评估COVID-19疫苗接种自我报告和疫苗卡数据之间的并发性和差距

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Marie C.D. Stoner , Jenna Michaels , Jacob B. Stocks , Noah Mancuso , Zachary Soberano , Erica Browne , C. Lily Bond , Ibrahim Yigit , Allysha C. Maragh-Bass , Audrey E. Pettifor , Kathryn E. Muessig , Maria Leonora G. Comello , Margo Adams Larsen , Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman , Henna Budhwani
{"title":"评估COVID-19疫苗接种自我报告和疫苗卡数据之间的并发性和差距","authors":"Marie C.D. Stoner ,&nbsp;Jenna Michaels ,&nbsp;Jacob B. Stocks ,&nbsp;Noah Mancuso ,&nbsp;Zachary Soberano ,&nbsp;Erica Browne ,&nbsp;C. Lily Bond ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Yigit ,&nbsp;Allysha C. Maragh-Bass ,&nbsp;Audrey E. Pettifor ,&nbsp;Kathryn E. Muessig ,&nbsp;Maria Leonora G. Comello ,&nbsp;Margo Adams Larsen ,&nbsp;Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman ,&nbsp;Henna Budhwani","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 127136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating concurrency and gaps between self-report and vaccine card data for COVID-19 vaccination\",\"authors\":\"Marie C.D. Stoner ,&nbsp;Jenna Michaels ,&nbsp;Jacob B. Stocks ,&nbsp;Noah Mancuso ,&nbsp;Zachary Soberano ,&nbsp;Erica Browne ,&nbsp;C. Lily Bond ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Yigit ,&nbsp;Allysha C. Maragh-Bass ,&nbsp;Audrey E. Pettifor ,&nbsp;Kathryn E. Muessig ,&nbsp;Maria Leonora G. Comello ,&nbsp;Margo Adams Larsen ,&nbsp;Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman ,&nbsp;Henna Budhwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25004335\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25004335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将自我报告的疫苗接种与疫苗卡数据进行比较,以评估乔治亚州、阿拉巴马州和北卡罗来纳州黑人青年样本的并发性。随着时间的推移,我们描述了疫苗卡与自我报告的数据,并检查了这两个来源之间报告的差异。结果表明,强势货币表明,收集自我报告的数据可能是一种可接受的替代要求官方疫苗文件的方法。然而,由于58%的参与者没有上传疫苗卡,因此应谨慎应用这一发现。结果发现了微小的差异,通常是由于自我报告的助推器,但不是卡片上的。疫苗和加强剂数量的差异可能是因为COVID-19疫苗接种已成为常规,疫苗卡没有定期更新。在大流行的这一阶段,以及在药店例行接种疫苗的情况下,自我报告可能是接种疫苗次数的可靠指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating concurrency and gaps between self-report and vaccine card data for COVID-19 vaccination
We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信