智利瓦尔帕莱索地区基于性别的运输安全观念的系统分析

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Carolina Busco , Felipe González , Jeffrey P. Walters , Katherine Rozas
{"title":"智利瓦尔帕莱索地区基于性别的运输安全观念的系统分析","authors":"Carolina Busco ,&nbsp;Felipe González ,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Walters ,&nbsp;Katherine Rozas","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the complex and interconnected perceptions of insecurity within Gran Valparaíso's public transportation system, with a focus on gender-based differences. Through semi-structured interviews with 27 male and 24 female stakeholders, we used purposive text analysis (PTA) and qualitative system dynamics modeling to map mental models and identify key drivers of gendered perceptions of transportation security. The PTA revealed 31 factors influencing safety perceptions across five dimensions: State, Transport System, Bus Drivers, Social Issues, and User Behavior, along with 646 causal connections—409 and 237 of which related to public transportation challenges and solutions, respectively. Comparative analysis of the models for male and female stakeholders showed that while males mainly associate insecurity with crime, females face a broader array of concerns, including harassment, distrust, and inadequate infrastructure. The findings highlight how poor infrastructure, limited surveillance, and negligent driver behavior disproportionately affect female passengers' perceptions of safety. These results call for targeted interventions, including enhanced surveillance, better infrastructure, and gender-sensitive policies to improve security. To address these challenges, a systems approach is needed, incorporating both urban design improvements and community-based initiatives—such as alert systems and driver training—that reduce reliance on private security and create a more inclusive, accessible public transportation environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104221"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A system analysis of gender-based perceptions of transportation security in the Valparaiso region of Chile\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Busco ,&nbsp;Felipe González ,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Walters ,&nbsp;Katherine Rozas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the complex and interconnected perceptions of insecurity within Gran Valparaíso's public transportation system, with a focus on gender-based differences. Through semi-structured interviews with 27 male and 24 female stakeholders, we used purposive text analysis (PTA) and qualitative system dynamics modeling to map mental models and identify key drivers of gendered perceptions of transportation security. The PTA revealed 31 factors influencing safety perceptions across five dimensions: State, Transport System, Bus Drivers, Social Issues, and User Behavior, along with 646 causal connections—409 and 237 of which related to public transportation challenges and solutions, respectively. Comparative analysis of the models for male and female stakeholders showed that while males mainly associate insecurity with crime, females face a broader array of concerns, including harassment, distrust, and inadequate infrastructure. The findings highlight how poor infrastructure, limited surveillance, and negligent driver behavior disproportionately affect female passengers' perceptions of safety. These results call for targeted interventions, including enhanced surveillance, better infrastructure, and gender-sensitive policies to improve security. To address these challenges, a systems approach is needed, incorporating both urban design improvements and community-based initiatives—such as alert systems and driver training—that reduce reliance on private security and create a more inclusive, accessible public transportation environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325001127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325001127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了Gran Valparaíso公共交通系统中复杂而相互关联的不安全感,重点是性别差异。通过对27名男性和24名女性利益相关者的半结构化访谈,我们使用目的文本分析(PTA)和定性系统动力学建模来绘制心理模型,并确定交通安全性别认知的关键驱动因素。PTA揭示了影响安全认知的31个因素,涉及五个维度:国家、交通系统、公交司机、社会问题和用户行为,以及646个因果关系,其中409个和237个分别与公共交通挑战和解决方案有关。对男性和女性利益相关者模型的比较分析表明,尽管男性主要将不安全与犯罪联系在一起,但女性面临着更广泛的问题,包括骚扰、不信任和基础设施不足。研究结果强调了基础设施落后、监控有限和司机疏忽行为对女性乘客安全观念的影响。这些结果要求采取有针对性的干预措施,包括加强监测、改善基础设施和对性别问题有敏感认识的政策,以改善安全。为了应对这些挑战,需要一种系统的方法,将城市设计改进和基于社区的举措(如警报系统和驾驶员培训)结合起来,减少对私人保安的依赖,创造一个更包容、更便利的公共交通环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A system analysis of gender-based perceptions of transportation security in the Valparaiso region of Chile
This study explores the complex and interconnected perceptions of insecurity within Gran Valparaíso's public transportation system, with a focus on gender-based differences. Through semi-structured interviews with 27 male and 24 female stakeholders, we used purposive text analysis (PTA) and qualitative system dynamics modeling to map mental models and identify key drivers of gendered perceptions of transportation security. The PTA revealed 31 factors influencing safety perceptions across five dimensions: State, Transport System, Bus Drivers, Social Issues, and User Behavior, along with 646 causal connections—409 and 237 of which related to public transportation challenges and solutions, respectively. Comparative analysis of the models for male and female stakeholders showed that while males mainly associate insecurity with crime, females face a broader array of concerns, including harassment, distrust, and inadequate infrastructure. The findings highlight how poor infrastructure, limited surveillance, and negligent driver behavior disproportionately affect female passengers' perceptions of safety. These results call for targeted interventions, including enhanced surveillance, better infrastructure, and gender-sensitive policies to improve security. To address these challenges, a systems approach is needed, incorporating both urban design improvements and community-based initiatives—such as alert systems and driver training—that reduce reliance on private security and create a more inclusive, accessible public transportation environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信