleary et al. <span>2024</span>). However, challenges to accessing postgraduate MHN education include costs, access, and time commitments, given that this cohort of potential students often works full-time.</p><p>Adequately qualified and experienced mental health staff working in academia are also needed to ensure the delivery of high-quality undergraduate mental health units and postgraduate mental health courses that mitigate the stigma associated with mental health nursing. Recruitment of mental health nurse academics across the education sector remains challenging, with recent research highlighting the need for reform in mental health nurse education (Lakeman et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>The Royal Australian &amp; New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) announced that over 200 psychiatrists resigned from NSW Health in January 2025, due to concerns about patient safety, and this was following the departure of approximately 140 psychiatrists from the public health system in 2024 (Gillespie <span>2025</span>). One of Australia's leading psychiatrists has urged the NSW government to take immediate action to rebuild the state's struggling mental health system, describing the situation as the worst it has ever been. Professor Pat McGorry, a former Australian of the Year, met with the NSW premier after the resignations of psychiatrists and the resulting hospital bed closures, warning that the conditions resemble those of an under-resourced healthcare system, where severely ill patients are routinely turned away (Dias and Donaldson <span>2025</span>). GPs have warned that this mass resignation could push the mental health sector into crisis—a sector that has been described as critically understaffed, meaning that patient care is endangered, and staff that are in the sector are under enormous strain (Gillespie <span>2025</span>).</p><p>In 2019, approximately 2.8 million Australians provided practical and emotional support for a person they cared about, with about 240 000, or 8.6% informal carers identified as caring for a person living with a mental illness (Skehan and Fitzpatrick <span>2019</span>). These informal carers save the government over $13 billion annually; however, this cohort is mostly unsupported, with only some paid a carer allowance, despite the practical, physical, financial and emotional demands of their role (Skehan and Fitzpatrick <span>2019</span>). As Skehan and Fitzpatrick (<span>2019</span>) rightly highlight, people caring for someone with a mental illness also need timely and equitable access to interventions for their own mental well-being, and there is a need for an agenda that identifies carers' rights, including the right to not have their own mental health and well-being compromised due to their important caring role.</p><p>The exclusion of people from accessing timely mental health care, combined with deficiencies in support services for people with mental illness, significantly impacts their quality of life and that of their families and carers (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. <span>2019</span>). Families meeting this unmet need do so often at great personal cost, including financial, physical and/or mental and this disadvantage is a determinant of mental ill health, as is discrimination and stigma. As flagged in the sections above, there are also burdens upon mental health staff and frontline mental health nurses due to resourcing and workforce issues (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. <span>2019</span>).</p><p>The current state of mental health care represents both a crisis and a critical opportunity for reform. Expanding the role of specialist mental health nurse practitioners in community settings could significantly improve access to care, particularly by embedding them within general practice to provide direct, accessible support to patients, families, and support the work of general practice. Strengthening Medicare funding for mental health services is essential, ensuring that those in lower socio-economic areas—who disproportionately experience mental health distress and health disparities—receive the care they need. Without targeted investment and systemic change, inequities in mental health care will continue to widen, leaving vulnerable populations without adequate support. Urgent policy action is required to transform the system into one that is equitable, sustainable, and capable of meeting the growing demand for mental health services.