“前进”:农民心理健康管理策略的旁注分析

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Asa Billington , Courtney Cuthbertson , Sam Iwinski , Yifan Hu , Madhulika Krishnaswamy , Josie Rudolphi
{"title":"“前进”:农民心理健康管理策略的旁注分析","authors":"Asa Billington ,&nbsp;Courtney Cuthbertson ,&nbsp;Sam Iwinski ,&nbsp;Yifan Hu ,&nbsp;Madhulika Krishnaswamy ,&nbsp;Josie Rudolphi","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human health in agriculture is essential to the sustainability of the field. Mental health of people who work in agriculture has been concerning to community members, researchers, and practitioners as suicide rates have been higher than the general population. This study involved surveys of agricultural producers about their mental health, barriers to accessing care, farming experience, and demographic information. In total, n = 67 surveys were returned with comments or markings outside of the structure of the survey (<em>marginalia</em>). We conducted a qualitative analysis of this unique form of data to understand themes related to mental health in agriculture. Using grounded theory techniques, the analysis revealed themes related to dealing with mental health, and more specifically, three subthemes of self-reliance, religion, and distancing/minimizing mental health. Findings highlight how dealing with mental health for this subgroup of agricultural producers meant using one's own resources and not relying on other people or healthcare for assistance or support. Findings from the current study can be used to align outreach efforts to support people who work in agriculture and demonstrate the value of unanticipated data, particularly in relation to hard-to-reach populations such as agricultural producers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 103649"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Move forward”: A marginalia analysis of farmers’ mental health management strategies\",\"authors\":\"Asa Billington ,&nbsp;Courtney Cuthbertson ,&nbsp;Sam Iwinski ,&nbsp;Yifan Hu ,&nbsp;Madhulika Krishnaswamy ,&nbsp;Josie Rudolphi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Human health in agriculture is essential to the sustainability of the field. Mental health of people who work in agriculture has been concerning to community members, researchers, and practitioners as suicide rates have been higher than the general population. This study involved surveys of agricultural producers about their mental health, barriers to accessing care, farming experience, and demographic information. In total, n = 67 surveys were returned with comments or markings outside of the structure of the survey (<em>marginalia</em>). We conducted a qualitative analysis of this unique form of data to understand themes related to mental health in agriculture. Using grounded theory techniques, the analysis revealed themes related to dealing with mental health, and more specifically, three subthemes of self-reliance, religion, and distancing/minimizing mental health. Findings highlight how dealing with mental health for this subgroup of agricultural producers meant using one's own resources and not relying on other people or healthcare for assistance or support. Findings from the current study can be used to align outreach efforts to support people who work in agriculture and demonstrate the value of unanticipated data, particularly in relation to hard-to-reach populations such as agricultural producers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000890\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业中的人类健康对田地的可持续性至关重要。由于自杀率高于一般人群,从事农业工作的人的心理健康一直是社区成员、研究人员和从业人员关注的问题。这项研究包括对农业生产者的心理健康、获得护理的障碍、农业经验和人口统计信息进行调查。总共有n = 67份调查返回,并在调查结构之外进行了评论或标记(旁注)。我们对这种独特的数据形式进行了定性分析,以了解与农业心理健康相关的主题。利用扎根理论技术,分析揭示了与处理心理健康相关的主题,更具体地说,是三个子主题:自力更生、宗教和疏远/最小化心理健康。研究结果强调了如何处理这一农业生产者亚群的心理健康问题意味着使用自己的资源,而不是依靠其他人或医疗保健来获得帮助或支持。当前研究的结果可用于协调外联工作,以支持从事农业工作的人,并展示意外数据的价值,特别是与农业生产者等难以接触的人群有关的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Move forward”: A marginalia analysis of farmers’ mental health management strategies
Human health in agriculture is essential to the sustainability of the field. Mental health of people who work in agriculture has been concerning to community members, researchers, and practitioners as suicide rates have been higher than the general population. This study involved surveys of agricultural producers about their mental health, barriers to accessing care, farming experience, and demographic information. In total, n = 67 surveys were returned with comments or markings outside of the structure of the survey (marginalia). We conducted a qualitative analysis of this unique form of data to understand themes related to mental health in agriculture. Using grounded theory techniques, the analysis revealed themes related to dealing with mental health, and more specifically, three subthemes of self-reliance, religion, and distancing/minimizing mental health. Findings highlight how dealing with mental health for this subgroup of agricultural producers meant using one's own resources and not relying on other people or healthcare for assistance or support. Findings from the current study can be used to align outreach efforts to support people who work in agriculture and demonstrate the value of unanticipated data, particularly in relation to hard-to-reach populations such as agricultural producers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信