援助还是制裁?比较气候融资和环境税收在缓解非洲环境退化方面的有效性

Arsene Mouongue Kelly , Luc Nembot Ndeffo
{"title":"援助还是制裁?比较气候融资和环境税收在缓解非洲环境退化方面的有效性","authors":"Arsene Mouongue Kelly ,&nbsp;Luc Nembot Ndeffo","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In line with Sustainable Development Goal 15, which focuses on life on land, protecting our planet for future generations becomes an imperative challenge. To address this, the present study examines the comparative efficiency of climate finance and environmental taxes in mitigating environmental degradation across Africa. Using data from 26 African countries over the period 2012 to 2021, this study employs the system Generalized Method of Moments regressions to analyze the effect of these two financial mechanisms on environmental outcomes. The results reveal that both climate finance and environmental taxes significantly contribute to reducing environmental degradation, with environmental taxes proving to be more effective. The study further identifies human capital and governance as the indirect paths through which climate finance and environmental taxes mitigate environmental degradation in Africa. The findings remain consistent even after conducting a series of robustness checks using alternative proxies for climate finance, environmental taxes, and ecological footprint. Based on the results, the paper recommends prioritizing and enhancing environmental tax policies, as well as expanding and effectively allocating climate finance, while also investing in human capital and governance reforms for more effective environmental outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aid or sanction? Comparing the effectiveness of climate finance and environmental taxation in mitigating environmental degradation in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Arsene Mouongue Kelly ,&nbsp;Luc Nembot Ndeffo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In line with Sustainable Development Goal 15, which focuses on life on land, protecting our planet for future generations becomes an imperative challenge. To address this, the present study examines the comparative efficiency of climate finance and environmental taxes in mitigating environmental degradation across Africa. Using data from 26 African countries over the period 2012 to 2021, this study employs the system Generalized Method of Moments regressions to analyze the effect of these two financial mechanisms on environmental outcomes. The results reveal that both climate finance and environmental taxes significantly contribute to reducing environmental degradation, with environmental taxes proving to be more effective. The study further identifies human capital and governance as the indirect paths through which climate finance and environmental taxes mitigate environmental degradation in Africa. The findings remain consistent even after conducting a series of robustness checks using alternative proxies for climate finance, environmental taxes, and ecological footprint. Based on the results, the paper recommends prioritizing and enhancing environmental tax policies, as well as expanding and effectively allocating climate finance, while also investing in human capital and governance reforms for more effective environmental outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation and Green Development\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation and Green Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据以陆地生命为重点的可持续发展目标15,为子孙后代保护我们的地球成为一项紧迫的挑战。为了解决这个问题,本研究考察了气候融资和环境税在缓解非洲环境退化方面的相对效率。利用2012年至2021年26个非洲国家的数据,本研究采用广义矩量回归方法系统分析了这两种金融机制对环境结果的影响。结果表明,气候融资和环境税都对减少环境退化有显著贡献,环境税被证明更有效。该研究进一步确定了人力资本和治理是气候融资和环境税缓解非洲环境退化的间接途径。即使在使用气候融资、环境税和生态足迹等替代指标进行了一系列稳健性检验之后,这些发现仍然是一致的。根据研究结果,本文建议优先考虑并加强环境税收政策,扩大并有效分配气候资金,同时投资于人力资本和治理改革,以取得更有效的环境成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aid or sanction? Comparing the effectiveness of climate finance and environmental taxation in mitigating environmental degradation in Africa
In line with Sustainable Development Goal 15, which focuses on life on land, protecting our planet for future generations becomes an imperative challenge. To address this, the present study examines the comparative efficiency of climate finance and environmental taxes in mitigating environmental degradation across Africa. Using data from 26 African countries over the period 2012 to 2021, this study employs the system Generalized Method of Moments regressions to analyze the effect of these two financial mechanisms on environmental outcomes. The results reveal that both climate finance and environmental taxes significantly contribute to reducing environmental degradation, with environmental taxes proving to be more effective. The study further identifies human capital and governance as the indirect paths through which climate finance and environmental taxes mitigate environmental degradation in Africa. The findings remain consistent even after conducting a series of robustness checks using alternative proxies for climate finance, environmental taxes, and ecological footprint. Based on the results, the paper recommends prioritizing and enhancing environmental tax policies, as well as expanding and effectively allocating climate finance, while also investing in human capital and governance reforms for more effective environmental outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信