</p><p>In 2024, philanthropist and humanitarian Reverend Bill Crews said that neglecting one vulnerable group ultimately affects society as a whole. People living with mental illness have the right to effective healthcare, regardless of their social situation, their postcode or their household income. The time to act is now, and we must work together with other disciplines and with service users and their carers to advocate for proper resourcing for mental health care. The need for joint advocacy, for a united front for mental health services to be appropriately resourced, has never been greater. The growing mental health crisis demands a collective response, with nursing, general practice, psychiatry, allied health, policymakers, consumers, carers, and third sector services all advocating strongly for change. Policymakers must recognise the critical contributions of all healthcare professionals and provide the necessary resources to support safe and effective patient care and workforce sustainability. Real change requires not just investment in services, but a commitment to supporting everyone involved in delivering them. Australia's mental health workforce is ready to meet the challenge and needs the support of government to make it happen.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70041\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的一项研究报告称,在澳大利亚最低收入家庭中,29%的工作年龄成年人经历过严重的精神困扰,而在最高收入家庭中,这一比例约为11% (Dawadi et al. 2024)。此外,该研究强调,生活在最贫困地区的个人获得的医疗保险补贴的精神卫生服务比生活在较富裕地区的人少六倍,尽管他们更需要获得服务(Dawadi et al. 2024)。这意味着居住在最弱势地区的澳大利亚人面临着最大的心理健康挑战,但获得心理保健服务的机会有限(Dawadi et al. 2024)。目前,精神卫生护士(MHN)的数量不足以满足劳动力需求,预计已确定的缺口高达60%,包括MHN的分布不均进一步加重了本已紧张的系统和工作人员的负担(Looi et al. 2024)。使这种情况进一步复杂化的是,与其他经合组织国家相比,澳大利亚严重依赖海外培训的卫生专业人员,包括精神卫生护士(Looi et al. 2024)。为了应对这些挑战,政府推出了各种方案和资助举措。然而,令人惊讶的是,很少有人(如果有的话)承认心理健康护士的心理治疗能力,或者积极地将其纳入协作解决方案(Hurley et al. 2022)。这个重要的心理健康护理人力问题延伸到那些具有专业心理健康研究生资格的人。本科学位只提供了作为一名注册护士的基本要求,教授广泛的内容、理论,在医院和社区环境中进行现实世界的临床心理健康实习的机会有限。研究生心理健康资格由寻求专业化或推进其心理健康实践途径的护士追求(Cleary等人,2024)。完成专业研究生资格的护士可能具备从事循证实践的技能和知识,表现出更高层次的能力,具有批判性思维、临床判断、解决问题和研究能力的能力(Cleary et al. 2024)。然而,考虑到这群潜在的学生通常是全职工作,获得硕士学位教育的挑战包括成本、机会和时间承诺。还需要在学术界工作的合格和经验丰富的精神卫生工作人员,以确保提供高质量的本科精神卫生单位和研究生精神卫生课程,以减轻与精神卫生护理有关的耻辱。整个教育部门招聘心理健康护士学者仍然具有挑战性,最近的研究强调了心理健康护士教育改革的必要性(Lakeman et al. 2024)。澳大利亚皇家博物馆新西兰精神科医学院(RANZCP)宣布,由于对患者安全的担忧,2025年1月,超过200名精神科医生从新南威尔士州卫生部辞职,这是继2024年大约140名精神科医生从公共卫生系统离职(Gillespie 2025)之后。澳大利亚一位著名精神病学家敦促新南威尔士州政府立即采取行动,重建该州挣扎中的精神卫生系统,称目前的情况是有史以来最糟糕的。前澳大利亚年度人物Pat McGorry教授在精神科医生辞职并导致医院床位关闭后会见了新南威尔士州总理,他警告说,这种情况类似于资源不足的医疗保健系统,重病患者经常被拒之门外(Dias和Donaldson 2025)。全科医生警告说,这种大规模的辞职可能会将精神卫生部门推向危机——一个被描述为人手严重不足的部门,这意味着病人护理受到威胁,该部门的工作人员承受着巨大的压力(Gillespie 2025)。2019年,大约280万澳大利亚人为他们关心的人提供了实际和情感上的支持,其中约24万(8.6%)的非正式护理人员被确定为照顾精神疾病患者(Skehan and Fitzpatrick 2019)。这些非正式的护工每年为政府节省130多亿美元;然而,这一群体大多没有得到支持,尽管他们的角色在实际、身体、经济和情感上都有需求,但只有一些人获得了照顾者津贴(Skehan and Fitzpatrick 2019)。正如Skehan和Fitzpatrick(2019)正确强调的那样,照顾精神疾病患者的人也需要及时和公平地获得对其自身心理健康的干预措施,并且需要制定一项议程,确定照顾者的权利,包括不因其重要的照顾角色而损害其自身心理健康和福祉的权利。 人们无法及时获得精神卫生保健,再加上对精神疾病患者的支持服务不足,严重影响了他们及其家人和照顾者的生活质量(新南威尔士州精神卫生照顾者公司,2019年)。满足这一未满足需求的家庭往往要付出巨大的个人成本,包括经济、身体和/或精神成本,这种不利条件是精神不健康的一个决定因素,歧视和耻辱也是如此。如上所述,由于资源和劳动力问题,精神卫生工作人员和一线精神卫生护士也面临着负担(新南威尔士州精神卫生护理人员公司,2019年)。精神卫生保健的现状既是一场危机,也是改革的关键机遇。扩大专业精神卫生护士从业人员在社区环境中的作用可以显著改善获得护理的机会,特别是通过将其纳入全科实践,为患者、家庭提供直接、可获得的支持,并支持全科实践的工作。加强医疗保险对精神卫生服务的资助至关重要,以确保社会经济地位较低地区的人(他们严重遭受精神卫生困扰和健康差异)获得所需的护理。如果没有针对性的投资和系统性的变革,精神卫生保健方面的不公平现象将继续扩大,使弱势群体得不到足够的支持。需要采取紧急政策行动,将该系统转变为一个公平、可持续并能够满足日益增长的精神卫生服务需求的系统。2024年,慈善家和人道主义者比尔·克鲁斯牧师表示,忽视一个弱势群体最终会影响整个社会。精神疾病患者有权获得有效的医疗保健,无论其社会状况、邮政编码或家庭收入如何。现在是采取行动的时候了,我们必须与其他学科以及服务使用者及其照护者共同努力,倡导为精神卫生保健提供适当的资源。联合宣传,为精神卫生服务提供适当资源的统一战线的必要性从未如此强烈。日益严重的精神卫生危机需要集体应对,护理、全科医生、精神病学、联合卫生、政策制定者、消费者、护理人员和第三部门服务都强烈倡导变革。决策者必须认识到所有医疗保健专业人员的重要贡献,并提供必要的资源,以支持安全有效的患者护理和劳动力的可持续性。真正的变革不仅需要对服务进行投资,还需要承诺支持参与提供服务的每个人。澳大利亚的精神卫生工作者已经准备好迎接挑战,并需要政府的支持来实现这一目标。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Australia's Mental Health Landscape: Collaborating Across Professions to Advocate for Equitable and Well-Resourced Mental Health Care

