Matthew Bourke , Hiu Fei Wendy Wang , Sarah A. McNaughton , George Thomas , Joseph Firth , Mike Trott , John Cairney
{"title":"健康生活方式行为群与抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰症状相关:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Matthew Bourke , Hiu Fei Wendy Wang , Sarah A. McNaughton , George Thomas , Joseph Firth , Mike Trott , John Cairney","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engagement in healthy and unhealthy lifestyle behaviours are related to a range of mental health outcomes. Most existing research has focussed on individual lifestyle behaviours, so it is not clear the extent to which clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours relate to mental health outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and quantitatively synthesise research which have examined the association between clusters of lifestyle behaviours with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. A systematic search of five electronic databases were conducted to identify studies which used person-centred approaches (e.g., cluster analysis, latent class analysis) to identify subgroups of participants based on at least two unique lifestyle behaviours (i.e., physical activity/sedentary behaviours, diet, sleep, alcohol/tobacco/drug use) and examined differences in symptoms of depression, anxiety, or psychological distress between clusters. A correlated and hierarchical random effects meta-analysis was used to synthesise the results. A total of 81 studies reporting on nearly one-million individual participants were included in the review. Results demonstrated that participants who engaged in the healthiest clusters of lifestyle behaviours reported significantly fewer symptoms of depression (SMD = −0.41), anxiety (SMD = −0.43) and psychological distress (SMD = −0.34) compared to participants engaging in less healthy combinations of lifestyle behaviours, and a dose response relationship was observed across outcomes. These results demonstrate that there is a moderate-to-strong relationship between engaging in clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours and mental health outcomes and demonstrate the importance of considering healthy lifestyle as a whole instead of as individual parts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102585"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours are associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Bourke , Hiu Fei Wendy Wang , Sarah A. McNaughton , George Thomas , Joseph Firth , Mike Trott , John Cairney\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Engagement in healthy and unhealthy lifestyle behaviours are related to a range of mental health outcomes. Most existing research has focussed on individual lifestyle behaviours, so it is not clear the extent to which clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours relate to mental health outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and quantitatively synthesise research which have examined the association between clusters of lifestyle behaviours with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. A systematic search of five electronic databases were conducted to identify studies which used person-centred approaches (e.g., cluster analysis, latent class analysis) to identify subgroups of participants based on at least two unique lifestyle behaviours (i.e., physical activity/sedentary behaviours, diet, sleep, alcohol/tobacco/drug use) and examined differences in symptoms of depression, anxiety, or psychological distress between clusters. A correlated and hierarchical random effects meta-analysis was used to synthesise the results. A total of 81 studies reporting on nearly one-million individual participants were included in the review. Results demonstrated that participants who engaged in the healthiest clusters of lifestyle behaviours reported significantly fewer symptoms of depression (SMD = −0.41), anxiety (SMD = −0.43) and psychological distress (SMD = −0.34) compared to participants engaging in less healthy combinations of lifestyle behaviours, and a dose response relationship was observed across outcomes. These results demonstrate that there is a moderate-to-strong relationship between engaging in clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours and mental health outcomes and demonstrate the importance of considering healthy lifestyle as a whole instead of as individual parts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000510\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours are associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Engagement in healthy and unhealthy lifestyle behaviours are related to a range of mental health outcomes. Most existing research has focussed on individual lifestyle behaviours, so it is not clear the extent to which clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours relate to mental health outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and quantitatively synthesise research which have examined the association between clusters of lifestyle behaviours with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. A systematic search of five electronic databases were conducted to identify studies which used person-centred approaches (e.g., cluster analysis, latent class analysis) to identify subgroups of participants based on at least two unique lifestyle behaviours (i.e., physical activity/sedentary behaviours, diet, sleep, alcohol/tobacco/drug use) and examined differences in symptoms of depression, anxiety, or psychological distress between clusters. A correlated and hierarchical random effects meta-analysis was used to synthesise the results. A total of 81 studies reporting on nearly one-million individual participants were included in the review. Results demonstrated that participants who engaged in the healthiest clusters of lifestyle behaviours reported significantly fewer symptoms of depression (SMD = −0.41), anxiety (SMD = −0.43) and psychological distress (SMD = −0.34) compared to participants engaging in less healthy combinations of lifestyle behaviours, and a dose response relationship was observed across outcomes. These results demonstrate that there is a moderate-to-strong relationship between engaging in clusters of healthy lifestyle behaviours and mental health outcomes and demonstrate the importance of considering healthy lifestyle as a whole instead of as individual parts.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.