碳减排政策对跨境供应链再制造的影响:进口配额的作用

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Wei Li;Jian Kang;Hui Sun;Gu Pang
{"title":"碳减排政策对跨境供应链再制造的影响:进口配额的作用","authors":"Wei Li;Jian Kang;Hui Sun;Gu Pang","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3555392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the strategic interplay between import quotas and carbon abatement policies in cross-border closed-loop supply chains. Specifically, it examines the impact of three distinct carbon policies—carbon constraints (Policy A), carbon trading (Policy B), and carbon tariffs and taxes (Policy C) on the remanufacturing production decisions within a supply chain comprising an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a retailer, as well as on the social welfare of the importing country and environmental sustainability. The findings challenge conventional assumptions by demonstrating that higher carbon trading prices imposed by importing countries do not necessarily incentivize OEMs to reduce emissions or promote remanufacturing. Instead, more stringent carbon tariffs are more effective in encouraging emission reductions. Furthermore, the optimal policy mix for maximizing social welfare and environmental benefits is contingent upon the levels of import and carbon quotas: Policy A is most effective under low quotas, Policy B under high quotas, and Policy C under moderate quotas. When remanufactured products exhibit lower carbon footprints, reducing import quotas enhances environmental benefits, whereas lowering carbon quotas improves social welfare under Policy A. In addition, the study highlights that governments can calibrate import quotas in response to fluctuations in carbon trading prices or carbon tariffs to achieve a win-win between economic and environmental objectives. By advancing a theoretical framework for policy optimization in cross-border closed-loop supply chains, this research provides valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders in designing sustainable and economically viable carbon abatement strategies.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1281-1296"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Carbon Abatement Policies on Cross-Border Supply Chain Remanufacturing: The Role of Import Quotas\",\"authors\":\"Wei Li;Jian Kang;Hui Sun;Gu Pang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2025.3555392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the strategic interplay between import quotas and carbon abatement policies in cross-border closed-loop supply chains. Specifically, it examines the impact of three distinct carbon policies—carbon constraints (Policy A), carbon trading (Policy B), and carbon tariffs and taxes (Policy C) on the remanufacturing production decisions within a supply chain comprising an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a retailer, as well as on the social welfare of the importing country and environmental sustainability. The findings challenge conventional assumptions by demonstrating that higher carbon trading prices imposed by importing countries do not necessarily incentivize OEMs to reduce emissions or promote remanufacturing. Instead, more stringent carbon tariffs are more effective in encouraging emission reductions. Furthermore, the optimal policy mix for maximizing social welfare and environmental benefits is contingent upon the levels of import and carbon quotas: Policy A is most effective under low quotas, Policy B under high quotas, and Policy C under moderate quotas. When remanufactured products exhibit lower carbon footprints, reducing import quotas enhances environmental benefits, whereas lowering carbon quotas improves social welfare under Policy A. In addition, the study highlights that governments can calibrate import quotas in response to fluctuations in carbon trading prices or carbon tariffs to achieve a win-win between economic and environmental objectives. By advancing a theoretical framework for policy optimization in cross-border closed-loop supply chains, this research provides valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders in designing sustainable and economically viable carbon abatement strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"1281-1296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10944523/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10944523/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了跨境闭环供应链中进口配额与碳减排政策之间的战略相互作用。具体而言,本文考察了三种不同的碳政策——碳约束(政策A)、碳交易(政策B)和碳关税和税收(政策C)对由原始设备制造商(OEM)和零售商组成的供应链中再制造生产决策的影响,以及对进口国社会福利和环境可持续性的影响。研究结果挑战了传统的假设,证明进口国征收的更高的碳交易价格并不一定会激励原始设备制造商减少排放或促进再制造。相反,更严格的碳关税在鼓励减排方面更有效。此外,实现社会福利和环境效益最大化的最优政策组合取决于进口和碳配额水平:A政策在低配额下最有效,B政策在高配额下最有效,C政策在中等配额下最有效。当再制造产品的碳足迹较低时,减少进口配额可以提高环境效益,而在a政策下,降低碳配额可以提高社会福利。此外,研究强调,政府可以根据碳交易价格或碳关税的波动调整进口配额,以实现经济目标与环境目标的双赢。通过提出跨境闭环供应链政策优化的理论框架,本研究为决策者和行业利益相关者设计可持续和经济上可行的碳减排战略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Carbon Abatement Policies on Cross-Border Supply Chain Remanufacturing: The Role of Import Quotas
This study investigates the strategic interplay between import quotas and carbon abatement policies in cross-border closed-loop supply chains. Specifically, it examines the impact of three distinct carbon policies—carbon constraints (Policy A), carbon trading (Policy B), and carbon tariffs and taxes (Policy C) on the remanufacturing production decisions within a supply chain comprising an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a retailer, as well as on the social welfare of the importing country and environmental sustainability. The findings challenge conventional assumptions by demonstrating that higher carbon trading prices imposed by importing countries do not necessarily incentivize OEMs to reduce emissions or promote remanufacturing. Instead, more stringent carbon tariffs are more effective in encouraging emission reductions. Furthermore, the optimal policy mix for maximizing social welfare and environmental benefits is contingent upon the levels of import and carbon quotas: Policy A is most effective under low quotas, Policy B under high quotas, and Policy C under moderate quotas. When remanufactured products exhibit lower carbon footprints, reducing import quotas enhances environmental benefits, whereas lowering carbon quotas improves social welfare under Policy A. In addition, the study highlights that governments can calibrate import quotas in response to fluctuations in carbon trading prices or carbon tariffs to achieve a win-win between economic and environmental objectives. By advancing a theoretical framework for policy optimization in cross-border closed-loop supply chains, this research provides valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders in designing sustainable and economically viable carbon abatement strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信