Australia's mental health system is under continuing and unprecedented strain, with growing demand threatening to overwhelm public services. Mental health care is inherently multidisciplinary, requiring strong collaboration among nursing, medicine, and allied health professionals, alongside meaningful and authentic engagement with consumers and carers, to ensure comprehensive and effective support for patients and communities. However, for many years now, mental health services have been under resourced, and there have not been adequate services to meet demand (Roche et al. 2018). In 2023, Mental Health Carers NSW Inc., produced a report that said, “The work of past inquiries has made a convincing case that a significant increase in mental health funding is a prerequisite to achieving meaningful change. This key recommendation has been largely ignored and mental health funding as a proportion of overall health funding has remained stagnant for the past two decades.” (p.24).

The consequences of this prolonged under-resourcing are becoming starkly evident. Frontline healthcare workers characterise the mental health system as overly complicated, difficult to access, occasionally ineffective, and increasingly inequitable. They highlight a system that is poorly funded, disjointed, and not serving its intended purpose (NSW Branch of the Royal Australian New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2023). There are significant workforce shortages across the mental health sector, including acute and chronic shortages of mental health nurses. There is an urgent need to address the critical shortage of mental health nurses, as highlighted by the Productivity Commission, with immediate action required to support and expand the nursing workforce to ensure effective, multidisciplinary mental health care (Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Health and Aged Care) 2022). This may mitigate the very real issue of substituting other disciplines, which is occurring across the sector, with limited if any evaluation of such role substitution (Looi et al. 2024). General practitioners (GPs) have raised concerns about limited access to equitable and affordable mental health care (The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners 2024). Most recently, New South Wales (NSW) has seen a mass resignation of psychiatrists (Gillespie 2025; Dias and Donaldson 2025). Together, these issues have created a crisis in mental health care. In this editorial, we emphasise the need for health professionals to collaborate in advocating for adequate resourcing of mental health services.

For decades, mental health services in Australia have been chronically underfunded despite multiple inquiries and reforms. In New South Wales (NSW) the Richmond Report of 1983 proposed closing psychiatric hospitals in favour of well-resourced community health centres, aiming to provide community-based care for people with chronic mental illness rather than simply placing people in institutions. A decade later, the Report of the National Inquiry into the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness was released, which detailed widespread systemic human rights abuses of people affected by mental illness and identified the need for a more concerted action by government (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREORC] 1993). Many of the issues highlighted in this Report remain current for people living with mental illness, their carers, and family (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. 2019). Although these initiatives helped shape services, drive cultural change, and spark improvements, successive governments have failed to fully implement this vision (Crews 2024). Instead, deinstitutionalization was used as a cost-cutting measure, leaving many individuals with serious mental illness without sufficient support. As a result, rather than receiving proper care, many people with serious mental illness ended up in prisons, homeless, or cycling in and out of underfunded and overstretched services (Crews 2024). The failure to invest in adequate community-based care has placed enormous strain on the mental health system, leaving vulnerable individuals and families to navigate complex illnesses with little or no support.

Mental distress in the community has continued to rise, with resourcing for mental health services not keeping pace with need, resulting in considerable disparities in access to mental health services. In Australia, First Nations communities experience high levels of mental health distress, and this distress is compounded by experiencing racism and discrimination in day-to-day life (AIHW undated). Experiences of unfair treatment have been reported in 34% of First Nations People living with an identified mental health issue, compared to < 20% who did not have such a diagnosis (AIHW undated). A recent study reported that 29% of working-age adults in Australia's lowest-income households experience significant mental distress, compared to approximately 11% in the highest-income households (Dawadi et al. 2024). In addition, the study highlighted that individuals residing in the most disadvantaged areas receive six times fewer Medicare-subsidised mental health services than those living in wealthier regions, despite being in greater need of access to services (Dawadi et al. 2024). What this means is that Australians residing in the most disadvantaged regions experience the greatest mental health challenges but have limited access to mental health care services (Dawadi et al. 2024).

Mental health nurses (MHN) numbers are not high enough currently to meet workforce demand, with identified shortfalls predicted by up to 60%, including maldistribution of MHN further burdening a strained system and staff (Looi et al. 2024). Further complicating this situation is that Australia, compared to other OECD nations, has a heavy reliance on overseas-trained health professionals including mental health nurses (Looi et al. 2024). To tackle these challenges, various programmes and funding initiatives have been introduced. However, surprisingly, few, if any, have acknowledged the psychotherapeutic capabilities of mental health nurses or actively included them in the collaborative solution (Hurley et al. 2022).

This significant mental health nursing workforce issue extends to those with specialist mental health post-graduate qualifications. An undergraduate degree provides only the basic requirement to practice as a registered nurse, teaching broad content, theory and with limited opportunities for real-world clinical mental health placements across hospital and community settings. Post-graduate mental health qualifications are pursued by nurses who seek a pathway to specialise or advance their mental health practice (Cleary et al. 2024). Nurses who complete specialist post-graduate qualifications are likely to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to engage in evidence-based practice, display higher order capabilities, have the capacity for critical thinking, clinical judgement, problem solving, and research capabilities (Cleary et al. 2024). However, challenges to accessing postgraduate MHN education include costs, access, and time commitments, given that this cohort of potential students often works full-time.

Adequately qualified and experienced mental health staff working in academia are also needed to ensure the delivery of high-quality undergraduate mental health units and postgraduate mental health courses that mitigate the stigma associated with mental health nursing. Recruitment of mental health nurse academics across the education sector remains challenging, with recent research highlighting the need for reform in mental health nurse education (Lakeman et al. 2024).

The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) announced that over 200 psychiatrists resigned from NSW Health in January 2025, due to concerns about patient safety, and this was following the departure of approximately 140 psychiatrists from the public health system in 2024 (Gillespie 2025). One of Australia's leading psychiatrists has urged the NSW government to take immediate action to rebuild the state's struggling mental health system, describing the situation as the worst it has ever been. Professor Pat McGorry, a former Australian of the Year, met with the NSW premier after the resignations of psychiatrists and the resulting hospital bed closures, warning that the conditions resemble those of an under-resourced healthcare system, where severely ill patients are routinely turned away (Dias and Donaldson 2025). GPs have warned that this mass resignation could push the mental health sector into crisis—a sector that has been described as critically understaffed, meaning that patient care is endangered, and staff that are in the sector are under enormous strain (Gillespie 2025).

In 2019, approximately 2.8 million Australians provided practical and emotional support for a person they cared about, with about 240 000, or 8.6% informal carers identified as caring for a person living with a mental illness (Skehan and Fitzpatrick 2019). These informal carers save the government over $13 billion annually; however, this cohort is mostly unsupported, with only some paid a carer allowance, despite the practical, physical, financial and emotional demands of their role (Skehan and Fitzpatrick 2019). As Skehan and Fitzpatrick (2019) rightly highlight, people caring for someone with a mental illness also need timely and equitable access to interventions for their own mental well-being, and there is a need for an agenda that identifies carers' rights, including the right to not have their own mental health and well-being compromised due to their important caring role.

The exclusion of people from accessing timely mental health care, combined with deficiencies in support services for people with mental illness, significantly impacts their quality of life and that of their families and carers (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. 2019). Families meeting this unmet need do so often at great personal cost, including financial, physical and/or mental and this disadvantage is a determinant of mental ill health, as is discrimination and stigma. As flagged in the sections above, there are also burdens upon mental health staff and frontline mental health nurses due to resourcing and workforce issues (Mental Health Carers NSW Inc. 2019).

The current state of mental health care represents both a crisis and a critical opportunity for reform. Expanding the role of specialist mental health nurse practitioners in community settings could significantly improve access to care, particularly by embedding them within general practice to provide direct, accessible support to patients, families, and support the work of general practice. Strengthening Medicare funding for mental health services is essential, ensuring that those in lower socio-economic areas—who disproportionately experience mental health distress and health disparities—receive the care they need. Without targeted investment and systemic change, inequities in mental health care will continue to widen, leaving vulnerable populations without adequate support. Urgent policy action is required to transform the system into one that is equitable, sustainable, and capable of meeting the growing demand for mental health services.

In 2024, philanthropist and humanitarian Reverend Bill Crews said that neglecting one vulnerable group ultimately affects society as a whole. People living with mental illness have the right to effective healthcare, regardless of their social situation, their postcode or their household income. The time to act is now, and we must work together with other disciplines and with service users and their carers to advocate for proper resourcing for mental health care. The need for joint advocacy, for a united front for mental health services to be appropriately resourced, has never been greater. The growing mental health crisis demands a collective response, with nursing, general practice, psychiatry, allied health, policymakers, consumers, carers, and third sector services all advocating strongly for change. Policymakers must recognise the critical contributions of all healthcare professionals and provide the necessary resources to support safe and effective patient care and workforce sustainability. Real change requires not just investment in services, but a commitment to supporting everyone involved in delivering them. Australia's mental health workforce is ready to meet the challenge and needs the support of government to make it happen.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信